STUDENTS' PERCEPTIONS ACCORDING TO ACTIVE METHODOLOGIES IN THE CONTEX OF THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA

Angel F. Villarejo-Ramos, Fernando Criado-García-Legaz, Manuel J. Sanchez-Franco

Abstract

The learning methodologies (i.e., participative), the perceived institutional support and the learning performance linked to the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) are considered as the background to student satisfaction and the development of generic and specific skills for professional results after graduating. In particular, the main objective of this paper is to research about students` perceptions according to participative learning methodologies, the use of ICT and the institutional support in the University context. This study, firstly, provides an analysis of the expectations of current undergraduate students in the business and management area. Secondly, it analyzes a causal model related to the use of participative teaching methodologies, perceived institutional support, and the use of ICT in the teachinglearning process, as determinants of student satisfaction and skills development in the context of the European Higher Education Area (EHEA). Previous analysis about expectations and the theoretical model and the hypotheses discussed above are validated through a non-probabilistic sampling and self-selection. The data are particularly collected from a sample of questionnaires filled out by second course undergraduate students (University of Seville, Spain).

References

  1. Álvarez, E. and Pérez, R., 2004. Dimensión estructural y funcional de la comunidad educativa en una perspectiva de cambio: sistemas de relaciones y cultura de cambio. In VII Congreso Internacional de Organización de Instituciones Educativas (pp. 344- 358). Sevilla: CIOIE.
  2. Álvarez, V. and Romero, S., 2007. Formación basada en competencias para los profesionales de la orientación. Educación XX1, 10, 15-37.
  3. Anderson, T., 2004. Teaching in an Online Learning Context. In T. Anderson y F. Elloumi (Ed.), Theory and Practice of Online Learning (pp. 273-294). Athabasca: Athabasca University.
  4. Añel, M. E., 2008. Formación on-line en la universidad. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 33, 155- 163.
  5. Appleton-Knapp, S.L. and Krentler, K.A. (2006). Measuring Student Expectations and Their Effects on Satisfaction: The Importance of Managing Student Expectations. Journal of Marketing Education, 28, 254-264.
  6. Área, M., 2000. ¿Qué aporta Internet al cambio pedagógico en la Educación Superior? En R. Pérez (Ed.), III Congreso Internacional de Comunicación, Tecnología y Educación: Redes, Multimedia y Diseños virtuales (pp.128-135), Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo. Oviedo.
  7. Bagozzi, R.P. and Yi, Y., 1988. On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
  8. Barclay, D., Higgins, C. and Thompson, R., 1995. The partial least Squares (PLS) approach to causal modelling: personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technology Studies, Special Issue on Research Methodology, 2 (2), 285-309.
  9. Barr, H., Ivan, K., Reeves, S., Hammick, M. and Freeth, D., 2005. Effective Interprofessional Education: Argument, Assumption & Evidence, Blackwell Publishing. UK.
  10. Bonk, C., 2003. I should have known this was coming: computer-mediated discussions in teacher education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(2), 95-102.
  11. Cabero, J. (dir.), Castaño, C., Cebreiro, B., Gisbert, M., Martínez, F., Morales, J.A., Prendes, M.P., Romero, R. and Salinas, J., 2003. Las nuevas tecnologías en la actividad universitaria. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 33, 81-100.
  12. Cabero, J., 2000. La formación virtual: Principios, bases y preocupaciones. In R. Pérez (Ed.), III Congreso Internacional de Comunicación, Tecnología y Educación. Redes, multimedia y diseños virtuales (pp.83-102). Oviedo: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.
  13. Carmines, E.G. and Zeller, R.A., 1979. Reliability and Validity Assessment, Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks, CA.
  14. Castells, M., 2000a. La era de la información. La sociedad red, Vol. 1, Alianza. Madrid.
  15. Castells, M., 2000b. La era de la información. El poder de la identidad, Vol. 2, Alianza. Madrid.
  16. Correa, J.M. and Paredes, J., 2009. Cambio tecnológico, usos de plataformas de e-learning y transformación de la enseñanza en las universidades españolas: La perspectiva de los profesores. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 14(2), 261-278.
  17. Cronbach, L. J., 1970. Essentials of psychological testing. New York: Harper & Row.
