The Intelligent Water Project: Bringing Understanding to Water Pumps
in Africa
Daniel Scott Weaver
1
, Brian Nejmeh
1
, David Vader
2
and Tony Beers
2
1
Department of Computer and Information Science, Messiah College, Mechanicsburg, PA 17055, U.S.A.
2
The Collaboratory for Strategic Partnerships and Applied Research, Messiah College, Mechanicsburg, PA 17055, U.S.A.
Keywords:
Intelligent Water Project, Monitor, SMS, Texting, Handpump, Hand Pump, Sensor, Remote.
Abstract:
The Intelligent Water Project (IWP), born out of an effort to increase handpump reliability, measures and re-
ports the functionality of handpumps and volume of water extracted on two-hour intervals daily. Additionally,
IWP will measure groundwater levels which can be used to evaluate well yields. Data from handpumps is
automatically collected and transmitted to a remote database. Once in the database, the data is analyzed and
distributed to stakeholders via web and mobile applications and customizable alerts. Besides monitoring water
extraction, handpump performance, and borehole health, the IWP system processes data to alert stakeholders
of failure or degrading conditions (imminent failure). Coupled with appropriate field management processes,
this information can lead to improved handpump availability and lowered cost of ownership. The key goal is to
dramatically increase the reliability of handpumps. A secondary goal is the collection of handpump data from
all IWP enabled pump sources providing a rich resource of data to enabling WASH practitioners, managers,
hydrologist and donors to make more informed decisions.
1 INTRODUCTION
Wells and handpumps in Africa fail at alarming rates
within the first two years of installation ((RWSN),
2009). Much of this failure can be attributed to a lack
of transparency into the performance of handpumps.
Existing manual methods of handpump monitoring
require manual field inspection by personnel which
is costly, untimely and superficial. Furthermore, trav-
eling long distances to reach handpumps results in in-
frequent inspections.
The advent of low cost, reliable sensor technology
coupled with the ubiquitous GSM network has the po-
tential to bring unprecedented levels of transparency
to handpump performance in rural Africa. Our project
has refined a fully automated wireless, sensor-based
mobile and web application suite to provide signif-
icant remote transparency of the overall handpump
performance.
Initial concept development of the Intelligent Wa-
ter Project (IWP) sensor technology and the software
suite began in 2012 with internal funding from the
Messiah College Collaboratory and the Department
of Computer and Information Science (CIS) with sub-
sequent funding from World Vision. This project
is being done by a coordinated group of faculty
members and students across various engineering and
computer science disciplines at Messiah College, a
Christian college based in the United States. The soft-
ware for this project has been developed using the Ag-
ile Scrum method(Nejmeh and Weaver, 2014) in two
service-learning computer science classes (database
applications, senior capstone course in CIS). Given
the Christian-faith tradition of Messiah College, we
often use Biblical references to help motivate our
work. Work on the IWP project has been inspired by
the following passage: The poor and needy seek wa-
ter, but there is none, their tongues fail for thirst. I, the
Lord, will hear them; I, the God of Israel, will not for-
sake them. I will open rivers in desolate heights, and
fountains in the midst of the valleys; I will make the
wilderness a pool of water, and the dry land springs
of water. Isaiah 41:17-18 (NKJ)
1.1 Related Work
Broadly speaking, there are two different types of so-
lutions to monitoring handpumps: non-sensor based
approaches and sensor based approaches. Non-sensor
based approaches use mobile apps into which hu-
mans input data for subsequent machine analysis.
This includes generic (non-water specific) mobile
Weaver, D., Nejmeh, B., Vader, D. and Beers, T.
The Intelligent Water Project: Bringing Understanding to Water Pumps in Africa.
