IMPORTANCE OF INPUT PARAMETER SELECTION FOR SYNTHETIC STREAMFLOW GENERATION OF DIFFERENT TIME STEP USING ANN TECHNIQUES

Maya Rajnarayn Ray, Arup Kumar Sarma

Abstract

Streamflow time series is gaining importance in planning, management and operation of water resources system day by day. In order to plan a system in an optimal way, especially when sufficient historical data are not available, the only choice left is to generate synthetic streamflow. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) has been successfully used in the past for streamflow forecasting and monthly synthetic streamflow generation. The capability of ANN to generate synthetic series of river discharge averaged over different time steps with limited data has been investigated in the present study. While an ANN model with certain input parameters can generate a monthly averaged streamflow series efficiently, it fails to generate a series of smaller time steps with the same accuracy. The scope of improving efficiency of ANN in generating synthetic streamflow by using different combinations of input data has been analyzed. The developed models have been assessed through their application in the river Subansiri in India. Efficiency of the ANN models has been evaluated by comparing ANN generated series with the historical series and the series generated by Thomas-Fiering model on the basis of three statistical parameters- periodical mean, periodical standard deviation and skewness of the series. The results reveal that the periodical mean of the series generated by both Thomas –Fiering and ANN models is in good agreement with that of the historical series. However, periodical standard deviation and skewness coefficient of the series generated by Thomas–Fiering model are inferior to that of the series generated by ANN.

References

  1. Ahmed J A, Sarma A K 2007. Artificial neural network model for synthetic streamflow generation. Water Resources Management 21(6):1015-1029
  2. Govindaraju R S 2000. Artificial neural networks in Hydrology. II: Hydrologic applications. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 5(2): 124-137
  3. Bayazit M 1988. Hidrolojik Modeller, I.T.U. rektorlugu, Istanbul.
  4. Birikundavyi S, Labib R, Trung H, Rousselle J 2002. Performance of Neural Networks in Daily Streamflow Forecasting. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 7 (5): 392- 398
  5. Box, G E P, Jenkins, G M 1976. Time Series Analysis Forecasting and Control. San Francisco: Holden-Day
  6. Burian J S, Durrans S R, Nix, S J, Pitt, R E 2001.Training artificial neural networks to perform rainfall disaggregation. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering ASCE 6(1): 43-51
  7. Chandramouli V, Raman H 2001. Multireservoir modeling with dynamic programming and neural networks. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 127(2): 89-98
  8. Chandramouli V, Deka P 2005. Neural Network Based Decision Support Model for Optimal Reservoir Operation. Water Ressources Management, 19: 447- 464
  9. Diamantopoulou J M, Antonopoulos V Z, Papamichail D M 2007. Cascade correlation artificial neural networks for estimating missing monthly values of water quality parameters in rivers. Water Resources Management 21:649-662
  10. Govindaraju R S, Rao A R 2000. Artificial neural networks in hydrology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
  11. Hagan M T, Demuth H B, Beale M 1996. Neural network design. PWS/KENT Publishing Co., Boston
  12. Karunanithi N, Grenney W J, Whitley D, Bovee K 1994. Neural networks for river flow prediction. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering ASCE 8 (2):201-220
  13. Kumar D, Raju K, Sathish T 2004. River Flow Forecasting Using Recurrent Neural Networks. Water Resources Management, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 18: 143- 161
  14. Loucks D P, Stedinger J R, Haith D A 1981. Water resources system planning and analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey
  15. Maass A, Hufschmidt, M M., Dorfman J R, Thomas H A, Marglin SA, Fair GM 1970. Design of water resources systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
  16. Ochoa-Rivera J C, Andreu J, García-Bartual R 2007. Influence of Inflows Modeling on Management Simulation of Water Resources System. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 2:106- 116
  17. Raman H, Sunilkumar N (1995) Multivariate modeling of water resources time series using artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrological Sciences 40(2):145-163
  18. Rumelhart D E, Hinton G E, Williams R J 1986. Learning internal representations by error propagation, Parallel distributed processing, Rumelhart DE and McCleland JL (eds.) vol. 1, Chapter 8, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  19. Srinivasulu S, Jain A 2006. A comparative analysis of training methods for artificial neural network rainfallrunoff models. Applied Soft Computing 6: 295-306
  20. Stedinger J R, Taylor, M R 1982. Synthetic streamflow generation 1: Model verification and validation. Water Resources Research 18(4): 909-918
  21. Thomas H A, Fiering M B 1962. Mathematical synthesis of streamflow sequences for the analysis of river basins by simulation. In: Design of Water Resources Systems, (Ed. by A. Maas et al.) Chapter 12 Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass
  22. Treiber B, Schultz G A 3/1976. Comparison of required reservoir storages computed by the Thomas-Fiering model and the 'Karlsruhe model' Type A and B. Hydrological Sciences-Bulletin-des Sciences Hydrologiques- XXI 1(3) 177-185
  23. Yurekli K, Kurunc A. 2004. Performances of Stochastic Approaches in Generating Low Streamflow Data for Drought Analysis. Journal of Spatial Hydrology 5(1): 20-32
  24. Zekai Z (6/1978) A mathematical model of monthly flow sequences. Hydrological Sciences-Bulletin-des Sciences Hydrologiques 23(2): 223-229
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Rajnarayn Ray M. and Kumar Sarma A. (2011). IMPORTANCE OF INPUT PARAMETER SELECTION FOR SYNTHETIC STREAMFLOW GENERATION OF DIFFERENT TIME STEP USING ANN TECHNIQUES . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Computation Theory and Applications - Volume 1: NCTA, (IJCCI 2011) ISBN 978-989-8425-84-3, pages 211-217. DOI: 10.5220/0003681802110217


in Bibtex Style

@conference{ncta11,
author={Maya Rajnarayn Ray and Arup Kumar Sarma},
title={IMPORTANCE OF INPUT PARAMETER SELECTION FOR SYNTHETIC STREAMFLOW GENERATION OF DIFFERENT TIME STEP USING ANN TECHNIQUES},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Computation Theory and Applications - Volume 1: NCTA, (IJCCI 2011)},
year={2011},
pages={211-217},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003681802110217},
isbn={978-989-8425-84-3},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Computation Theory and Applications - Volume 1: NCTA, (IJCCI 2011)
TI - IMPORTANCE OF INPUT PARAMETER SELECTION FOR SYNTHETIC STREAMFLOW GENERATION OF DIFFERENT TIME STEP USING ANN TECHNIQUES
SN - 978-989-8425-84-3
AU - Rajnarayn Ray M.
AU - Kumar Sarma A.
PY - 2011
SP - 211
EP - 217
DO - 10.5220/0003681802110217