loading
Papers Papers/2022 Papers Papers/2022

Research.Publish.Connect.

Paper

Authors: Yannic Jäckel ; Daniel Schiffner and Jan Schneider

Affiliation: DIPF, Leibniz-Institut für Bildungsforschung und Bildungsinformation, Rostocker Straße 6, 60323 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Keyword(s): Note-Taking, Academic Writing, Knowledge Management, Information Gathering, Critical Reading.

Abstract: This paper explores the role of note-taking as a critical, yet under-researched, practice in academic scholarship, focusing on how researchers organize, synthesize, and reuse their notes in the context of knowledge production. While previous technological advancements such as large language models (LLMs) have transformed aspects of academic writing, fundamental cognitive tasks—such as capturing and synthesizing information through note-taking—remain relatively unchanged. Drawing from existing research, we highlight how poor or ineffective note-taking practices in both students and early-career researchers can lead to inefficient work processes and diminished synthesis of knowledge. Our study involves a small-scale survey of academic researchers to examine their note-taking techniques, tool usage, and strategies for synthesis. Our findings reveal that many researchers employ unstructured methods, such as the Sentence and Outline Methods, and lack formal training in effective note-taki ng. Furthermore, despite the availability of advanced digital tools, most participants continue to rely on familiar word processors, often limiting the reusability and efficacy of their notes. We argue that structured methods and better tool utilization could significantly enhance academic writing and synthesis. The paper suggests that future research should focus on developing note-taking tools tailored to researchers’ needs, enabling more effective synthesis and the reuse of notes. Such tools could potentially integrate with LLMs to reduce the time spent on repetitive tasks and improve the quality of scientific output. This shift could lead to a paradigm where notes evolve from simple memory aids to valuable data that contributes directly to scientific advancement. (More)

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Sign In Guest: Register as new SciTePress user now for free.

Sign In SciTePress user: please login.

PDF ImageMy Papers

You are not signed in, therefore limits apply to your IP address 216.73.216.157

In the current month:
Recent papers: 100 available of 100 total
2+ years older papers: 200 available of 200 total

Paper citation in several formats:
Jäckel, Y., Schiffner, D., Schneider and J. (2025). Our Notes Leave too Much to Say: Investigating Note-Taking Practices and Technological Tools in Academia. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU; ISBN 978-989-758-746-7; ISSN 2184-5026, SciTePress, pages 493-503. DOI: 10.5220/0013218600003932

@conference{csedu25,
author={Yannic Jäckel and Daniel Schiffner and Jan Schneider},
title={Our Notes Leave too Much to Say: Investigating Note-Taking Practices and Technological Tools in Academia},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU},
year={2025},
pages={493-503},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0013218600003932},
isbn={978-989-758-746-7},
issn={2184-5026},
}

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU
TI - Our Notes Leave too Much to Say: Investigating Note-Taking Practices and Technological Tools in Academia
SN - 978-989-758-746-7
IS - 2184-5026
AU - Jäckel, Y.
AU - Schiffner, D.
AU - Schneider, J.
PY - 2025
SP - 493
EP - 503
DO - 10.5220/0013218600003932
PB - SciTePress