In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management (GISTAM 2016), pages 211-218
ISBN: 978-989-758-188-5
Copyright
c
2016 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
211
app toolkits such as iFormBuilder
R
(Zerion Soft-
ware, 2015), Open Data Kit (ODK) (OpenDataKit,
2015), FrontLineSMS (FrontlineSMS, 2015), de-
vicemagic (Inc., 2015), and Magpi (Magpi, 2015)
(formerly EpiSurveyor). Water specific mobile apps
include aquaya (Institute, 2015), Mwater.co (mWater,
2015), and Akvo FLOW (Akvo, 2015).
There are a few sensor-based approaches to auto-
mate handpump data collection. Among them are the
Sweetlab project (Thomas, 2013) and the Oxford Uni-
versity Smart Water project (Rob Hope, 2011). The
Oxford project performed a proof of concept study to
determine the feasibility of using low cost accelerom-
eters to estimate handpump extractions. Our work ex-
pands on this work to develop a sophisticated system
that monitors not only handle movement but water
flow and well water level. Our system is differenti-
ated by the following attributes:
it provides support for automated, sensor-based
handpump data collection over the ubiquitous
GSM network,
it provides full transparency and access to all of
the underlying sensor data via the website,
it supports configurable, periodic status alerts on
user defined events of interest,
it leverages the work of the Messiah College In-
dia MKII and Afridev Sustainability Studies that
gives unique insight and focus to the sensor de-
sign (Anthony Q. Beers, 2013),
it provides full integration with Google Maps
R
and ESRI (GIS cloud environment) systems,
it is a cloud-based application suite which runs on
desktops and mobile devices,
it is being developed by an interdisciplinary team
of hydrologists, mechanical engineers, electrical
engineers and computer scientists.
2 PROBLEM STATEMENT
Approximately 184 million people living in Africa
depend on handpumps for their daily water sup-
ply (MacArthur, 2015) with an estimated 50,000 new
handpumps shipped to Africa each year (Sansom
and Koestler, 2009). Despite efforts to improve ru-
ral water service delivery, handpumps serving ru-
ral communities often fall into disrepair. According
to data compiled by Rural Water Supply Network
(RWSN) ((RWSN), 2009) from 20 African nations
covering 345,071 wells in 2009, 36% of handpumps
are non-operational. This results in a loss of capi-
tal investment in infrastructure and a negative impact
on rural communities. When a community handpump
breaks down, families are forced to find alternative
water sources. Alternative sources may include car-
rying water a greater distance from a handpump in
a neighboring community, or less protected sources
such as hand dug scoops or surface water. The lat-
ter sources carry increased risk of water born disease.
The increased time and energy spent collecting water
and the potential for illness detract from more eco-
nomically empowering activities.
Logistical challenges and costs hamper effective
and efficient handpump monitoring and evaluation
efforts in rural areas. To determine the condition
of a handpump, water authority representatives must
travel to each handpump location and perform a man-
ual inspection. This process can result in lengthy
down-times and high labor and transportation costs
incurred by the community and/or sponsoring NGO
or government organization. As a consequence, hand-
pumps may go weeks without necessary repairs and
Water and Sanitation Hygiene (WASH) managers are
forced to make critical program decisions on incom-
plete data.
Given the critical importance of clean water, it fol-
lows that an accurate, reliable and low-cost tool to
assess handpump performance efficiency and effec-
tiveness would be valuable to many stakeholders. Im-
proved handpump transparency can lead to better visi-
bility and early warning of handpump problems. This
will enable timely handpump remediation, thereby
leading to improvements in overall pump efficiency
and effectiveness in service to rural African commu-
nities.
3 SOLUTION OVERVIEW
The primary goal of IWP is to develop a system to
automatically capture and organize data about hand-
pump functionality and performance from both sen-
sor and human sources. This allows the IWP to alert
stakeholders via web and mobile applications, email,
and text messaging of pump failure or degrading con-
ditions. Coupled with appropriate field response pro-
cesses, the information the system provides can lead
to improved handpump availability with a lower cost
of ownership. A secondary goal is the collection of
handpump data from all IWP enabled pump sources
providing a rich resource of data to enabling WASH
practitioners, managers, hydrologists and donors to
make more informed decisions.
