ARCHITECTURE FOR OPERATION MANAGEMENT
IN URBAN RAIL TRAFFIC
Minmin Xiao and Shifeng Liu
School of Economic and management, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China
Keywords: Urban rail transit, Production and operations management system, Informationization.
Abstract: It is conspicuously to announce that China has already become the country with the largest-scale market as
well as the fastest growing urban rail transit in the world. This article, from the perspective of production
and operations, has described the status quo of the informationization of rail transit enterprises and analyzed
the demand for functions of production and operations management of these enterprises, aiming at the
improvement of current delicacy management. Meanwhile, we have put forward the general framework of
the system of operations management and discussed the system’s key functions to clarify its significance to
rail transit enterprises and recommend certain effective methods to enhance the informationization of the
production and operations management of rail transit enterprises.
1 INTRODUCTION
With the rapid development of cities around China,
rail transit has already become a fundamental project
of infrastructure to optimize the public
transportation and make the cities’ development
sustainable (LiBo, 2008). China is presently
enjoying a boom in constructing the rail transit and
has become the biggest market for the construction
of rail transit
(Liu R. F., Guan C. Q., 2005). As an
expression of advanced transportation technology
and a desirable way of transportation, rail transit
surely depends on informationization, which is a
necessary means to the prevention of safety
accidents in rail transit and delicacy management
(LiBo, 2008). Although China’s rail transit has
entered the period of informationization, there are
still plenty of problems in its information system.
From the perspective of production and
operations (Bai, Ma, 2010), there are problems like
low rate of integration (Martinez MJ, 2009) of such
subsystems as rails, vehicles, power supply, signal
and so on, lack of composite application, inadequate
arrangements for information resources, poor
sharing rate and insufficient extension of the
coverage of informationization (ZhouXiaoqi,
ZhengJian, 2005). What’s more, with the increase of
volumes of passengers (Aftabuzzaman M
(Aftabuzzaman, Md), Currie G (Currie, Graham),
Sarvi M (Sarvi, Majid), 2010), the current situation
of operations become increasingly poor, which has
been severely affecting the rail transit’s traffic
functions.
In order to address the issues mentioned above,
this article analyzes and discuss the general
framework (Koutsopoulos, Harls N., Wang, Zhigao,
2009) and key functions of the information system
of production and operations management of rail
transit (Holmstrom J, Framling K, Ala-Risku T,
2010). The system begins with the rail transit’s
technological features and aims at the improvement
of delicacy management. It also intends to combine
the various technology systems and business
management system together organically, and
achieve prediction and analysis to the volume,
organizations of traffic, directions of manoeuvre,
management of passenger transportation and the
informationization of alert and exigent directions to
enhance the rail transit enterprises’ construction of
informationization under the three main subjects of
rail transit’s production and operation-safety,
service, efficiency (Song Y, Wang ZC, Wang MS,
Huang S. G, 2010).
2 TRANSACTION
REQUIREMENT ANALYSES
As we all know, safety, effective operations and
serving societies are the primary goals of rail transit.
From the perspective of production of transportation,
rail transit is a huge and complex technology system
481
Xiao M. and Liu S..
ARCHITECTURE FOR OPERATION MANAGEMENT IN URBAN RAIL TRAFFIC.
DOI: 10.5220/0003584104810485
In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (SSE-2011), pages 481-485
ISBN: 978-989-8425-53-9
Copyright
c
2011 SCITEPRESS (Science and Technology Publications, Lda.)
made of such subsystems like rails, locomotives,
power supply, telecommunications and signals. And
it is also a system of unity of people and machines
(Shinya Kikuchi1, Nopadon Kronprasert, 2011)
The management core of rail transit enterprises is to
get the sectors in the production of transportation
linked organically, so that the whole system’s safety
and efficiency can be assured. Therefore, the daily
operation put emphasis on organizations of
transportation, service to passenger transportation
and safety management. A management information
system (MIS), with advanced technology, legitimate
structure, and synchronized functions, provides
powerful technological support to reach effective
operations, excellent services, safe motions and
scientific management. To achieve these goals, the
practice demand for functions of this system is as
follows:
z Management of transportation. Transportation
organization includes equipment for operations,
staff, operation plans and the work of direction.
