Comparison of Pedobarographic Profile in Young Males with Left and Right Scoliotic Posture

Igor Gruić, Karlo Cebović, Vladimir Medved

Abstract

Background: Scoliosis alters both posture and gait. Pedobarography is a biomechanical method for assessing gait that has been rarely used in scoliosis-specific gait research. Objective: To determine differences between left and right scoliotic posture in plantar pressure and force gait profile among young males. Methods: Twenty-one young, trained males assigned to one of two groups: left scoliotic posture (LSP; N=12) and right scoliotic posture (RSP; N=9) group. Subjects were assigned to a group based on forward-bending test and controlled for age, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), right and left leg length. All subjects were blinded for group they were assigned and study outcomes. Examiners were blinded for study outcomes. Subjects walked at self-selected speed along the 9,5-meter-long walkway for 2 minutes. Plantar pressures and forces were measured using pedobarographic device Zebris medical FDM 1.5. Measured outcomes during gait included: Maximum force right foot (N), Maximum force left foot (N), Maximum force at first contact right foot (N), Maximum force at first contact left foot (N), Maximum force at take-off right foot (N), Maximum force at take-off left foot (N), Maximum forefoot force right foot (N), Maximum forefoot force left foot (N), Maximum midfoot force right foot (N), Maximum midfoot force left foot (N), Maximum heel force right foot (N), Maximum heel force left foot (N), Maximum forefoot pressure right foot (N/cm2), Maximum forefoot pressure left foot (N/cm2), Maximum midfoot pressure right foot (N/cm2), Maximum midfoot pressure left foot (N/cm2), Maximum heel pressure right foot (N/cm2), Maximum heel pressure left foot (N/cm2). Results: There were no significant differences in any observed foot pressure or force gait parameter between left and right scoliotic posture group (p<0,05). Conclusion: Plantar pressure and force gait parameters seems to have no diagnostic value in determining scoliosis-specific gait. Focus should be shifted to other pedobarographic gait parameters (e.g. center of pressure, time-force parameters, etc.). Future research should investigate relationships between biomechanical movement compensation and neuromuscular, musculo-skeletal and genetic factors that may initiate scoliosis.