The IWP team decided on the following design
goals and desired outcomes to drive our process:
GISTAM 2016 - 2nd International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management
212
3.1 Design Goals
Design a solar-powered, GSM-enabled, pump
monitor with a network of sensors to communi-
cate with a cloud-based database application,
Design a web-based application suite to produce
actionable information about handpumps,
Design a mobile application that exploits
location-aware and other mobile capabilities for
local field technology workers.
3.2 Desired Outcomes
Improved visibility of handpump performance
and ease of maintenance and reporting,
Improved understanding of water extraction for
each handpump (how much and when),
Improved understanding of well water level fluc-
tuations,
Single, unified source for storage, access, and
analyses of handpump related data.
3.3 System Overview
The IWP remotely monitors handpumps, including
the Afridev and India MKII, through the use of an em-
bedded monitor installed in the handpump. The mon-
itor, connected to and collecting data from concur-
rently installed sensors, is equipped with a GSM mo-
dem to communicate with the cloud-based database
application via text messaging through an SMS re-
ceiver service. The cloud-based database application
parses the transmitted data, populates the database
and determines the performance and status of the
handpump (See Figure 1).
Figure 1: The Conceptual Overview of IWP.
Each day the IWP embedded monitor measures
and records the volume of water extracted by the
handpump in two hour intervals, the amount of effort
required to prime the pump, and the largest recorded
leakage rate. This automatically collected data is
transmitted daily to the remote database where the
information is analyzed and made available to stake-
holders via a web or mobile application. In addi-
tion to monitoring water extraction, handpump per-
formance, and borehole health, the IWP system pro-
cesses this data to predict certain degrading condi-
tions before failure occurs and notifies stakeholders
via customizable alerts. For instance, an increas-
ing amount of effort required to prime the handpump
may indicate degradation of handpump parts while
decreasing yield may indicate silting at the screened
interval.
In the event of an immediate handpump failure or
degrading condition, the system automatically gen-
erates email and text message notifications to com-
munity members and area handpump mechanics, mo-
bilizing them to inspect the handpump and make re-
pairs. Certain known failure modes are detected and
reported by IWP, enabling repair teams to carry the
needed parts, supplies, and tools to the site. Commu-
nity members and area handpump mechanics will also
have the ability to report data such as cost of repairs
or other visible handpump problems using the mobile
app. Once a handpump is repaired, sensor data will
verify handpump performance and close the failure
reporting loop.
4 FUNCTIONAL OVERVIEW
The main subsystems of IWP include the monitor
hardware, database, data transport, mobile app, and
web interface.
4.1 Monitor Hardware
The IWP system hardware consists of a solar-
powered, GSM cellular-enabled sensor node that
mounts inside of India MKII and Afridev handpumps.
See Figure 2 for the mechanical layout of IWP on
the India MKII platform. The system monitors the
motion of the handpump handle and the presence or
absence of water in the mouth of the rising main to
(a) ascertain the amount of upstroke required to prime
the pump, (b) the amount of water extracted from the
pump and (c) the rate of leakage in the rising mains.
This information is summarized and sent daily to the
IWP database.
Since characteristics of handpumps such as the In-
dia MKII and Afridev include an open channel, a non-
steady flow and low flow rates, standard off-the-shelf
The Intelligent Water Project: Bringing Understanding to Water Pumps in Africa
213
Figure 2: Mechanical Layout of IWP on the India MKII
Handpump.
flow meters were found to be unsuitable for our ap-
plication. Instead, we employ an indirect system of
measurement that takes advantage of the mechanics
of positive displacement pumps. Knowing the amount
of upstroke experienced by the pump rod and the vol-
umetric efficiency of the pump, the amount of water
that would have been extracted from the well under
ideal conditions can be calculated. For the India MKII
handpump this is given by the equation:
Volume = 0.0075∆θ × Volumetric Efficiency (1)
Where volume is in Liters, 0.0075 is a constant
derived from the geometry of the India MKII hand-
pump, θ is the angular displacement of the handle,
and the volumetric efficiency is the ratio of the vol-
ume of water extracted per stroke to the volume of
water swept by the piston (Beyer and Bryan, 1984).