Good transportation management is
instrumental to optimize the system’s
efficiency, magnify the capacity of traffic, meet
passengers’ and owners of cargo’s diverse
needs, and provide more convenient, faster and
more comfortable services. Thus, it is of great
importance.
z Management of passenger services. It includes
services to passengers, ticketing, tickets funds,
platform services and complaints settlement.
The agents should conform to the principle of
“focus on people”, and advocate high-
efficiency and high-quality services. At the
same time, due to the differences of the cost of
investment to subway routes in different cities,
the income from ticketing should be distributed
to respective companies, so that managers can
master the operation situation of every unit.
z Safety management. The system has to
guarantee the safety of the operating vehicles
(Ding Lieyun, Jia L, Fu Feifei, Luo Hanbin,
Wu Xianguo, 2009). During the process of
informationization, the selected equipment and
adopted technology must ensure the safely
running. Meanwhile, the adoption of mature
technology can make the system run smoothly
and avoid the risks brought by preliminary trial
operations. Making good use of sophisticated
technologies that already existed from domestic
and overseas will shorten the construction
period substantially, and reinforce the system’s
stability so that we can see the benefits from
informationization sooner.
z Integrated management (Stella F, Vigano V,
Bogni D, Benzoni M, 2006) with advanced
information technologies. The information
system should set out from the whole entity,
design systematically and implement
universally, so that the construction of the
system can be carried out organically and
orderly. Each subsystem should not be systems
isolated from the outside, and should be closely
connected with other systems in order to
achieve the information sharing within the
system and among other practice systems, as
well as the related units of government and
local communities.
3 THE ARCHITECTURE OF
OPERATION MANAGEMENT
INFORMATION SYSTEM
In order to fulfill the enterprises’ demand for
operation management, the application structures of
MIS are illustrated as figure 1.
As is shown in figure 1, the system has two
hierarchies. The bottom layer serves to monitor
comprehensively, belonging to the technology
system; the upper layer is a platform for production,
belonging to management system. The respective
functions and contents of each hierarchy are as
follows.
3.1 Comprehensive Monitoring --
Technology System
This hierarchy is closely connected to hardware. It
controls the hardware and collects and analyze the
signals of the equipment’s status though
telecommunication system. This layer mainly
embraces SCADA, AFC, FAS, BAS, PIS and other
systems, which can monitor the power supply,
locomotives, the risk of fire, environmental
disasters, the mechanical and electrical equipment at
the station, the automatic tickets-checking devices,
and the equipment for guiding the passengers. The
subsystems mentioned above finally unify together
through the comprehensive monitoring system, and
offer a way for the staff to master the situation of
operations. Theoretically, the comprehensive
monitoring system is able to combine all the
technology subsystems together, and make
suggestions for the comprehensive manoeuvre
decisions by gathering signals, analyzing universally,
and translating the information for the administrative.
ICEIS 2011 - 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems
482
Figure 1: The architecture of operation management system.
However, we must note that the current
comprehensive surveillance systems in the field of
rail transportation both domestically and abroad, are
still developed from the perspective of technology.
Consequently, the functions of practice management
of these systems are relatively weak, and they cannot
entirely cover the requirements of production and
operations of rail transit. Therefore, it is necessary to
expand the functions of the comprehensive
monitoring system and integrate with the system of
practice management of production by data
connection with the guidance of the universal
arrangements of production and operations system.
3.2 Transaction Layer-management
System
Transaction layer is the counterpart of technology
system, belonging to the realm of management
system. However, it is organically linked with the
technology system, and needs the help of
comprehensive monitoring system to gather data
from respective technology systems, and to analyze
and transform the information to understandable
information for the administration.
According to the general rules of operations
management of rail transit, this layer primarily
implements the task of informationization of
prediction and analysis to the volume, organizations
of traffic, management of passenger transportation
and the informationization of alert and exigent
directions. The systems mentioned above need to
exchange data with the technology systems. For
example, the volume prediction system need to be
connected with AFC to collect the information of
passenger volume; the system of organizations of
traffic needs to convey the locomotives’ operation
plans to the commanding center; the system of
scheduling command needs to receive various data
from comprehensive monitoring system and
translate them into the proper forms to the officials;
the system of alert and exigent directions needs to
further analyze the data from the comprehensive
monitoring system from the perspective of safety
and emergencies, and to start the counter plans to
tackle the certain situation.
