Visual Analytics Towards Tool Interoperabilty - A Position Paper

Didem Gürdür, Fredrik Asplund, Jad El-khoury, Frederic Loiret, Martin Törngren


Complex-engineering projects include artefacts from several engineering disciplines such as mechanical, electrical, software components, processes and plans. While software tools can be powerful in each individual discipline, it is difficult to build integrated tool chains. Moreover, it is challenging to evaluate and update existing tool chains. At the same time, the field of visualization is getting mature and visual analytics promises an opportunity to develop knowledge, methods, technologies and practice for exploiting and combining the strengths of human and data. We consider this as a potential to evaluate current tool chains. This position paper discusses the visualization and visual analytics practices to assess existing tool chains performance.


  1. Altintas, I., Berkley, C., Jaeger, E., Jones, M., Ludascher, B. and Mock, S., 2004, June. Kepler: an extensible system for design and execution of scientific workflows. In Scientific and Statistical Database Management, 2004. Proceedings. 16th International Conference on (pp. 423-424). IEEE.
  2. Amanowicz, C. and Gajewski, C. P., 1996, October. Military communications and information systems interoperability. In Military Communications Conference, 1996. MILCOM'96, Conference Proceedings, IEEE (Vol. 1, pp. 280-283). IEEE.
  3. Ameri, F. and Dutta, D., 2005. Product lifecycle management: closing the knowledge loops. ComputerAided Design and Applications, 2(5), pp.577-590.
  4. Andrienko, G., Andrienko, N., Demsar, U., Dransch, D., Dykes, J., Fabrikant, S.I., Jern, M., Kraak, M. J., Schumann, H. and Tominski, C., 2010. Space, time and visual analytics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(10), pp.1577- 1600.
  5. Asplund, F. and Törngren, M., 2015. The discourse on tool integration beyond technology, a literature survey. Journal of Systems and Software, 106, pp.117-131.
  6. Biehl, M., 2013. A modeling language for the description and development of tool chains for embedded systems.
  7. Bohner, S. A., 1996. Software change impact analysis.
  8. Bostock, M., 2012. D3. js. Data Driven Documents.
  9. Callahan, S. P., Freire, J., Santos, E., Scheidegger, C. E., Silva, C. T. and Vo, H. T., 2006. Managing the evolution of dataflows with vistrails. In Data Engineering Workshops, 2006. Proceedings. 22nd International Conference on (pp. 71-71). IEEE.
  10. Clark, T. and Jones, R., 1999, June. Organisational interoperability maturity model for C2. In Proceedings of the 1999 Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium.
  11. de Souza, C. R., Quirk, S., Trainer, E. and Redmiles, D. F., 2007, November. Supporting collaborative software development through the visualization of socio-technical dependencies. In Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Supporting group work (pp. 147-156). ACM.
  12. Diehl, S., 2007. Software visualization: visualizing the structure, behaviour, and evolution of software. Springer Science & Business Media.
  13. Fekete, J. D., 2004, October. The infovis toolkit. In Information Visualization, 2004. INFOVIS 2004. IEEE Symposium on (pp. 167-174). IEEE.
  14. Ford, T., Colombi, J., Graham, S. and Jacques, D., 2007. The interoperability score. AIR FORCE INST OF TECH WRIGHT-PATTERSON AFB OH.
  15. Fortineau, V., Paviot, T. and Lamouri, S., 2013. Improving the interoperability of industrial information systems with description logic-based models-The state of the art. Computers in Industry, 64(4), pp.363-375.
  16. Geraci, A., Katki, F., McMonegal, L., Meyer, B., Lane, J., Wilson, P., Radatz, J., Yee, M., Porteous, H. and Springsteel, F., 1991. IEEE standard computer dictionary: Compilation of IEEE standard computer glossaries. IEEE Press.
  17. Gershon, N. D., 1992. From perception to visualization. Computer graphics, 26(2), pp.414-415.
  18. Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P. and Yatskevich, M., 2004, February. S-Match: an algorithm and an implementation of semantic matching. In ESWS (Vol. 3053, pp. 61-75).
  19. Goldstein, H. H. and Neumann, J. V., 1963. Planning and Coding Problems for an Electronic Computer Instrument. Collected Works of J. von Neumann, 5, pp.80-235.
  20. Haibt, L. M., 1959, March. A program to draw multilevel flow charts. In Papers presented at the the March 3-5, 1959, western joint computer conference (pp. 131- 137). ACM.
  21. Hamilton Jr, J. A., Rosen, J. D. and Summers, P. A., 2002. An interoperability road map for C4ISR legacy systems. Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego CA.