By monitoring the angle of the handle with a low
cost accelerometer and performing a numerical inte-
gration in software, the total upstroke for each phase
of a pumping event can be determined and converted
into the theoretical volume of water extracted.
Real handpumps are more complicated than this
model suggests due to leakage, therefore, a second
sensor is employed. This sensor, located in the throat
of the rising main with probes protruding into the riser
pipe, relies on the difference in resistivity between air
and ground water to sense water flowing in the pump.
It transforms IWP from a system calculating theoret-
ical yields to one producing realistic data regarding
handpump performance and yield.
To compute the actual volume of water extracted,
the priming effort is first assessed by recording the
amount of upstroke measured in meters from the start
of the pumping event until the water presence sensor
detects water. This is stored as another indicator of
overall pump health. The theoretical volume of wa-
ter is then determined using the volume calculation
(See Equation 1) from the time the water was sensed
until the pumping event is complete. At the end of
the pumping event, the monitor starts a timer to de-
termine how long it takes for the water presence sen-
sor to cease detecting water. The time, in conjunc-
tion with the cross sectional area of the riser pipe, is
used to calculate the current leakage rate of the pump.
This leakage rate is then used to deduct the appro-
priate amount of volume from the theoretical yield,
producing a more realistic volume of water extracted.
The monitor records water extracted in two-hour in-
tervals, the maximum priming effort, and the leakage
rate each day.
While the sensor suite described in detail above
is application specific, the rest of the IWP system
is applicable to the needs of any solar powered,
GSM-enabled monitoring application. As a result
it was possible to incorporate several open source
and off-the-shelf solutions to decrease development
time. GSM Cellular communications and solar bat-
tery charging are handled by open source hardware
from Adafruit Industries while system power regula-
tion is managed by a commercial boost/buck regulator
circuit from Pololu Robotics (See Figure 3).
Figure 3: Current Working Prototype Monitor.
4.2 Database and Analytics
The IWP data is housed in a secure, cloud-based
database. The main components of the database are
depicted in Figure 4.
When an organization installs an IWP Monitor
in a handpump within a community, the information
necessary to track that handpump is stored in Orga-
nization, Pump, Community, and Part. The system
administrator is then able to link that handpump to
authorized Users who then have the ability to view
information about that pump anywhere in the world.
As soon as the Monitor is installed and operational, it
GISTAM 2016 - 2nd International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management
214
begins its collection and transmission of sensor data
to be stored in Sensor Data (the process of collection
and transport is discussed later).
The insertion of sensor data into the database trig-
gers a process that calculates health indicators, such
as leakage rate and, based on configurable parame-
ters, determines the current status of the handpump.
If the status of the pump changes, the system creates
an Incident report (SIR), which in turn generates an
Alert. The user, having the capability to indicate how
he/she would like to be notified, will receive the alert
on login to the web or mobile application, email, or
via text message.
Any authorized user may also create an Incident
report based on their observation of the handpump.
These human-generated incident reports (HIRs) are
included in the calculation of the pump status. Alerts
are generated based on the worse of the two types of
incident reports (HIRs or SIRs).
IWP provides a mechanism for grouping hand-
pumps together using Pump Groups. Pump groups
allow for aggregate analysis, reporting, and search-
ing across pumps in that group. Pumps can belong
to more than one group. A pump group has a unique
name and a brief description and allows pumps to be
grouped by location, field technician, type of pump,
or any user-define grouping. There are groups that
are automatically formed by IWP based on defined
attribute-pair configuration parameters. For example,
the system may be instructed to create a group con-
taining all handpumps within an x-kilometer radius
on a given GPS location, or those assigned to a given
field technician, or within a certain geographic bound-
ary such as a country. The system also allows users to
define their own pump groups, or to add groups within
groups.