4 KEY FUNCTIONS AND THE
FULFILLMENT OF MIS
For this part, we are going to discuss the most
important functions for production and operation
management in rail transit industy.
ARCHITECTURE FOR OPERATION MANAGEMENT IN URBAN RAIL TRAFFIC
483
4.1 Subsystem for Predicting and
Analyzing of Passengers
This subsystem conducts the predictions of volume
of passengers and many kinds of statistical analyses
at both macro and micro levels to provide
justifications to routes operation plan, organization
management and program management, which is the
origin of the management information system of
production and operations. It mainly includes such
key functions like collecting fundamental data,
predicting and analyzing the passenger volume at
macro level, predicting and analyzing the passenger
volume at micro level, statistically analyzing reports
and so on. The fundamental data are classified into
four categories. The first kind of data is those
statistics from the authority, including population,
economy, traffic and city planning. The second kind
is the collected data about the passenger volume,
including the information about passengers’ needs
for going out, the information on passengers’ ways
of transportation, passengers’ starting and finishing
points, their ages, incomes, and psychology. The
third category of data is the real figures of AFC.
According to the current technological means of
AFC, there are starting and finishing points and
tickets funds. The last kind of data is synthesis of
survey on volume and samples of AFC data. The
macro prediction and analysis are mainly based on
the first, second and fourth categories of data,
specifically including such functions like
management of repertoire of predicting models,
generating plans for out-going, distribution of
traffic, division of means and allocation of traffic
volume. The micro prediction and analysis are
mainly based on the last two kinds of data, including
functions like the management of past volume
statistics, the regular patterns of the distribution of
passengers volume (trend, fluctuations among
seasons, and recurring fluctuations). The report
involving analyzing the macro and micro prediction
results jointly, showing the results of analyses in the
forms of graphs using GIS. The results include
analyses of density, distribution, fluctuating patterns
of passengers.
4.2 Subsystem for Traffic
Organizations
This system is actually one of the subsystems of plan
management for operations, which primarily works
on the codification of the business’ yearly plan, the
train operation diagram and other kinds of plans.
The yearly plan is a kind of macro and directive
program. This plan can be further into quarterly,
monthly and ten-day basis plans, and it has a
function of adjustment of plans. The main tasks of
the codification system are to codify the regular train
operation graphs and the ones on weekends and
holidays, in order to adjust to the fluctuations of
volume. Besides, this system some subsidiary
functions like intersections management, indicators
management and simulation of operations.
Comprehensive planning mainly includes
compartment attendant planning, plan for vehicles
use. These auxiliary plans are supplements to the
train operation diagram and intend to ensure the
appropriate implementation of the train operation
diagram.
4.3 Running Dispatching Subsystem
This subsystem is used to undertake the specific
works of daily operations. It is a collective and
managenment on the basis of comprehensive
monitoring, which is directed by organizations of
traffic plan and mainly embraces traffic scheduling,
power dispatch, loop control scheduling and
comprehensive fixing scheduling.
From the management level, this subsystem
includes data exchange, scheduling log management,
daily statistical management and the comprehensive
fixing plans. Data exchange involves gathering
information from kinds of technology systems and
translating them to the understandable jargons with
the help of the comprehensive monitoring system.
Scheduling log management is a comprehensive
record of the certain shift, primarily recoding the
shifting of duty, the operation situation of each
technology system and indicators and the abnormal
condition handling. A further classification can be
power, traffic and loop control in light of specialty,
and comprehensive scheduling and scheduling on
station basis according to certain posts. Daily
statistical management produces various immediate
statistical reports according to the requirements and
provides materials to the leaders of the enterprise
and each operating department to ensure their
knowledge of the situation of production and
operations. “Accurate statistics” can be finished at
the ends of months. Comprehensive fixing plan
serves to conduct plan scheduling, which principally
involves formulating the daytime shift work plans
including personnel on duty and plan scheduling and
other scheduling functions. The main function of it
is the fulfillment of the formulation and issuing of
the day time shift plan and the arrangements of
comprehensive fixing plans.