  18. Curran, V. R., Sharpe, D., Forristall, J. and Flynn, K., 2008. Student satisfaction and perceptions of small group process in case-based inter-professional learning. Medical Teacher, 30, 431-433.
  19. De Miguel, M., 2005a. Adaptación de los planes de estudio al proceso de convergencia europea, Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo. Oviedo.
  20. De Miguel, M., (Coord.), 2005b. Modalidades de Enseñanza centradas en el desarrollo de Competencias: orientaciones para promover el cambio metodológico en el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior. Proyecto EA2005-0118.
  21. De Miguel, M. (Coord.), 2009. Metodologías de enseñanza y aprendizaje para el desarrollo de competencias: orientaciones para el profesorado universitario ante el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior, Alianza. Madrid.
  22. Fernández, A., 2006. Metodologías activas para la formación de competencias. Educación XX1, 24, 35- 56.
  23. Fernández, B., Suárez, L. and Villarejo, A.F., 2008. Determinantes del aprendizaje del alumno ante el reto de la convergencia europea. In J. Pindado y G. Payne, (Coord.), Estableciendo puentes en una economía global, (Building Bridges in a Global Economy), ESIC. Madrid.
  24. Fernández, M.C. and Cebreiro, B., 2003. Evaluación de la enseñanza con TIC. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 21.
  25. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
  26. Fredericksen, E., Shea P. and Pickett, A., 2000. Factors influencing student and faculty satisfaction in the SUNY learning network, State University of New York. New York.
  27. GIDEPA, 2005. Retos del docente universitario en el contexto de una enseñanza virtual, en Hacia dónde va la educación universitaria americana y europea, León (España), 20-23 septiembre. Inédito.
  28. Gromaz, M., Rodríguez, M. J. and García, J., 2008. Experiencias exitosas de e-learning en la universidad gallega. Pixel-Bit. Revista de Medios y Educación, 33, 173-182.
  29. Mahdizadeh, H., Biemans, H. and Mulder, M., 2008. Determining factors of the use of e-learning environments by university teachers. Computers and Education, 51(1), 142-154.
  30. Mavondo, F.T., Tsarenko, Y. and Gabbott, M., 2004. International and Local Student Satisfaction: Resources and Capabilities Perspective. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 14(1), 41-60.
  31. Monereo, C. and Pozo, J. I. (Ed.), 2003. La universidad ante la nueva cultura educativa. Enseñar y aprender en la autonomía. Barcelona: Institut de Ciències de l'Educació de la UAB-Síntesis.
  32. Nunnally, J.C., 1978. Psychometric Theory, McGraw-Hill. New York.
  33. Oliver, K. M. and Corn, J. O., 2008. Student-reported differences in technology use and skills after the implementation of one-to-one computing, Educational Media International, 45(3), 215-229.
  34. Ringle, C.M.; Wende, S. and Will, A., 2008. SmartPLS 2.0 (Beta). University of Hamburg: Hamburg, Germany, available at: http://www.smartpls.de (accessed March 2010).
  35. Villarejo, A.F., Fernández, B., Suárez, L., Sánchez, M.J. and Álvarez, E., 2010. Participative methodologies and the use of ICT like determinant factors in the students' satisfaction and the development of competencies before the challenge of the European Higher Education Area. In GUIDE International Workshop 2010, Roma: Association Global Universities in Distance Education.
  36. Zabalza, M. A., 2002. La enseñanza universitaria. El escenario y sus protagonistas, Narcea. Madrid.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Villarejo-Ramos A., Sanchez-Franco M. and Criado-García-Legaz F. (2011). STUDENTS' PERCEPTIONS ACCORDING TO ACTIVE METHODOLOGIES IN THE CONTEX OF THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA . In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Innovative Developments in ICT - Volume 1: INNOV, ISBN 978-989-8425-67-6, pages 87-96. DOI: 10.5220/0004472200870096


in Bibtex Style

@conference{innov11,
author={Angel F. Villarejo-Ramos and Manuel J. Sanchez-Franco and Fernando Criado-García-Legaz},
title={STUDENTS' PERCEPTIONS ACCORDING TO ACTIVE METHODOLOGIES IN THE CONTEX OF THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Innovative Developments in ICT - Volume 1: INNOV,},
year={2011},
pages={87-96},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004472200870096},
isbn={978-989-8425-67-6},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Innovative Developments in ICT - Volume 1: INNOV,
TI - STUDENTS' PERCEPTIONS ACCORDING TO ACTIVE METHODOLOGIES IN THE CONTEX OF THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA
SN - 978-989-8425-67-6
AU - Villarejo-Ramos A.
AU - Sanchez-Franco M.
AU - Criado-García-Legaz F.
PY - 2011
SP - 87
EP - 96
DO - 10.5220/0004472200870096