When handpump technicians perform mainte-
nance on a handpump, they complete a Maintenance
Report, identifying their incurred travel, part, and la-
bor costs.
4.3 Data Transport
The Sensor data collected by the monitor is stored on
both an SD Card, installed in the monitor, and resident
memory. Every twenty-four hours the monitor pack-
ages the collected data as a JSON formatted string
and creates an SMS message. The system transmits
the SMS message over a GSM (voice grade) wireless
network to an SMS Receiver Service. It is commonly
known and field studies in Africa have shown (Ne-
jmeh and Dean, 2010) that voice grade GSM network
service is much more widely available than 3G net-
work service. Given the desire to field IWP in remote
Figure 4: Database Conceptual Model.
areas of Africa, the decision was made to only assume
a voice-grade GSM network in our design.
The SMS Receiver Service forwards the message
to the parser module in the cloud-resident database
application. The parser module posts the raw message
in the database, parses the message and (if error-free)
stores the parsed sensor data in the database.
These SMS messages are equipped with unique
sequence identifiers (USI). Once a message has been
successfully processed and added to the database, an
ACK message is sent to the monitor. Once received,
the monitor will remove the message from its queue
based on the USI.
If a message is missing data or the data does not
conform to the defined data format, an ERR message
is sent to the monitor. The monitor will then attempt
to re-transmit the message.
When a duplicate message is encountered, a DUP
message is sent to the monitor. In response, the mon-
itor deletes the message from the queue.
The insertion of the data into the database trig-
gers a process that determines the current status of the
handpump based on the current sensor data and stores
the status in the database. A handpump will have
the status of Green (running fine), Yellow (concerns
exist about the handpump), Orange (significant prob-
lems exist with the handpump), Red (pump failure),
or Grey (handpump has not been heard from). This
status will be displayed on an authorized user’s dash-
board and the handpump location depicted on Google
Maps
R
. If the status of the handpump changes, the
alert system notifies the appropriate authorized users
of the change. Handpump status is a configurable
function defined for a given set of handpumps based
on the values of daily volume extraction, leakage rate
and maximum well level.
The Intelligent Water Project: Bringing Understanding to Water Pumps in Africa
215
4.4 Mobile App
A mobile app is an important element of the overall
IWP system. It serves as a lightweight tool for work-
ers to use while in the field, thereby enabling them
to take advantage of mobile services such as location
awareness and offline modes.
Figure 5: IWP Mobile App.
User Authentication: Mobile app users login to
the mobile app using the same user name and pass-
word credenials of the web application. The mobile
app authenticates users using the same web backend
system that authenticates web users. Furthermore,
the mobile app limits user access to handpump data
and functionality identical to the security and access
model imposed by the web application.
Mobile App Interface: Figure 5 displays the
main screen of the mobile app. The core IWP mo-
bile app functions are handpump initialization, filing
maintenance reports, filing incident reports and view-
ing handpump alerts.
Handpump Initialization: This function allows
a user to initialize a handpump into the IWP system.
The function records the field technican assigned to
the handpump, the GPS coordinates of the handpump
(either automatically recorded (default) or inputted by
the user), the phone number on the SIM card installed
in the handpump monitor, the date/time of the ini-
tialization and other descriptive information about the
handpump.
Maintenance Reports: This function allows a
user to create and submit handpump maintenance re-
ports (as previously described), including the iden-
tity of the handpump, the user filing the maintenance
report, date and time of the maintenance report, a
brief description of the maintenance performed on the
handpump and the total cost of the maintenance re-
port broken down by travel costs, part costs and labor
costs.
Incident Reports: This function allows a user to
create and submit handpump incident reports (as pre-
viously described), including the identity of the hand-
pump, the user filing the incident report, date and time
of the incident report, a brief description of the inci-
dent being reported on the handpump and the nature
of the incident.
Alerts: This function allows a user to view the
alerts (as previously described) associated with the
handpumps for which the user has been granted ac-
cess.
