More Time for the Doing, Having Made the Thinking - 3D Printing for Knowledge Circulation in Healthcare

Federico Cabitza, Federico Cabitza, Federico Cabitza, Angela Locoro, Angela Locoro, Angela Locoro, Aurelio Ravarini, Aurelio Ravarini, Aurelio Ravarini, Vittorio Satta, Vittorio Satta, Vittorio Satta

Abstract

This paper investigates the phenomenon of the Digital Do-It-Yourself (Di-DIY) in the medical domain. In particular, the main contribution of the paper is a conceptual framework based on the notion of DiDIY in healthcare. To help focus on the main actors and assets composing the 3D printing innovation roles in healthcare we model: the DiDIY-er as the main initiator of the practice innovation; the available technology allowing the envisioning of new practices; the specific activities gaining benefits from the innovative techniques introduced; and the knowledge community continuously supporting and evolving knowledge practices. A general introduction on the notion of Knowledge Artifacts (KAs) and on the use of 3D printing (3DP) in medicine will be followed by our research questions and by a more detailed analysis of diagnostic, training and surgical planning activities for clinicians and patients. Observations carried out in a hospital in Italy are reported to exemplify activities based on 3DP bone models in the radiological and orthopaedic fields. These observations can be considered a second contribution of the paper, although secondary with respect to the conceptual framework. They also help proof how knowledge sharing and circulation in the community of healthcare professionals may be improved by the introduction of tangible and intangible KAs around the practice of DiDIY. Our framework is then presented in the end.

References

  1. Auricchio, F., & Marconi, S., 2016. 3D printing: clinical applications in orthopaedics and traumatology. EFORT Open Reviews, 1(5), 121-127.
  2. Bull, G., & Garofalo, J., 2009. Personal Fabrication Systems: From Bits to Atoms. Learning & Leading with Technology, 36(7), 10-12.
  3. Cabitza, F., Colombo, G., & Simone, C. 2013. Leveraging underspecification in knowledge artifacts to foster collaborative activities in professional communities. Int J Hum-Comput St, 71(1), 24-45.
  4. Cabitza, F., Fogli, D., & Locoro, A., 2016. Virtual patients for knowledge sharing and clinical practice training: a gamified approach. GALA 2015, LNCS, 329-335.
  5. Cabitza, F., Locoro, A., 2014a. Made with knowledge: Disentangling the IT Knowledge Artifact by a qualitative literature review. In KMIS 2014, 64-75.
  6. Cabitza, F., Cerroni, A., Locoro, A., Simone, C. 2014b. The knowledge-stream model: A comprehensive model for knowledge circulation in communities of knowledgeable practitioners. In KMIS 2014, 367-374.
  7. Cabitza, F., Cerroni, A., & Simone, C. 2014c. Knowledge artifacts within knowing communities to foster collective knowledge. In AVI 2014, ACM, 391-394.
  8. Cuendet, S., Bumbacher, E., and Dillenbourg, P. 2012. Tangible vs. virtual representations: when tangibles benefit the training of spatial skills. In NordiCHI 7812.
  9. de Mel, A., 2016. Three-dimensional printing and the surgeon. British Journal of Surgery, 103(7), 786-788.
  10. DiDIY, D3.1-1.2, Deliverable Doc no 3.1 of the DiDIY project, Sept 2016.
  11. Dourish, P. 2001. Where the Action is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, USA.
  12. Eltorai, A. E., Nguyen, E., & Daniels, A. H. 2015. ThreeDimensional Printing in Orthopedic Surgery. Orthopedics, 38(11), 684-687.
  13. Fedorov A., Beichel R., Kalpathy-Cramer J., … Kikinis R., 2012. 3D Slicer as an Image Computing Platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 30(9), 1323-41.
  14. Greenhalgh, T., & Wieringa, S., 2011. Is it time to drop the 'knowledge translation'metaphor? A critical literature review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 104(12), 501-509.
  15. Hornecker, E. & Buur, J. 2006. Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. In: Procs of ACM CHI 2006. 437-446.
  16. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic books.
  17. Latour, B., 2004. Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical inquiry 30(2), 225-248.
  18. Malik, H. H., Darwood, A., … & Baskaradas, A., 2015. Three-dimensional printing in surgery: a review of current surgical applications. Journal of Surgical Research, 199(2), 512-522.
  19. McMenamin, P. G., Quayle, M. R., McHenry, C. R., & Adams, J. W., 2014. The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anatomical sciences education, 7(6), 479-486.
  20. Mitsouras, D., Liacouras, P., ... & Ho, V. B., 2015. Medical 3D printing for the radiologist. RadioGraphics, 35(7), 1965-1988.
  21. Mok, S. W., Nizak, R., ... & Malda, J., 2016. From the printer: Potential of three-dimensional printing for orthopaedic applications. Journal of Orthopaedic Translation, 6, 42-49.
  22. Pernin, J. P., Michau, F., Mandran, N., & Mariais, C. 2012. ScenLRPG, a board game for the collaborative design of GBL scenarios: qualitative analysis of an experiment. In Proc. of the 6th European Conference on Games Based Learning, 384-392.
  23. Popescu, D., Laptoiu, D., Hadar, A., Ilie, C., & Pârvu, C., 2015. Workflow for additive manufacturing of an individualized surgical template. Procs in Manufacturing Systems, 10(3), 131-140.
  24. Rengier, F., Mehndiratta, A., von Tengg-Kobligk, H., Zechmann, C. M., Unterhinninghofen, R., Kauczor, H. U., & Giesel, F. L., 2010. 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 5(4), 335-341.
  25. Rybarczyk, Y. and Fonseca, J. 2011. Tangible interface for a rehabilitation of comprehension in aphasic patients. In: Association for the Advancement of Assistive Technology in Europe.
  26. Starosolski, Z. A., Kan, J. H., Rosenfeld, S. D., Krishnamurthy, R., & Annapragada, A., 2014. Application of 3-D printing (rapid prototyping) for creating physical models of pediatric orthopaedic disorders. Pediatric radiology, 44(2), 216-221.
  27. Varela, F.J., Rosch, E., Thomson, E. 1991. The Embodied Mind. MIT Press.
  28. Vrasidas, C. (2000). Constructivism versus objectivism: Implications for interaction, course design, and evaluation in distance education. IJET, 6(4), 339-362.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Cabitza F., Locoro A., Ravarini A. and Satta V. (2016). More Time for the Doing, Having Made the Thinking - 3D Printing for Knowledge Circulation in Healthcare . In - KITA, (IC3K 2016) ISBN , pages 0-0. DOI: 10.5220/0006095402890298


in Bibtex Style

@conference{kita16,
author={Federico Cabitza and Angela Locoro and Aurelio Ravarini and Vittorio Satta},
title={More Time for the Doing, Having Made the Thinking - 3D Printing for Knowledge Circulation in Healthcare},
booktitle={ - KITA, (IC3K 2016)},
year={2016},
pages={},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0006095402890298},
isbn={},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - - KITA, (IC3K 2016)
TI - More Time for the Doing, Having Made the Thinking - 3D Printing for Knowledge Circulation in Healthcare
SN -
AU - Cabitza F.
AU - Locoro A.
AU - Ravarini A.
AU - Satta V.
PY - 2016
SP - 0
EP - 0
DO - 10.5220/0006095402890298