Becoming Agile in a Non-disruptive Way - Is It Possible?

Ilia Bider, Oscar Söderberg

Abstract

Due to the increasing popularity of Agile Software Development (ASD), more software development teams are planning to transit to ASD. As ASD substantially differs from the traditional Software Development (TSD), there are a number of issues and challenges that needs to be overcome when transiting to ASD. One of the most difficult challenges here is acquiring an agile “mindset”. The question arises whether it is possible to acquire this mindset with the minimum disruption of an already established TSD process. The paper tries to answer this question by developing a non-disruptive method of transition to ASD, while using a knowledge transformation perspective to identify the main features of ASD mindset and how it differs from the one of TSD. To map the current mindset and plan the movement to the mindset that is more agile, the paper suggests using a process modelling technique that considers the development process as a socio-technical system with components that correspond to the phases of the development process. The method suggested in the paper has been designed in connection to a business case of a development team interested to transit to agility in a non-disruptive manner.

References

  1. Agile Alliance, 2001. Manifesto for Agile Software Development. (Online) Available at: http:// agilemanifesto.org (Accessed 10 October 2013).
  2. Baskerville, R.L., Pries-Heje, J. & Venable, J., 2009. Soft Design Science Methodology. In DERIST 2009. ACM, pp.1-11.
  3. Bider, I., 2014. Analysis of Agile Software Development from the Knowledge Transformation Perspective. In Johansson, B., ed. 13th International Conference on Perspectives in Business Informatics Research (BIR 2014). Lund, Sweden. Springer, LNBIP 194, pp.143- 57.
  4. Bider, I., Johannesson, P. & Perjons, E., 2013. Design science research as movement between individual and generic situation-problem-solution spaces. In Baskerville, R., De Marco, M. & and Spagnoletti, P. Organizational Systems. An Interdisciplinary Discourse. Springer. pp.35-61.
  5. Bider, I. & Otto, H., 2015. Modeling a Global Software Development Project as a Complex Socio-Technical System to Facilitate Risk Management and Improve the Project Structure. In Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering (ICGSE), forthcoming. Ciudad Real, Spain. IEEE.
  6. Bider, I. & Perjons, E., 2015. Design science in action: developing a modeling technique for eliciting requirements on business process management (BPM) tools. Software & Systems Modeling, 14(3), pp.1159- 88.
  7. Conboy, K., Coyle, S., Wang, X. & Pikkarainen, M., 2011. People over Process: Key Challenges in Agile Development. IEEE Software, 28(4), pp.48-57.
  8. Conboy, K. & Fitzgerald, B., 2004. Toward a conceptual framework of agile methods: a study of agility in different disciplines. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM workshop on Interdisciplinary software engineering research. Newport Beach. ACM, pp.37-44.
  9. Davis, F.D., 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), pp.319-40.
  10. Hajjdiab, H. & Taleb, A., 2011. Adopting Agile Software Development: Issues and Challenges. IJMVSC, 2(3), pp.1-10.
  11. Highsmith, J., Orr, K. & Cockburn, A., 2000. E-Business Application Delivery, pp. 4-17. (Online) Available at: www.cutter.com/freestuff/ead0002.pdf .
  12. Hunt, A., 2015. The Failure of Agile. (Online) Available at: http://blog.toolshed.com/2015/05/the-failure-ofagile.html (Accessed October 2015).
  13. Nonaka, I., 1994. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ. Sci., 5(1), pp.14-37.
  14. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A. & Chatterjee, S., 2007. A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), pp.45-78.
  15. Regev, G., 2015. Fundamental Systems Thinking Concepts for IS Engineering: Balancing between Change and Non-change. (Online) Stockholm University Available at: http://sched.co/2OGV (Accessed October 2015).
  16. Sidky, A., 2007. A structured Approach to Adopting Agile Practices: The Agile Adoption Framework. PhD Thesis. (Online) VirginiaTech Available at: http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd05252007-110748/ (Accessed October 2015).
  17. Smith, G. & Sidky, A., 2009. Becoming Agile. Greenwich, CT: Manning.
  18. Weaver, M., 2011. Do you agree or disagree that Scrum is not Agile? (Online) Available at: http:// www.linkedin.com/groups/Do-you-agree-disagreethat-81780.S.52354777 (Accessed April 2014).
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Bider I. and Söderberg O. (2016). Becoming Agile in a Non-disruptive Way - Is It Possible? . In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-758-187-8, pages 294-305. DOI: 10.5220/0005785302940305


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis16,
author={Ilia Bider and Oscar Söderberg},
title={Becoming Agile in a Non-disruptive Way - Is It Possible?},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS,},
year={2016},
pages={294-305},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005785302940305},
isbn={978-989-758-187-8},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 1: ICEIS,
TI - Becoming Agile in a Non-disruptive Way - Is It Possible?
SN - 978-989-758-187-8
AU - Bider I.
AU - Söderberg O.
PY - 2016
SP - 294
EP - 305
DO - 10.5220/0005785302940305