Offline and Synchronization Modes: The mo-
bile app requires a data grade connection to transmit
data, and since there will be times when such a con-
nection is not available, an offline and synchroniza-
tion mode is necessary. In such cases, the mobile app
will locally persist the data (i.e. yet to be filed main-
tenance reports and incident reports) on the mobile
device. Upon the mobile app sensing a data grade
connection, the persisted data will be transmitted to
the IWP system.
4.5 Web Interface
The data from the monitor is collected and stored au-
tomatically in the database which can be accessed by
authorized users via a secure web application or mo-
bile app. The status of individual handpumps can
be viewed on a map interface powered by Google
Maps
R
. Each handpump on the map is represented
by the pump status indicator (green, yellow, orange,
red, or grey) depending on the level of functionality
of the handpump.
The reporting module allows users to select a
time period, single or multiple handpumps, or pump
groups for further investigation, and provides either
detailed or aggregated information. Selection can be
accomplished via the map interface by selecting in-
dividual handpumps or pump groups. The IWP web
application can export these queries as printable PDF
reports or MS Excel Spreadsheets for further investi-
gation or reporting purposes.
Notifications are handled automatically by the
IWP software in the event of a change in a handpump
status indicator. These are sent to appropriate stake-
holders via email or text message depending on their
preferences. The notifications are sent in the case of
degradation, such as a status change from green to
yellow or red, and in the case of an improvement, such
as a status change from red to yellow or green. This
allows stakeholders to know not only when a pump is
broken, but also when and to what extent it has been
repaired.
GISTAM 2016 - 2nd International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management
216
5 RESULTS TO DATE
Throughout the development of the IWP hardware,
intimate knowledge of the inner working of hand-
pumps and their failure modes and frequent field de-
ployment of prototypes have been crucial to the de-
sign of a functional system. The IWP project was
born out of a prior project (Anthony Q. Beers, 2013)
that identified the most common failures in India
MKII handpumps in West Africa which resulted in
a redesign of several failure prone components. This
initial study provided the mechanical understanding
necessary to develop a sensor suite tailored to mon-
itoring positive displacement handpumps. IWP also
benefited from the availability of complete blueprints
and 3D models of both the India MKII and Afridev
handpumps and full knowledge that the handpumps in
the field are rarely within the tolerances in the speci-
fication drawings.
The prototype IWP system has been through four
design iterations, including laboratory testing in the
US and field testing in northern Ghana. The field tri-
als occurred throughout 2014 and 2015. In our early
trials, we discovered that several key dimensions on
the MKII often fell well outside MKII design spec-
ifications. The IWP geometry and installation pro-
cedures were modified to facilitate installation in ac-
tual field conditions. Our early field trials also re-
vealed that noise effected the accelerometer data so
that deviation between actual and measured water ex-
tracted was unacceptable. Our most recent field trial
completed in October 2015. This iteration incorpo-
rates more robust sensor housings, a theft resistant
solar installation design, a software filtering solution
for noise in the accelerometer data, and a few minor
changes to the printed circuit board design. The water
presence sensor was moved out of the throat of the ris-
ing main to avoid any proximity with the handpump
rod. This sensor is now in a T fitting attached to the
top of the rising main. A ten-point moving average
algorithm has also proven an effective low pass filter
for accelerometer noise. Testing to date indicates wa-
ter extraction measurements are within ten percent of
actual.
The IWP software is managed in a Cloud envi-
ronment at the domain www.intelligentwater.net. Ini-
tially, the data transport software layer had been ex-
tensively tested in a simulated environment with rep-
resentative sensor test data imported from a spread-
sheet. Initial smartphone tests in Africa demonstrated
successfully sent test messages through an SMS Re-
ceiver Service. The web application has been devel-
oped and tested using representative sensor test data
and is functioning properly. Finally, the mobile app
is running on the Android Operating System and in-
cludes support for handpump initialization and sub-
mission of maintenance reports. The mobile app has
been used in Africa to successfully initialize a hand-
pump. The October 2015 field trial has demonstrated
that the monitor successfully communicates with the
server, sending sensor data in JSON format. In turn,
the sensor data has been successfully parsed and pop-
ulated the database appropriately. Through a series of
three successive field trials in Africa over an 18 month
period ending October 2015, we have learned a great
deal. The IWP has accomplished significant progress
toward demonstrating proof of concept. The design of
the sensors, solar panel, charging circuit, and printed
circuit card are stable, as is their integration with the
microprocessor and cell phone modules selected for
IWP.