ICEIS 2011 - 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems
484
4.4 Passenger Transportation
Management Subsystem
The subsystem has many functions such as fare,
metro card, complaints and some other passenger
service administrations (Ulusoy, 2010). Fare
statistical work is to help the corporation has an
understanding of incomes. According to customer
relationship management theory, the subway
company should feed back information in time, and
can improve the service quality of company finally.
4.5 Warning and Emergency
Command Subsystem
According to precautionary theory, this subsystem
mainly involves emergency command, safety
precaution and education management. Also, it
concludes circumstance, equipment, administration,
and other factors. To be specific, safety precaution
management has the features of safety architecture
management and monitor information collection;
emergency management mainly includes security
pre-proposal on railway accidents.
5 CONCLUSIONS
This article analyzes the requirements of operation
management, from the angel of urban rail transit
business. Through the analysis, we propose a
framework for operation management information
system. Further more, we analyze the key functions
of the system in detail. However, the rail transit has
the characteristics of complexity, more intermediate
links and strong ties. Therefore, the fine-grained
management should, based on advanced
management system, make full use of information
technology. In the end, the purpose of this article is
to offer a model for operation management in rail
transit industry, and expect the industry to achieve
the goal of modernization and informationization
finally.
REFERENCES
Ulusoy, 2010. Optimal All-Stop, Short-Turn and Express
Transit Services under Heterogeneous Demand.
Transportation Research Record.
Ding Lieyun, Jia L., Fu Feifei, Luo Hanbin, Wu Xianguo,
2009. Research on Safety Standards System of Urban
Rail Transit. CRIOCM2009: International Symposium
on Advancement of Construction Management and
Real Estate.
Song Y, Wang Z. C., Wang M. S., Huang S. G., 2010.
Evaluation of Urban Rail Transit Transfer Efficiency.
Beijing Jiaotong University press.
Aftabuzzaman M. (Aftabuzzaman, Md), Currie G. (Currie,
Graham), Sarvi M. (Sarvi, Majid), 2010. Modeling
the Spatial Impacts of Public Transport on Traffic
Congestion Relief in Melbourne, Australia.
Transportation Research Record.
ZhouXiaoqi, ZhengJian, 2005. Construction of rail transit
information development. World Railway.
Bai Y. (Bai, Yan), Ma J. Q. (Ma, Jiaqi), 2010(8). Study on
Operation Optimization of urt under Special
Conditions. Key technologies of railway engineering -
high speed railway, heavy haul railway and urban rail
transit.
Martinez M. J., 2009. Calculation of Benefits of Advanced
Integrated Rail Service Application of Intelligent
Transportation Systems to the Developing City of
Lima, Peru. Transportation research record.
LiBo, 2008. Problems of traffic----Analysis of urban rail
transit informatization. China Informatization.
Stella F. (Stella, Fabio), Vigano V. (Vigano, Vittorio),
Bogni D. (Bogni, Davide), Benzoni M. (Benzoni,
Matteo), 2006. An integrated forecasting and
regularization framework for light rail transit systems.
Journal of intelligent transportation systems.
Holmstrom J. (Holmstrom, Jan), Framling K. (Framling,
Kary), Ala-Risku T. (Ala-Risku, Timo), 2010(8). The
uses of tracking in operations management: Synthesis
of a research program. International Journal of
Production Economics.
Shinya Kikuchi1, Nopadon Kronprasert, 2011(2).
Constructing Transit Origin-Destination Tables from
Fragmented Data. Transportation Research Board of
the National Academies.
Koutsopoulos, Harls N., Wang, Zhigao, 2009. Simulation
of urban rail operations: Application framework.
Transportation research record.
Liu R. F., Guan C. Q., 2005(6). Mode biases of urban
transportation policies in China and their implications.
Journal of Urban Planning and Development-Asce.
ARCHITECTURE FOR OPERATION MANAGEMENT IN URBAN RAIL TRAFFIC
485