Continuous Improvement of Proactive Event-driven Decision Making through Sensor-Enabled Feedback (SEF)

Alexandros Bousdekis, Nikos Papageorgiou, Babis Magoutas, Dimitris Apostolou, Gregoris Mentzas

Abstract

The incorporation of feedback in the proactive event-driven decision making can improve the recommendations generated and be used to inform users online about the impact of the recommended action following its implementation. We propose an approach for learning cost functions from Sensor-Enabled Feedback (SEF) for the continuous improvement of proactive event-driven decision making. We suggest using Kalman Filter, dynamic Curve Fitting and Extrapolation to update online (i.e. during action implementation) cost functions of actions, with the aim to improve the parameters taken into account for generating recommendations and thus, the recommendations themselves. We implemented our approach in a real proactive manufacturing scenario and we conducted extensive experiments in order to validate its effectiveness.

References

  1. Amorim-Melo, P., Shehab, E., Kirkwood, L., Baguley, P. (2014). Cost Drivers of Integrated Maintenance in High-value Systems. Procedia CIRP, 22, 152-156.
  2. Bousdekis, A., Papageorgiou, N., Magoutas, B., Apostolou, D., Mentzas, G., 2015. A Real-Time Architecture for Proactive Decision Making in Manufacturing Enterprises. In On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2015 Workshops (pp. 137-146). Springer International Publishing.
  3. Brezinski, C., Zaglia, M. R., 2013. Extrapolation methods: theory and practice. Elsevier.
  4. Burmen, Á., Puhan, J., Tuma, T., 2006. Grid restrained nelder-mead algorithm. Computational Optimization and Applications, 34(3), 359-375.
  5. Chen, X., Huang, J., Wang, Y., Tao, C., 2012. Incremental feedback learning methods for voice recognition based on DTW. In Modelling, Identification & Control (ICMIC), 2012 Proceedings of International Conference on (pp. 1011-1016). IEEE.
  6. Engel, Y., Etzion, O., Feldman, Z., 2012. A basic model for proactive event-driven computing. In 6th ACM Conf. on Distributed Event-Based Systems, pp. 107- 118, ACM.
  7. Ertürk, S., 2002. Real-time digital image stabilization using Kalman filters. Real-Time Imaging, 8(4), 317- 328.
  8. Kalman, R. E., 1960. A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 82(1), 35-45.
  9. Kandepu, R., Foss, B., & Imsland, L. (2008). Applying the unscented Kalman filter for nonlinear state estimation. Journal of Process Control, 18(7), 753-768.
  10. Lee, J. H., Lee, K. S., 2007. Iterative learning control applied to batch processes: An overview. Control Engineering Practice, 15(10), 1306-1318.
  11. Lewis, F. L., Vrabie, D., & Vamvoudakis, K. G. (2012). Reinforcement learning and feedback control: Using natural decision methods to design optimal adaptive controllers. Control Systems, IEEE, 32(6), 76-105.
  12. Lourakis, M. I., 2005. A brief description of the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm implemented by levmar.Foundation of Research and Technology,4,1-6.
  13. Montgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A., Vining, G. G., 2012. Introduction to linear regression analysis (Vol. 821). John Wiley & Sons.
  14. Sai Kiran, P. V. R., Vijayaramkumar, S., Vijayakumar, P. S., Varakhedi, V., Upendranath, V., 2013. Application of Kalman Filter to prognostic method for estimating the RUL of a bridge rectifier. In Emerging Trends in Communication, Control, Signal Processing & Computing Applications (C2SPCA), 2013 International Conference on (pp. 1-9). IEEE.
  15. Tang, Y., Wang, Z., Fang, J. A., 2011. Feedback learning particle swarm optimization. Applied Soft Computing, 11(8), 4713-4725.
  16. Vohnout, K. D., 2003. Curve fitting and evaluation. Mathematical Modeling for System Analysis in Agricultural Research, 140-178.
  17. Willmott, C. J., & Matsuura, K. (2005). Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Climate research, 30(1), 79.
  18. Won, S. H. P., Melek, W. W., Golnaraghi, F. (2010). A Kalman/particle filter-based position and orientation estimation method using a position sensor/inertial measurement unit hybrid system. Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, 57(5), 1787-1798.
  19. Yunfeng, L., 2013. The improved Kalman filter algorithm based on curve fitting. In Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering (ICIII), 2013 6th International Conference on (Vol. 1, pp. 341-343). IEEE.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Bousdekis A., Papageorgiou N., Magoutas B., Apostolou D. and Mentzas G. (2016). Continuous Improvement of Proactive Event-driven Decision Making through Sensor-Enabled Feedback (SEF) . In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-758-187-8, pages 166-173. DOI: 10.5220/0005866701660173


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis16,
author={Alexandros Bousdekis and Nikos Papageorgiou and Babis Magoutas and Dimitris Apostolou and Gregoris Mentzas},
title={Continuous Improvement of Proactive Event-driven Decision Making through Sensor-Enabled Feedback (SEF)},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS,},
year={2016},
pages={166-173},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005866701660173},
isbn={978-989-758-187-8},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS,
TI - Continuous Improvement of Proactive Event-driven Decision Making through Sensor-Enabled Feedback (SEF)
SN - 978-989-758-187-8
AU - Bousdekis A.
AU - Papageorgiou N.
AU - Magoutas B.
AU - Apostolou D.
AU - Mentzas G.
PY - 2016
SP - 166
EP - 173
DO - 10.5220/0005866701660173