Cost Model Approach for Next Generation Emergency Call Systems - Italy Case Study

Ahmet Apak, Ilker Ustoglu

Abstract

Next generation emergency notification system after emergency call (eCall) equipped vehicle regulations with the legislation EU-2015/758 is analysed via optimal architecture selection with the study of cost modelling for the “Emergency Calls EROs Handling” model of European Emergency Number Association (EENA) which is applied in Italy, Austria, France, Germany and Norway. According to EU-Regulation 2015/758, public safety answering points (PSAPs) need to be ready for the new model system with the start date of 1st October 2017 while eCall-equipped vehicles are started to be produced at the end of March 2018. With this regulation, infrastructure and working procedure of eCall systems as well as eCall equipments and related vehicle structures will be updated or modified as an obligation. According to status of most appropriate 112 PSAPs, there may be an adaptation of manual eCall PSAPs, auto eCall PSAPs. In this paper, the optimal architecture of the system in Italy is discussed and the next generation crash notification systems for current “Emergency Calls EROs Handling” model are defined.

References

  1. OECD, 2014, “IRTAD Road Safety Annual Report, 2014”, pp.-13-15; pp.-281-290
  2. ERTICO, 2014, “Harmonised Ecall European Pilot Final Report 1”, HeERO Project, pp-29-30.
  3. REA Agency, 2015, 'Policy for Travel Expenses', European Commission Research Directorate General pp.2
  4. 'EENA Standarts', http://www.eena.org/pages/ng112#.VoI47-iLTIU accessed 29 December 2015
  5. L. R. Kimball, 2011, “Next Generation 9-1-1 Cost Analyses”, State of Oregon Office of Emergency Management, pp-20-28.
  6. Johannes Abele, Christiane Kerlen, Sven Krueger, 2005, “Exploratory Study on the potential socio-economic impact of the introduction of Intelligent Safety Systems in Road Vehicles” VDI,VDE,IT-IfV Köln, pp-25, 69.
  7. D. P. Bowyer, R. Akçelik, D. C. Biggs, 1985, ARRB Transport Research Ltd. “Guide to Fuel Consumption Analysis for Urban Traffic Management”, pp.28-30.
  8. 'Continental, Worldwide Emission Standarts and Related Regulations March 2015 Passener Cars, Ligth and Mediun
  9. DutyVehicles'http://www.contionline.com/www/downloa d/automotive_de_en/general/contact_services/downloa ds/commercial_vehicles/powertrain/common/pow_emi ssion_booklet_pdf_en.pdf accessed 28 December 2015
  10. ACEA, 2004, “New PC registrations by country, Historical series 1990-2004”
  11. L. R. Kimball Agency, 2012, 'Consolidation Feasibility Study', Office of Statewide Emergency Telecommunications State of Connecticut
  12. Russ Russell, 2003, 'SME 911 Consulting - PSAP Stuffing Guidelines Worksheet: PSAP RequirementsNENA Standarts' http://www.nena.org/?page= Standards. pp.1-4.
  13. André, M./Hammerström, U./Reynaud, I.,1999, “Driving Statistics for the Assessment of Pollutant Emissions from Road Transport” Inrets,Bron,Report LTE 9906,pp.170-172.
  14. Kristian Bodek, John Heywood, March 2008, 'Europe's Evolving Passenger Vehicle Fleet: Fuel Use and GHG Emission Scenarios through 2035, MIT Laboratory for the Energy and Environment, pp.29-31.
  15. Shane B. McLaughlin, 2007, 'Analytic Assessment of Collision Avoidance Systems and Driver Dynamic Performance in Rear-End Crashes and Near-Crashes' PHD Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
  16. E-MERGE Project,2004, “Cap Gemini Ernst & Young, EMERGE Compiled Evaluation Results, Deliverable 6.3.”
  17. 'Italy Population Rates-County and City population data' http://www.citypopulation.de/Italy.html Accessed 5 January 2016
  18. 'European Commission ExternE programme' https://ec.europa.eu/research/energy/pdf/kina_en.pdf accessed 29 December 2015
  19. 'Italy Road Rates - The World Factbook Publications' https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-worldfactbook/fields/2085.html ; accessed 29 November 2015
  20. EU Parliament and Council of EU, 2015, 'REGULATION (EU) 2015/758 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL', Office Journal of the European Union, 29 April 2015, pp. L123/77-L123/89
  21. European Commission, 2003a, “Extended impact assessment of the proposal for a decision amending Decision No 1692/96/EC on the trans-European transport network”, Commission Staff Working Paper, SEC-2003 1060, Brussels 01.10.2003.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Apak A. and Ustoglu I. (2016). Cost Model Approach for Next Generation Emergency Call Systems - Italy Case Study . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems - Volume 1: VEHITS, ISBN 978-989-758-185-4, pages 130-137. DOI: 10.5220/0005908001300137


in Bibtex Style

@conference{vehits16,
author={Ahmet Apak and Ilker Ustoglu},
title={Cost Model Approach for Next Generation Emergency Call Systems - Italy Case Study},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems - Volume 1: VEHITS,},
year={2016},
pages={130-137},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005908001300137},
isbn={978-989-758-185-4},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Vehicle Technology and Intelligent Transport Systems - Volume 1: VEHITS,
TI - Cost Model Approach for Next Generation Emergency Call Systems - Italy Case Study
SN - 978-989-758-185-4
AU - Apak A.
AU - Ustoglu I.
PY - 2016
SP - 130
EP - 137
DO - 10.5220/0005908001300137