Mitigating Enterprise Architecture Adoption Challenges - Improved EA Adoption Method

Nestori Syynimaa

Abstract

During the last decades the interest towards Enterprise Architecture (EA) has increased among both practitioners and scholars. One of the reason behind this interest is the anticipated benefits resulting from its adoption. EA has been argued to reduce costs, standardise technology, improve processes, and provide strategic differentiation. Despite these benefits the EA adoption rate and maturity are low and, consequently, the benefits are not realised. The support of top-management has been found to be a critical success factor for EA adoption. However, EA is often not properly understood by top-management. This is problematic as the value of EA depends on how it is understood. This paper aims for minimising the effect of this deficiency by proposing Enterprise Architecture Adoption Method (EAAM). EAAM improves the traditional EA adoption method by introducing processes helping to secure the support of top-management and to increase EA understanding. EAAM is built using Design Science approach and evaluated using Delphi.

References

  1. Agarwal, R. (2000). Individual acceptance of information technologies. In: Zmud, R. W. (ed.) Framing the domains of IT management: Projecting the future through the past. Cincinnati, OH: Pinnaflex Education Resources.
  2. Bass, B. M. (1990). From Transactional to Transformational Leadership: Learning to Share the Vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18, 19-31.
  3. Beer, M. & Nohria, N. (2000). Cracking the code of change. Harvard Business Review, 78(3), 133-141.
  4. Bernard, S. (2012). An Introduction To Enterprise Architecture. Bloomington, IN, USA: AuthorHouse.
  5. Bunge, M. (1966). Technology as Applied Science. Technology and Culture, 7(3), 329-347.
  6. Burnes, B. & James, H. (1995). Culture, cognitive dissonance and the management of change. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(8), 14-33.
  7. Cannon-Bowers, J. A. & Salas, E. (2001). Reflections on Shared Cognition. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 195-202.
  8. Carrillo, J., Cabrera, A., Román, C., Abad, M. & Jaramillo, D. (2010). Roadmap for the implementation of an enterprise architecture framework oriented to institutions of higher education in Ecuador. In: Software Technology and Engineering (ICSTE), 2010 2nd International Conference on, 2010. IEEE, V2-7- V2-11.
  9. CIO Council (2001). A Practical Guide to Federal Enterprise Architecture. Available at http://www.cio.go v/documents/bpeaguide.pdf.
  10. Computer Economics. (2014). Enterprise Architecture Adoption and Best Practices. April 2014. URL: http://www.computereconomics.com/article.cfm?id=1 947 [Jan 21st 2015].
  11. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Academy of management review, 522-537.
  12. Davison, R. M., Martinsons, M. G. & N, K. (2004). Principles of Canonical Action Research. Information Systems Journal, 14(1), 65-86.
  13. Dietz, J. L. G., Hoogervorst, J. A. P., Albani, A., Aveiro, D., Babkin, E., Barjis, J., Caetano, A., Huysmans, P., Iijima, J., van Kervel, S. J. H., Mulder, H., Op 't Land, M., Proper, H. A., Sanz, J., Terlouw, L., Tribolet, J., Verelst, J. & Winter, R. (2013). The discipline of enterprise engineering. Int. J. Organisational Design and Engineering, 3(1), 86-114.
  14. Elving, W. J. L. (2005). The role of communication in organisational change. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 10(2), 129-138.
  15. Espinosa, J. A., Armour, F. & Boh, W. F. (2011). The Role of Group Cognition in Enterprise Architecting. In: System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on, 4-7 Jan. 2011 2011. 1-10.
  16. Fehskens, L. (2015). Len's Lens: Eight Ways We Frame Our Concepts of Architecture. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 11(2), 55-59.
  17. Finnish Ministry of Finance. (2011). Act on Information Management Governance in Public Administration (643/2011). URL: https://www.vm.fi/vm/en/04_public ations_and_documents/03_documents/20110902Acton I/Tietohallintolaki_englanniksi.pdf.
  18. Finnish Ministry of Finance (2015). Tietoja valtion tietohallinnosta 2014. Valtiovarainministeriön julkaisuja 27/2015. Helsinki: Ministry of Finance.
  19. Gartner. (2013). IT Glossary: Enterprise Architecture (EA). URL: http://www.gartner.com/it-glossary/enterprisearchitecture-ea/ [21.02.2013].
  20. Gregor, S., Hart, D. & Martin, N. (2007). Enterprise architectures: enablers of business strategy and IS/IT alignment in government. Information Technology & People, 20(2), 96-120.
  21. Hammer, M. & Champy, J. (1993). Reengineering the corporation: a manifesto for business revolution. London: Nicholas Brearly.
  22. Hazen, B. T., Kung, L., Cegielski, C. G. & Jones-Farmer, L. A. (2014). Performance expectancy and use of enterprise architecture: training as an intervention. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 27(2), 6-6.
  23. Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J. & Ram, S. (2004). Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75-106.
  24. Hiekkanen, K., Korhonen, J. J., Collin, J., Patricio, E., Helenius, M. & Mykkanen, J. (2013). Architects' Perceptions on EA Use -- An Empirical Study. In: Business Informatics (CBI), 2013 IEEE 15th Conference on, 15-18 July 2013 2013. 292-297.
