SRECMATs - An Intelligent Tutoring System to Deliver Online Materials for Student Revision

Petch Sajjacholapunt, Mike Joy


The use of online course material is the approach adopted by most universities to support students’ revision, and teachers usually have the responsibility for designing or uploading online materials on their own course websites. However, some teachers might lack programming skills or motivation, and most current online materials are just uploaded in a static format (such as PDF) which is not suitable for all students. Moreover, during revision periods students may be faced with a lot of unorganised materials to be revised in a short period of time, and this can lead to an ineffective revision process. In order to address these issues, this paper proposes a software framework that aims to maximise the benefit of current online materials when used to support student revision. This framework is called SRECMATs (Self-Revision E-Course MATerials) and has been deployed as a tool that allows teachers to automatically create an intelligent tutoring system to manage online materials without any programming knowledge, and to support students to navigate easily through these online materials during their revision. This paper evaluates the proposed framework in order to understand students’ perceptions with regard to the use of the system prototype, and the results indicate which features are suitable for providing online revision materials as well as confirming the benefit of the revision framework.


  1. Baeza-Yates, R. and Ribeiro-Neto, B. (2011). Modern Information Retrieval: The Concepts and Technology behind Search (2nd Edition) (ACM Press Books). Addison-Wesley Professional, 2 edition.
  2. Entwistle, N. and Entwistle, A. (1991). Contrasting forms of understanding for degree examinations: the student experience and its implications. Higher Education, 22(3):205-227.
  3. Forsyth, I. (2014). Teaching and learning materials and the Internet. Routledge.
  4. Harper, B., Hedberg, J., Corderoy, B., and Wright, R. (2000). Employing cognitive tools within interactive multimedia applications. Computers as cognitive tools, volume two: No more walls, pages 227-245.
  5. Hornbaek, K. and Frøkjaer, E. (2001). Reading of electronic documents: the usability of linear, fisheye, and overview+ detail interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 293-300. ACM.
  6. Iiyoshi, T., Hannafin, M. J., and Wang, F. (2005). Cognitive tools and studentcentred learning: rethinking tools, functions and applications. Educational Media International, 42(4):281-296.
  7. Jonassen, D. H. and Carr, C. S. (2000). Mindtools: Affording multiple knowledge representations for learning. Computers as cognitive tools, 2:165-196.
  8. Kim, B. and Reeves, T. (2007). Reframing research on learning with technology: in search of the meaning of cognitive tools. Instructional Science, 35(3):207-256.
  9. Marton, F. and Säaljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learningii outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task. british Journal of educational Psychology, 46(2):115-127.
  10. Nicholas, C. (2010). The web shatters focus, rewires brains.
  11. Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H. R., Rowlands, I., and Fieldhouse, M. (2009). Student digital information-seeking behaviour in context. Journal of Documentation, 65(1):106-132.
  12. Nicol, D., Littlejohn, A., and Grierson, H. (2005). The importance of structuring information and resources within shared workspaces during collaborative design learning. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-learning, 20(1):31-49.
  13. Nielsen, J. (2008). How little do users read?; 4 May 2009.
  14. Orey, M. (2001). Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology.
  15. Page, T. (2014). Skeuomorphism or flat design: future directions in mobile device user interface (ui) design education. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(2):130-142.
  16. Pazienza, M., Pennacchiotti, M., and Zanzotto, F. (2005). Terminology extraction: An analysis of linguistic and statistical approaches. In Sirmakessis, S., editor, Knowledge Mining, volume 185 of Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, pages 255-279. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  17. Quesenbery, W. (2001). What does usability mean: Looking beyond 'ease of use'. In Annual ConferenceSociety for Technical Communication, volume 48, pages 432-436.
  18. Sajjacholapunt, P. and Joy, M. (2014). Exploring patterns of using learning resources as a guideline to improve self-revision. INTED2014 Proceedings, pages 5263- 5271.
  19. Sajjacholapunt, P. and Joy, M. (2015). Analysing features of lecture slides and past exam paper materials - towards automatic associating e-materials for self-revision. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer Supported Education, pages 169-176.
  20. Salton, G. and Buckley, C. (1988). Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 24(5):513 - 523.
  21. Shim, J. E. and Li, Y. (2006). Applications of cognitive tools in the classroom.
  22. Slotta, J. D. and Linn, M. C. (2000). The knowledge integration environment: Helping students use the internet effectively. Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning, pages 193-226.
  23. Weinreich, H., Obendorf, H., Herder, E., and Mayer, M. (2008). Not quite the average: An empirical study of web use. ACM Transactions on the Web, 2(1):1-31.
  24. Williams, C. (2002). Learning on-line: A review of recent literature in a rapidly expanding field. Journal of further and Higher Education, 26(3):263-272.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Sajjacholapunt P. and Joy M. (2016). SRECMATs - An Intelligent Tutoring System to Deliver Online Materials for Student Revision . In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-179-3, pages 67-74. DOI: 10.5220/0005783800670074

in Bibtex Style

author={Petch Sajjacholapunt and Mike Joy},
title={SRECMATs - An Intelligent Tutoring System to Deliver Online Materials for Student Revision},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,
TI - SRECMATs - An Intelligent Tutoring System to Deliver Online Materials for Student Revision
SN - 978-989-758-179-3
AU - Sajjacholapunt P.
AU - Joy M.
PY - 2016
SP - 67
EP - 74
DO - 10.5220/0005783800670074