References

  1. Bruyneel, A.-V. Chavet, P., Bollini, G., Allard, P., Berton, E. & Mesure, S. 2009. Dynamical asymmetries in idiopathic scoliosis during forward and lateral initiation step. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 18(2), pp.188-195.
  2. Burwell, R.G., 2003. Aetiology of idiopathic scoliosis: current concepts. Pediatric rehabilitation, 6(3-4), pp.137-170.
  3. Chen, P.Q., Wang, J.L., Tsuang, Y.H., Liao, T.L., Huang, P.I. & Hang, Y.S. 1998. The postural stability control and gait pattern of idiopathic scoliosis adolescents. Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 13(1), pp. S52- S58.
  4. Chern, J.S., Kao, C.C., Lai, P.L., Lung, C.W. & Chen, W.J. 2014. Severity of spine malalignment on center of pressure progression during level walking in subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. In Conference proceedings: ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference. IEEE, pp. 5888-5891.
  5. Cheung, K.M.C., Wang, T., Qiu, G.X. & Luk, K.D. 2008. Recent advances in the aetiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. International orthopaedics, 32(6), pp.729-734.
  6. Chockalingam, N., Bandi, S., Rahmatalla, A., Dangerfield, P.H. & Ahmed, el-N. 2008. Assessment of the centre of pressure pattern and moments about S2 in scoliotic subjects during normal walking. Scoliosis, 3, p.10-15.
  7. Chockalingam, N., Dangerfield, P.H., Rahmatalla, A., Ahmed, el-N. & Cochrane T. 2004. Assessment of ground reaction force during scoliotic gait. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 13(8), pp.750-754.
  8. Chow, D.H.K., Kwok, M.L., Au-Yang, A.C., Holmes, A.D., Cheng, J.C., Yao, F.Y. & Wong, M.S. 2006. The effect of load carriage on the gait of girls with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and normal controls. Medical Engineering and Physics, 28(5), pp.430-437.
  9. Deurloo, J. & Verkerk, P., 2015. To screen or not to screen for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A review of the literature. Public Health, 129(9), pp.1267-1272.
  10. Engsberg, J.R., Bridwell, K.H., Reitenbach, A.K., Uhrich, M.L., Baldus, C., Blanke, K. & Lenke, L.G. 2001. Preoperative gait comparisons between adults undergoing long spinal deformity fusion surgery (thoracic to L4, L5, or sacrum) and controls. Spine, 26(18), pp.2020-2028.
  11. Fong, D.Y.T., Lee, C.F., Cheung, K.M., Cheng, J.C., Ng, B.K., Lam, T.P., Mak, K.H., Yip, P.S. & Luk, K.D. 2010. A meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of school scoliosis screening. Spine, 35(10), pp.1061- 1071.
  12. Fortin, C., Nadeau, S. & Labelle, H., 2008. Inter-trial and test-retest reliability of kinematic and kinetic gait parameters among subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 17(2), pp.204-216.
  13. Giacomozzi, C., 2010. Appropriateness of plantar pressure measurement devices: a comparative technical assessment. Gait & Posture, 32(1), pp.141-144.
  14. Giacomozzi, C., 2011. Potentialities and Criticalities of Plantar Pressure Measurements in the Study of Foot Biomechanics: Devices, Methodologies and Applications. In K. Vaclav, ed. Biomechanics in Applications. InTech. Available at: http://www.intechopen.com/books/biomechanics-inapplications/potentialities-and-criticalities-of-plantarpressure-measurements-in-the-study-of-footbiomechanics-.
  15. Giakas, G., Baltzopoulos, V., Dangerfield, P.H., Dorgan, J.C. & Dalmira, S. 1996. Comparison of gait patterns between healthy and scoliotic patients using time and frequency domain analysis of ground reaction forces. Spine, 21(19), pp.2235-2242.
  16. Gruic, I., Cebovic, K., Radaš, J., Bolcevic, F. & Medved., V. 2015. Pedobarographic Features of Gait Measured by FDM1.5 PMD. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, pp. 66-71.
  17. Horne, J.P., Flannery, R. & Usman, S., 2014. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: diagnosis and management. American family physician, 89(3), pp.193-8.
  18. Karimi, M.T., Kavyani, M. & Kamali, M., 2015. Balance and gait performance of scoliotic subjects: A review of the literature. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation.
  19. Ko, S., Tolea, M.I., Hausdorff, J.M. & Ferrucci, L. 2011. Sex-specific differences in gait patterns of healthy older adults: results from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Journal of biomechanics, 44(10), pp.1974- 1479.
  20. Kramers-de Quervain, I.A., Müller, R., Stacoff, A., Grob, D. & Stüssi, E. 2004. Gait analysis in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 13(5), pp.449-456.
  21. Lenke, L.G., Engsberg, J.R., Ross, S.A., Reitenbach, A., Blanke, K. & Bridwell, K.H. 2001. Prospective dynamic functional evaluation of gait and spinal balance following spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine, 26(14), pp. E330-E337.
  22. Lord, M., Reynolds, D.P. & Hughes, J.R., 1986. Foot pressure measurement: a review of clinical findings. Journal of biomedical engineering, 8(4), pp.283-294.
  23. Mahaudens, P., Banse. X., Mousny, M. & Detrembleur, C. 2009. Gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: kinematics and electromyographic analysis. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 18(4), pp.512-521.
  24. Mahaudens, P. & Mousny, M., 2010. Gait in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Kinematics, electromyographic and energy cost analysis. In Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. pp. 101-106.
  25. Park, H.J., Sim. T., Suh, S.W., Yang, J.H., Koo, H. & Mun, J.H. 2016a. Analysis of coordination between thoracic and pelvic kinematic movements during gait in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. European Spine Journal, 25(2), pp.385-393.
  26. Park, Y.S., Lim, Y.T., Koh, K., Kim, J.M., Kwon, H.J., Yang, J.S. & Shim, J.K. 2016b. Association of spinal deformity and pelvic tilt with gait asymmetry in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients: Investigation of ground reaction force. Clinical Biomechanics, 36, pp.52-57.
  27. Putti, A.B., Bochdansky. T. & Abboud, R.J. 2008. Normal pressure values and repeatability of the Emed® ST4 system. Gait & Posture, 27(3), pp.501-505.
  28. Schmid, S., Studer. D., Hasler. C.C., Romkes, J., Taylor, W.R., Lorenzetti, S. & Brunner, R. 2016. Quantifying spinal gait kinematics using an enhanced optical motion capture approach in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Gait and Posture, 44, pp.231-237.
  29. Schultz, A., 1984. Biomechanical factors in the progression of idiopathic scoliosis. Annals of biomedical engineering, 12(6), pp.621-630.
  30. Simon, A., Ilharreborde, B., Souchet, P. & Kaufman, K.R. 2015. Dynamic balance assessment during gait in spinal pathologies - a literature review. Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research, 101(2), pp.235- 246.
  31. Song, K.M., Halliday, S.E. & Little, D.G., 1997. The effect of limb-length discrepancy on gait. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume, 79(11), pp.1690- 1698.
  32. Syczewska, M., Graff, K., Kalinowska. M., Szczerbik, E. & Domaniecki, J. 2012. Influence of the structural deformity of the spine on the gait pathology in scoliotic patients. Gait & Posture, 35(2), pp.209-213.
  33. Syczewska, M., Graff, K., Kalinowska, M., Szczerbik, E. & Domaniecki, J. 2010. Does the gait pathology in scoliotic patients depend on the severity of spine deformity? preliminary results. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics, 12(1), pp.25-28.
  34. Veldhuizen, A.G., Wever, D.J. & Webb, P.J., 2000. The aetiology of idiopathic scoliosis: biomechanical and neuromuscular factors. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 9(3), pp.178-184.
  35. Yang, J.H., Suh, S.W., Sung, P.S. & Park, W.H. 2013. Asymmetrical gait in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. European spine journal: official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 22(11), pp.2407- 2413.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Gruić I., Cebović K. and Medved V. (2016). Comparison of Pedobarographic Profile in Young Males with Left and Right Scoliotic Posture . In Proceedings of the 4th International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support - Volume 1: icSPORTS, ISBN 978-989-758-205-9, pages 89-95. DOI: 10.5220/0006085400890095


in Bibtex Style

@conference{icsports16,
author={Igor Gruić and Karlo Cebović and Vladimir Medved},
title={Comparison of Pedobarographic Profile in Young Males with Left and Right Scoliotic Posture},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 4th International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support - Volume 1: icSPORTS,},
year={2016},
pages={89-95},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0006085400890095},
isbn={978-989-758-205-9},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 4th International Congress on Sport Sciences Research and Technology Support - Volume 1: icSPORTS,
TI - Comparison of Pedobarographic Profile in Young Males with Left and Right Scoliotic Posture
SN - 978-989-758-205-9
AU - Gruić I.
AU - Cebović K.
AU - Medved V.
PY - 2016
SP - 89
EP - 95
DO - 10.5220/0006085400890095