  25. Hjort-Madsen, K. (2006). Enterprise Architecture Implementation and Management: A Case Study on Interoperability. In: HICSS-39. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2006 Kauai, Hawaii, USA.
  26. Holt, D. T., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S. & Harris, S. G. (2007). Readiness for Organizational Change: The Systematic Development of a Scale. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(2), 232-255.
  27. Houkes, W. N. (2013). Rules, Plans and the Normativity of Technological Knowledge. In: de Vries, M. J., Hansson, S. O. & Meijers, A. W. M. (eds.) Norms in Technology. Springer.
  28. ISO/IEC/IEEE (2011). Systems and software engineering - - Architecture description. ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011(E) (Revision of ISO/IEC 42010:2007 and IEEE Std 1471-2000).
  29. Iyamu, T. (2009). The Factors Affecting Institutionalisation of Enterprise Architecture in the Organisation. In: Commerce and Enterprise Computing, 2009. CEC 7809. IEEE Conference on, 20-23 July 2009 2009. 221-225.
  30. Iyamu, T. (2011). Enterprise Architecture as Information Technology Strategy. In: Commerce and Enterprise Computing (CEC), 2011 IEEE 13th Conference on, 5- 7 Sept. 2011 2011. 82-88.
  31. Jones, R. A., Jimmieson, N. L. & Griffiths, A. (2005). The Impact of Organizational Culture and Reshaping Capabilities on Change Implementation Success: The Mediating Role of Readiness for Change. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 361-386.
  32. Järvinen, P. (2015). On Design Research - Some Questions and Answers. In: Matulevicius, R. & Dumas, M. (eds.) Perspectives in Business Informatics Research. Springer International Publishing.
  33. Kaisler, H., Armour, F. & Valivullah, M. (2005). Enterprise Architecting: Critical Problems. In: HICSS-38. Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2005 Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA.
  34. Kitchen, P. J. & Daly, F. (2002). Internal communication during change management. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 7(1), 46-53.
  35. Knowles, M. S. (1970). The Modern Practice of Adult Education. New York: New York Association Press.
  36. Koponen, E. (2009). The development, implementation and use of e-learning: critical realism and design science perspectives. Acta Electronica Universitatis Tamperensis: 805. Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere.
  37. Kotter, J. P. (2008). A sense of urgency. Harvard Business Press.
  38. Lee, A. S. (2004). Thinking about Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems. In: Mingers, J. & Willcocks, L. (eds.) Social Theory and Philosophy for Information Systems. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  39. Lee, A. S. (2010). Retrospect and prospect: information systems research in the last and next 25 years. Journal of Information Technology, 25, 336-348.
  40. Lee, A. S., Manoj, T. A. & Baskerville, R. L. (2015). Going back to basics in design science: from the information technology artifact to the information systems artifact. Information Systems Journal, 2015(25), 5-21.
  41. Lemmetti, J. & Pekkola, S. (2012). Understanding Enterprise Architecture: Perceptions by the Finnish Public Sector. In: Scholl, H., Janssen, M., Wimmer, M., Moe, C. & Flak, L. (eds.) Electronic Government. Berlin: Springer.
  42. Liu, Y. & Li, H. (2009). Applying Enterprise Architecture in China E-Government: A Case of Implementing Government-Led Credit Information System of Yiwu. In: WHICEB2009. Eighth Wuhan International Conference on E-Business, 2009 Wuhan, China. 538- 545.
  43. Makiya, G. K. (2012). A multi-level investigation into the antecedents of Enterprise Architecture (EA) assimilation in the U.S. federal government: a longitudinal mixed methods research study. 3530104 Ph.D., Case Western Reserve University.
  44. March, S. T. & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15(4), 251-266.
  45. Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative Learning: Theory to Practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, no. 74, 5-12.
  46. Mezzanotte, D. M., Dehlinger, J. & Chakraborty, S. (2010). On Applying the Theory of Structuration in Enterprise Architecture Design. In: Computer and Information Science (ICIS), 2010 IEEE/ACIS 9th International Conference on, 18-20 Aug. 2010 2010. 859-863.
  47. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B. & Lampel, J. (1998). Strategy Safari: the Complete Guide Trough the Wilds of Strategic Management. London: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
  48. Nassiff, E. (2012). Understanding the Value of Enterprise Architecture for Organizations: A Grounded Theory Approach. 3523496 Ph.D., Nova Southeastern University.
  49. North, E., North, J. & Benade, S. (2004). Information Management and Enterprise Architecture Planning--A Juxtaposition. Problems and Perspectives in Management, (4), 166-179.
  50. Oxford Dictionaries. (2010). Oxford Dictionaries. April 2010. URL: http://oxforddictionaries.com/ [Nov 18th 2014].
  51. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A. & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of management information systems, 45-77.
