loading
Papers Papers/2022 Papers Papers/2022

Research.Publish.Connect.

Paper

Are all Genders Equal in the Eyes of Algorithms? Analysing Search and Retrieval Algorithms for Algorithmic Gender Fairness

Topics: Applications of Knowledge Discovery and Information Retrieval; Data Analytics; Data Processing and Exploratory Data Analysis; Information Extraction; Knowledge Discovery in Databases; Natural Language Processing

Authors: Stefanie Urchs 1 ; 2 ; Veronika Thurner 1 ; Matthias Aßenmacher 2 ; 3 ; Ludwig Bothmann 2 ; Christian Heumann 2 and Stephanie Thiemichen 1

Affiliations: 1 Faculty for Computer Science and Mathematics, Hochschule München University of Applied Sciences, Munich, Germany ; 2 Department of Statistics, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany ; 3 Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML), LMU Munich, Munich, Germany

Keyword(s): Algorithmic Fairness, Academic Visibility, Information Retrieval, Search Engines, Gender Fairness.

Abstract: Algorithmic systems such as search engines and information retrieval platforms significantly influence academic visibility and the dissemination of knowledge. Despite assumptions of neutrality, these systems can reproduce or reinforce societal biases, including those related to gender. This paper introduces and applies a bias-preserving definition of algorithmic gender fairness, which assesses whether algorithmic outputs reflect real-world gender distributions without introducing or amplifying disparities. Using a heterogeneous dataset of academic profiles from German universities and universities of applied sciences, we analyse gender differences in metadata completeness, publication retrieval in academic databases, and visibility in Google search results. While we observe no overt algorithmic discrimination, our findings reveal subtle but consistent imbalances: male professors are associated with a greater number of search results and more aligned publication records, while female professors display higher variability in digital visibility. These patterns reflect the interplay between platform algorithms, institutional curation, and individual self-presentation. Our study highlights the need for fairness evaluations that account for both technical performance and representational equality in digital systems. (More)

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Sign In Guest: Register as new SciTePress user now for free.

Sign In SciTePress user: please login.

PDF ImageMy Papers

You are not signed in, therefore limits apply to your IP address 216.73.216.84

In the current month:
Recent papers: 100 available of 100 total
2+ years older papers: 200 available of 200 total

Paper citation in several formats:
Urchs, S., Thurner, V., Aßenmacher, M., Bothmann, L., Heumann, C. and Thiemichen, S. (2025). Are all Genders Equal in the Eyes of Algorithms? Analysing Search and Retrieval Algorithms for Algorithmic Gender Fairness. In Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - KDIR; ISBN ; ISSN 2184-3228, SciTePress, pages 489-500. DOI: 10.5220/0013835600004000

@conference{kdir25,
author={Stefanie Urchs and Veronika Thurner and Matthias Aßenmacher and Ludwig Bothmann and Christian Heumann and Stephanie Thiemichen},
title={Are all Genders Equal in the Eyes of Algorithms? Analysing Search and Retrieval Algorithms for Algorithmic Gender Fairness},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - KDIR},
year={2025},
pages={489-500},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0013835600004000},
isbn={},
issn={2184-3228},
}

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - KDIR
TI - Are all Genders Equal in the Eyes of Algorithms? Analysing Search and Retrieval Algorithms for Algorithmic Gender Fairness
SN -
IS - 2184-3228
AU - Urchs, S.
AU - Thurner, V.
AU - Aßenmacher, M.
AU - Bothmann, L.
AU - Heumann, C.
AU - Thiemichen, S.
PY - 2025
SP - 489
EP - 500
DO - 10.5220/0013835600004000
PB - SciTePress