6 FUTURE WORK
Significant opportunities exist for advancing our
work. Sensor data collected over time will validate as-
sumptions and features such as alerts, change in hand-
pump status, etc. Ideally, we would like to see the
system deployed through the status cycle of a hand-
pump to insure that the system correctly senses the
deterioration of the handpump, issues the appropriate
alerts and senses the handpump performance improv-
ing upon being repaired by a field technician.
The IWP software will evolve based on lessons
learned from field trials. It is expected that significant
advances will be made in handpump data analytics
based on feedback from handpump field technicians.
There are a number of future directions envisioned for
the mobile app, including:
improved support for offline functionality and
auto-synchronization upon network access,
Geo-location tracking for locating and navigating
to handpumps,
multi-language support for French, Spanish and
other languages,
3G wireless network data transport support for the
embedded monitor unit mounted within a hand-
pump.
In addition, processes and training need to be de-
veloped for local African technicians to utilize the
web/mobile app as they fix handpumps. Feedback
from theses sources will be used to enhance both the
web and mobile applications.
The Intelligent Water Project: Bringing Understanding to Water Pumps in Africa
217
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We acknowledge various Computer Science and Col-
laboratory students for their work on this project.
Special thanks to the extensive work of Avery de-
Gruchy, Christopher Neuman, Jacqui Young, Ken
Kok, and Makenzie Alexander.
REFERENCES
Akvo (2015). akvoflow smartphone-based field surveys.
Anthony Q. Beers, Dr. David T. Vader, D. T. V. D. D. T.
B. W. (2013). India mkii pump sustainability study
report. Technical report, Messiah College.
Beyer, M. G. and Bryan, K. (1984). Unicef and the ex-
perience in low-cost water supply and sanitation. In
World Bank Technical paper, number 48, pages 195–
215. World Bank.
FrontlineSMS (2015). Frontline sms cloud.
Inc., D. M. (2015). Collect data offline with mobile forms
and surveys.
Institute, T. A. (2015). Improving health through clean wa-
ter innovation.
MacArthur, J. (2015). Handpump standardisation in sub-
saharan africa.
Magpi (2015). Advanced mobile data collection anywhere,
on any device.
mWater (2015). Technology for water and health.
Nejmeh, B. and Weaver, D. S. (2014). Leveraging scrum
principles in collaborative, inter-disciplinary service-
learning project courses. In Frontiers in Education
Conference (FIE), 2014 IEEE, pages 1–6. IEEE.
Nejmeh, B. A. and Dean, T. (2010). The charms applica-
tion suite: A community-based mobile data collection
and alerting environment for hiv/aids orphan and vul-
nerable children in zambia. International Journal of
Computing and ICT Research, page 46.
OpenDataKit (2015). Opendatakit magnifying human re-
sources through technology.
Rob Hope, Michael Rouse, A. M. T. F. (2011). Smart water
system. Technical report, Oxford University.
(RWSN), R. W. S. N. (2009). Handpump data 2009.
Sansom, K. and Koestler, L. (2009). African handpump
market mapping study.
Thomas, D. E. A. (2013). (im)proving global impact: How
the integration of remotely reporting sensors in wa-
ter projects may demonstrate and enhance positive
change. Global Water Forum.
Zerion Software, I. (2015). iformbuilder mobile platform.
GISTAM 2016 - 2nd International Conference on Geographical Information Systems Theory, Applications and Management
218