  22. Keim, D., Andrienko, G., Fekete, J. D., Görg, C., Kohlhammer, J. and Melançon, G., 2008. Visual analytics: Definition, process, and challenges (pp. 154-175). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  23. Keim, D. A., Mansmann, F., Schneidewind, J., Thomas, J. and Ziegler, H., 2008. Visual analytics: Scope and challenges (pp. 76-90). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  24. Kopetz, H., 2013. System-of-Systems complexity. arXiv preprint arXiv:1311.3629.
  25. Lavean, G. E., 1980. Interoperability in defense communications. Communications, IEEE Transactions on, 28(9), pp.1445-1455.
  26. Ma, K. L., 2008, March. Stargate: A unified, interactive visualization of software projects. In Visualization Symposium, 2008. PacificVIS'08. IEEE Pacific (pp. 191-198). IEEE.
  27. Mensh, D., Kite, R. and Darby, P., 1989. A methodology for quantifying interoperability. Nav. Eng. J, 101(3), p.251.
  28. Paviot, T., Cheutet, V. and Lamouri, S., 2011. A PLCS framework for PDM/ERP interoperabilty. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management, 5(2-4), pp.295-313.
  29. Price, B., Small, I.S. and Baecker, R.M., 1992, January. A taxonomy of software visualization. In System Sciences, 1992. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 597- 606). IEEE.
  30. Ramamoorthy, C. V. and Wah, B. W., 1989. Knowledge and data engineering. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 1(1), pp.9-16.
  31. Romito, C., Probert, D. and Farrukh, C., 2007, August. Technology evaluation under information inadequacy. In Management of Engineering and Technology, Portland International Center for (pp. 1672-1679). IEEE.
  32. Schmidt, D. C., 2006. Guest editor's introduction: Modeldriven engineering. Computer, 39(2), pp.0025-31.
  33. Schroeder, W. J., Lorensen, B. and Martin, K., 2004. The visualization toolkit. Kitware.
  34. Schürr, A. and Dörr, H., 2005. Introductory paper. Software and Systems Modeling, 4(2), pp.109-111.
  35. Spalazzese, R., 2009, August. Towards mediator connectors for application level interoperability. In Proceedings of the doctoral symposium for ESEC/FSE on Doctoral symposium (pp. 35-36). ACM.
  36. Storey, M. A. D., Cubranic, D. and German, D. M., 2005, May. On the use of visualization to support awareness of human activities in software development: a survey and a framework. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on Software visualization (pp. 193-202). ACM.
  37. Upson, C., Faulhaber Jr, T., Kamins, D., Laidlaw, D., Schlegel, D., Vroom, J., Gurwitz, R. and Van Dam, A., 1989. The application visualization system: A computational environment for scientific visualization. Computer Graphics and Applications, IEEE, 9(4), pp.30-42.
  38. Voinea, L., Telea, A. and Van Wijk, J. J., 2005, May. CVSscan: visualization of code evolution. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on Software visualization (pp. 47-56). ACM.
  39. Voinea, S. L. and Telea, A., 2006, May. Cvsgrab: Mining the history of large software projects. In Proceedings of the Eighth Joint Eurographics/IEEE VGTC conference on Visualization (pp. 187-194). Eurographics Association.
  40. Wasserman, A. I., 1990, January. Tool integration in software engineering environments. In Software Engineering Environments (pp. 137-149). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  41. Wong, P. C. and Thomas, J., 2004. Visual analytics. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, (5), pp.20-21.
  42. Yan, L., Li, Z., Yuan, X. and Xiong, S., 2010. Method of Robust Multidisciplinary Design Collaborative Decision. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 3.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Gürdür D., Asplund F., El-khoury J., Loiret F. and Törngren M. (2016). Visual Analytics Towards Tool Interoperabilty - A Position Paper . In Proceedings of the 11th Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications - Volume 2: IVAPP, (VISIGRAPP 2016) ISBN 978-989-758-175-5, pages 139-145. DOI: 10.5220/0005751401390145

in Bibtex Style

author={Didem Gürdür and Fredrik Asplund and Jad El-khoury and Frederic Loiret and Martin Törngren},
title={Visual Analytics Towards Tool Interoperabilty - A Position Paper},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 11th Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications - Volume 2: IVAPP, (VISIGRAPP 2016)},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the 11th Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications - Volume 2: IVAPP, (VISIGRAPP 2016)
TI - Visual Analytics Towards Tool Interoperabilty - A Position Paper
SN - 978-989-758-175-5
AU - Gürdür D.
AU - Asplund F.
AU - El-khoury J.
AU - Loiret F.
AU - Törngren M.
PY - 2016
SP - 139
EP - 145
DO - 10.5220/0005751401390145