loading
Papers

Research.Publish.Connect.

Paper

Author: Luca Longo

Affiliation: Dublin Institute of Technology and ADAPT: The Global Centre of Excellence for Digital Content and Media Innovation, Ireland

ISBN: 978-989-758-291-2

Keyword(s): Human Mental Workload, Cognitive Load Theory, Instructional Design.

Related Ontology Subjects/Areas/Topics: Computer-Supported Education ; e-Learning ; Instructional Design ; Learning/Teaching Methodologies and Assessment ; Metrics and Performance Measurement

Abstract: Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) has been conceived for instructional designers eager to create instructional resources that are presented in a way that encourages the activities of the learners and optimise their performance, thus their learning. Although it has been researched for many years, it has been criticised because of its theoretical clarity and its methodological approach. In particular, one fundamental and open problem is the measurement of its cognitive load types and the measurement of the overall cognitive load of learners during learning tasks. This paper is aimed at investigating the reliability, validity and sensitivity of existing mental workload assessment techniques, borrowed from the discipline of Ergonomics, when applied to the field of Education, Teaching and Learning. In details, a primary research involved the application of three subjective mental workload assessment techniques, namely the NASA Task Load Index, the Workload Profile and the Rating Scale Mental Eff ort, in a typical third-level classroom for the evaluation of two instructional design conditions. The Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning and its design principles have been used as the underlying theoretical framework for the design of the two conditions. Evidence strongly suggests that the three selected mental workload measures are highly reliable within Education and their moderate validity is in line with results obtained in Ergonomics. (More)

PDF ImageFull Text

Download
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Sign In Guest: Register as new SciTePress user now for free.

Sign In SciTePress user: please login.

PDF ImageMy Papers

You are not signed in, therefore limits apply to your IP address 3.80.6.254

In the current month:
Recent papers: 100 available of 100 total
2+ years older papers: 200 available of 200 total

Paper citation in several formats:
Longo, L. (2018). On the Reliability, Validity and Sensitivity of Three Mental Workload Assessment Techniques for the Evaluation of Instructional Designs: A Case Study in a Third-level Course.In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-291-2, pages 166-178. DOI: 10.5220/0006801801660178

@conference{csedu18,
author={Luca Longo.},
title={On the Reliability, Validity and Sensitivity of Three Mental Workload Assessment Techniques for the Evaluation of Instructional Designs: A Case Study in a Third-level Course},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,},
year={2018},
pages={166-178},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0006801801660178},
isbn={978-989-758-291-2},
}

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,
TI - On the Reliability, Validity and Sensitivity of Three Mental Workload Assessment Techniques for the Evaluation of Instructional Designs: A Case Study in a Third-level Course
SN - 978-989-758-291-2
AU - Longo, L.
PY - 2018
SP - 166
EP - 178
DO - 10.5220/0006801801660178

Login or register to post comments.

Comments on this Paper: Be the first to review this paper.