Helder Gomes, André Zúquete, Gonçalo Paiva Dias


The online provision of public services to citizens, e-government, is here to stay. Its advantages are huge, both for the government and for the citizens. Life-event service is a sound concept in which services are designed to cater with citizen real needs instead of government departments needs. But this type of services requires interoperability between government departments. Among other things, interoperability implies the exchange of information between government departments which traditionally has been implemented by direct communication. This direct communication raises privacy concerns on citizens since their personal information is potentially exchanged without their knowledge and control. In this paper we propose an e-government model where the citizen controls the exchange of his personal information between government departments.


  1. Al-Fedaghi, S. S. & Taha, M. M., 2006. Personal Informnation eWallet. In 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 2855-2862.
  2. Bannister, F., 2005. The Panoptic State: Privacy, Surveillance and the Balance of Risk. Information Polity, 10(1/2), pp.65-78.
  3. Brooks, L. & Agyekum-Ofosu, C., 2010. The Role of Trust in E-Government Adoption in the UK. In Proceedings of the Transforming Government Workshop 2010 (tGov2010).
  4. Burton, C., 2009. The Information Card Ecosystem: The Fundamental Leap from Cookies & Passwords to Cards & Selectors. Information Card Foundation.
  5. Dias, G. & Rafael, J., 2007. A simple model and a distributed architecture for realizing one-stop egovernment. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 6(1), pp.81-90.
  6. Dutton, W. et al., 2005. The Cyber Trust Tension in Egovernment: Balancing Identity, Privacy, Security. Information Polity, 10(1/2), pp.13-23.
  7. European Commission, 2003. The Role of eGovernment for Europe's Future.
  8. Eynon, R., 2007. Breaking Barriers to eGovernment: Solutions for eGovernment, Deliverable 3. eGovernment Unit, DG Information Society and Media, European Commission, (29172).
  9. Filho, A. R., 2005. e-Citizen: Why Waiting for the Governments? Ifip International Federation For Information Processing, pp.91-99.
  10. Heeks, R., 2003. Most e-government-for-development projects fail: how can risks be reduced? In iGovernment Working Paper Series. University of Manchester.
  11. Klischewski, R., 2004. Information integration or process integration? How to achieve interoperability in administration. In Electronic Government: Proceedings of Third International Conference, EGOV 2004. Zaragoza, Spain: Springer, pp. 57-65.
  12. Kubicek, H. & Cimander, R., 2009. Three dimensions of organizational interoperability: Insights from recent studies for improving interoperability frameworks. European Journal of ePractice, (January), pp.1-12.
  13. Kubicek, H. & Hagen, M., 2000. One-Stop-Government in Europe: An overview. In One-Stop Government in Europe: Results from 11 National Surveys. Bremen: University of Bremen, pp. 1-38.
  14. Lau, E., 2003. Challenges for E-Government Development. In 5th Global Forum on Reinventing Government. Mexico City, pp. 1-18.
  15. Layne, K. & Lee, J., 2001. Developing fully functional Egovernment: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18, pp.122-136.
  16. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2003. The e-Government Imperative: Main Findings,
  17. Tambouris, E. & Tarabanis, K., 2008. A dialogue-based , life-event oriented , active portal for online one-stop government: The OneStopGov platform. In The Proceedings of the 9th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference. pp. 405-406.
  18. United Nations & American Society for Public Administration, 2002. Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective, New York: U. N. Publications.
  19. Vintar, M., Kunstelj, M. & Leben, A., 2002. Delivery Better Quality Public Services Through Life-Event Portals. In 10th NISPAcce Annual Conference. Cracow, Poland.
  20. Yildiz, M., 2007. E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), pp.646-665.

Paper Citation

in Harvard Style

Gomes H., Zúquete A. and Paiva Dias G. (2011). CITIZEN CONTROLLED EXCHANGE OF INFORMATION IN E-GOVERNMENT . In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST, ISBN 978-989-8425-51-5, pages 494-499. DOI: 10.5220/0003402804940499

in Bibtex Style

author={Helder Gomes and André Zúquete and Gonçalo Paiva Dias},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST,},

in EndNote Style

JO - Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 1: WEBIST,
SN - 978-989-8425-51-5
AU - Gomes H.
AU - Zúquete A.
AU - Paiva Dias G.
PY - 2011
SP - 494
EP - 499
DO - 10.5220/0003402804940499