  52. Pehkonen, J. (2013). Early Phase Challenges and Solutions in Enterprise Architecture of Public Sector. Master's Degree Programme in Information and Knowledge Management, Tampere University of Technology.
  53. Päivärinta, T., Pekkola, S. & Moe, C. E. (2011). Grounding Theory from Delphi Studies. Thirty Second International Conference on Information Systems. Shanghai.
  54. Ross, J. W., Weill, P. & Robertson, D. C. (2006). Enterprise architecture as strategy: Creating a foundation for business execution. Boston, Massachusetts, USA: Harvard Business School Press.
  55. Schekkerman, J. (2005). Trends in Enterprise Architecture 2005: How are Organizations Progressing? Amersfoort, Netherlands: Institute for Enterprise Architecture Developments.
  56. Schulman, J. (2003). Enterprise Architecture: Benefits and Justification. URL: https://www.gartner.com/doc/3882 68/enterprise-architecture-benefits-justification.
  57. Sembiring, J., Nuryatno, E. T. & Gondokaryono, Y. S. (2011). Analyzing the Indicators and Requirements in Main Components Of Enterprise Architecture Methodology Development Using Grounded Theory in Qualitative Methods. Society of Interdisciplinary Business Research Conference. Bangkok.
  58. Seppänen, V. (2014). From problems to critical success factors of enterprise architecture adoption. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
  59. Shupe, C. & Behling, R. (2006). Developing and Implementing a Strategy for Technology Deployment. Information Management Journal, 40(4), 52-57.
  60. Skulmoski, G. J., Hartman, F. T. & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi Method for Graduate Research. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6(1), 1-21.
  61. Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the Theory of Scales of Measurement. Science, New Series, 103(2684), 677- 680.
  62. Struijs, P., Camstra, A., Renssen, R. & Braaksma, B. (2013). Redesign of Statistics Production within an Architectural Framework: The Dutch Experience. Journal of Official Statistics, 29(1), 49-71.
  63. Syynimaa, N. (2013). Theoretical Perspectives of Enterprise Architecture. 4th Nordic EA Summer School, EASS 2013. Helsinki, Finland.
  64. Syynimaa, N. (2015). Modelling the Resistance of Enterprise Architecture Adoption: Linking Strategic Level of Enterprise Architecture to Organisational Changes and Change Resistance. In: Hammoudi, S., Maciaszek, L. & Teniente, E., eds. 17th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2015), 2015 Barcelona, Spain. INSTICC, 143-153.
  65. TOGAF (2009). TOGAF Version 9. Van Haren Publishing.
  66. Vaishnavi, V. & Kuechler, B. (2013). Design Science Research in Information Systems. URL: http://desrist.o rg/desrist/.
  67. Valtonen, K., Mäntynen, S., Leppänen, M. & Pulkkinen, M. (2011). Enterprise Architecture Descriptions for Enhancing Local Government Transformation and Coherency Management: Case Study. In: Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (EDOCW), 2011 15th IEEE International, Aug 29-Sep 2 2011. 360-369.
  68. van Aken, J. E. (2004). Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for FieldTested and Grounded Technological Rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 219-246.
  69. van de Ven, A. H. & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining Development and Change in Organizations. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 510-540.
  70. Washington, M. & Hacker, M. (2005). Why change fails: knowledge counts. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(5), 400-411.
  71. Vasilescu, C. (2012). General Enterprise Architecture Concepts and the Benefits for an Organization. 7th International Scientific Conference, Defence Resources Management in the 21st Century. Brasov: Romanian National Defence University, Regional Department of Defence Resources Management Studies.
  72. Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J. & Baskerville, R. (2012). A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluation in Design Science Research. In: Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M. & Kuechler, B. (eds.) Design Science Research in Information Systems. Advances in Theory and Practice. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  73. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
  74. Vera, D. & Crossan, M. (2004). Strategic Leadership and Organizational Learning. The Academy of Management Review, 29(2), 222-240.
  75. Zachman, J. A. (1997). Enterprise architecture: The issue of the century. Database Programming and Design, 10(3), 44-53.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Syynimaa N. (2016). Mitigating Enterprise Architecture Adoption Challenges - Improved EA Adoption Method . In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-758-187-8, pages 506-517. DOI: 10.5220/0005860405060517


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis16,
author={Nestori Syynimaa},
title={Mitigating Enterprise Architecture Adoption Challenges - Improved EA Adoption Method},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS,},
year={2016},
pages={506-517},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005860405060517},
isbn={978-989-758-187-8},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS,
TI - Mitigating Enterprise Architecture Adoption Challenges - Improved EA Adoption Method
SN - 978-989-758-187-8
AU - Syynimaa N.
PY - 2016
SP - 506
EP - 517
DO - 10.5220/0005860405060517