MODELING WORK PROCESSES AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT - Notation and Tool

Andre L. N Campos, Toacy C. Oliveira

Abstract

Process modeling are becoming more essential to the activities of acquisition and development of systems. There are a number of possible notations and tools for process modeling, and sometimes it isn’t an easy choice. This papers try, through research in a real environment, identify selection criteria and recommend the most appropriate notations and tools for process modeling.

References

  1. Abdala, M., Lahoz, C., & Sant'Anna, N. (2003). Utilizando o SPEM para a modelagem dos processos da qualidade e do gerenciamento da configuração em um ambiente integrado. V Simpósio Internacial de Melhora de Processo de Software .
  2. Agular-Savén, R. S. (2003). Business process modelling: review and framework. International Journal of Production Economics .
  3. Alexandre, J. W. (2003). Análise do número de categorias da escala Likert aplicada a gestão pela qualidade total através da teoria da resposta ao item. Encontro Nacional de Engehnaria de PRodução .
  4. Araujo, R., Cappelli, C., Gomes Jr, A., Pereira, M., Iendrike, H. d., Ielpo, D., et al. (2004). A definição de processos de software sob o ponto de vista da gestão de processos de negócio. IV Simpósio Internacional de Melhoria de Processos de Software .
  5. Bargis, J. (2008). The importance of business process modeling in software system design. Sicence of Computer Programming .
  6. Benedictis, C., Amaral, D. C., & Rozendfeld, H. (2003). Avaliação dos principais métodos e ferramentas disponíveis para a modelagem do processo de desenvolvimento de produto. IV Congresso Brasileiro de Gestão de Desenvolvimento de Produtos .
  7. Gartner Group. (2008). Magic Quadrant for Business Process Analysis Tools.
  8. Gonzales-Perez, C., & Henderson-Sellers, B. (2007). Modelling software development methodologies: a conceptual foundation. The journal of Systems and Software .
  9. Green, P., & Rosemann, M. (2000). Integrated process modeling: an ontological evaluation. Information Systems , 25 (2).
  10. IEEE. (1998). Standard for Functional Modeling Language Syntax and Semantics for IDEF0 . IEEE Explore .
  11. Macedo, R. d., & Schmitz, E. A. (2001). Ferramentas de modelagem de processo: uma avaliação. XXXIII Simpósio Brasileiro de Pesquisa Operacional (SBPO).
  12. Norton, D., Blechar, M., & Jones, T. (2010). Magic quadrant for business process analysis tools. Gartner RAS Core Research.
  13. OMG. (2010). Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN).
  14. Ortiz-Hernández, J., Nieto-Ariza, M. E., Estrada-Esquivel, H., Rodrígues-Ortiz, G., & Montes-Rendon, A. (2007). SOQUA'07. Dubrovnik, Coratia.
  15. Recker, C. J. (2010). Opportuniites and constraints: the current struggle witdh BPMN. Business Process Management Journal , pp. 181-201.
  16. Santos Jr, P. S., Almeida, J. P., & Guizzardi, G. (2010). An ontology-based semantic foundation for ARIS EPCs. ACM Symposium on applied computing .
  17. Santos Jr, P. S., Almeida, J. P., & Pianissolla, T. L. (2008). Construção de um metamodelo para ARIS Method: escavação, refatoração e análise. Third Workshop on ontologies and metamodeling in software and data engeneering .
  18. Scheer, A.-W. (2003). ARIS Toolset: A Software product is born. ScienceDirect .
  19. Soung-Hie, K., & Ki-Jin, J. (2000). Desiging performance analysis and IDEF0 for enterprise modelling BPR. Elsevier International Journalof Production Economics .
  20. Soung-Hie, K., & Ki-Jin, J. (2002). Designing performance analysis and IDEF0 for enterprise modelling in BPR. International journal of production economics .
  21. Souza, J., Andrade, T., Pereira, M., Lopes, M., Siqueira, S., Baião, F., et al. (2009). Integração semântica de modelos. Rio de Janeiro: Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.
  22. White, S. (2004). Introduction do BPMN. BPTrends .
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

L. N Campos A. and C. Oliveira T. (2011). MODELING WORK PROCESSES AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT - Notation and Tool . In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 978-989-8425-55-3, pages 337-343. DOI: 10.5220/0003581403370343


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis11,
author={Andre L. N Campos and Toacy C. Oliveira},
title={MODELING WORK PROCESSES AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT - Notation and Tool},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2011},
pages={337-343},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003581403370343},
isbn={978-989-8425-55-3},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - MODELING WORK PROCESSES AND SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT - Notation and Tool
SN - 978-989-8425-55-3
AU - L. N Campos A.
AU - C. Oliveira T.
PY - 2011
SP - 337
EP - 343
DO - 10.5220/0003581403370343