loading
Papers Papers/2022 Papers Papers/2022

Research.Publish.Connect.

Paper

Paper Unlock

Authors: Nuno Guimaraes 1 ; Alvaro Figueira 1 and Luis Torgo 2

Affiliations: 1 CRACS/INESCTEC and University of Porto, Porto, Portugal ; 2 Faculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada

Keyword(s): Reliability Metrics, Social Media, Unreliable Accounts.

Abstract: The growth of social media as an information medium without restrictive measures on the creation of new accounts led to the rise of malicious agents with the intend to diffuse unreliable information in the network, ultimately affecting the perception of users in important topics such as political and health issues. Although the problem is being tackled within the domain of bot detection, the impact of studies in this area is still limited due to 1) not all accounts that spread unreliable content are bots, 2) human-operated accounts are also responsible for the diffusion of unreliable information and 3) bot accounts are not always malicious (e.g. news aggregators). Also, most of these methods are based on supervised models that required annotated data and updates to maintain their performance through time. In this work, we build a framework and develop knowledge-based metrics to complement the current research in bot detection and characterize the impact and behavior of a Twitter acco unt, independently of the way it is operated (human or bot). We proceed to analyze a sample of the accounts using the metrics proposed and evaluate the necessity of these metrics by comparing them with the scores from a bot detection system. The results show that the metrics can characterize different degrees of unreliable accounts, from unreliable bot accounts with a high number of followers to human-operated accounts that also spread unreliable content (but with less impact on the network). Furthermore, evaluating a sample of the accounts with a bot detection system shown that bots compose around 11% of the sample of unreliable accounts extracted and that the bot score is not correlated with the proposed metrics. In addition, the accounts that achieve the highest values in our metrics present different characteristics than the ones that achieve the highest bot score. This provides evidence on the usefulness of our metrics in the evaluation of unreliable accounts in social networks. (More)

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Sign In Guest: Register as new SciTePress user now for free.

Sign In SciTePress user: please login.

PDF ImageMy Papers

You are not signed in, therefore limits apply to your IP address 3.141.41.187

In the current month:
Recent papers: 100 available of 100 total
2+ years older papers: 200 available of 200 total

Paper citation in several formats:
Guimaraes, N.; Figueira, A. and Torgo, L. (2020). Knowledge-based Reliability Metrics for Social Media Accounts. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - WEBIST; ISBN 978-989-758-478-7; ISSN 2184-3252, SciTePress, pages 339-350. DOI: 10.5220/0010140403390350

@conference{webist20,
author={Nuno Guimaraes. and Alvaro Figueira. and Luis Torgo.},
title={Knowledge-based Reliability Metrics for Social Media Accounts},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - WEBIST},
year={2020},
pages={339-350},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0010140403390350},
isbn={978-989-758-478-7},
issn={2184-3252},
}

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - WEBIST
TI - Knowledge-based Reliability Metrics for Social Media Accounts
SN - 978-989-758-478-7
IS - 2184-3252
AU - Guimaraes, N.
AU - Figueira, A.
AU - Torgo, L.
PY - 2020
SP - 339
EP - 350
DO - 10.5220/0010140403390350
PB - SciTePress