Relevance and Usage of Semantic Technologies in the Factory of Things

Matthias Loskyll

Abstract

The Factory of Things (FoT) describes the extension of the Internet of Things specific to the production domain. The semantic description of products, processes and plants depicts a basic module of this approach, through which information can be filtered and services can be discovered and orchestrated on demand. The usage of semantic technologies in the context of production can make a valuable contribution towards managing the growing complexity and increasing the flexibility and adaptability of production facilities. This position paper discusses several use cases, which explain the potential advantages of using semantic technologies in the field of production automation. These scenarios cover the interpretation of heterogeneous context data using ontologies, the semantic description of facilities including the respective components (e.g. sensors), and the orchestration of semantically annotated web services to build complex production processes. Based on the described use cases, several scientific issues are discussed with a special focus on semantic interoperability.

References

  1. Z ├╝hlke, D.: SmartFactory - Towards a factory-of-things. Annual Reviews in Control, Vol. 34, Issue 1, 129-138, ISSN 1367-5788 (2010)
  2. Berners-Lee, T., Fischetti, M.: Weaving the Web: The Past, Present and Future of the World Wide Web by its Inventor. Britain: Orion Business (1999)
  3. Garshol, L.M.: Metadata? thesauri? taxonomies? topic maps! making sense of it all. Journal of Information Science, Vol. 30, No. 4, 378-391 (2004)
  4. Gruber, T. An Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, Vol. 5, No. 2: 199-220 (1993)
  5. Smith, M. K., Welty, C., McGuinness, D. L.: OWL Web Ontology Language Guide (2004)
  6. Manola F. and Miller, E.: RDF Primer. W3C Recommendation (2004)
  7. Christensen, E., Curbera, F., Meredith, G., Weerawarana, S.: Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1 (2001)
  8. Alves, A., Arkin, A., Askary, S., Bloch, B., et al.: Web Service Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0. OASIS (2006)
  9. Farrell, J., Lausen, H.: Semantic annotations for WSDL and XML schema. Technical report, W3C (2007)
  10. Martin, D. et al.: Bringing semantics to web services with owl-s. World Wide Web 10, 243- 277 (2007)
  11. Diep D., Alexakos C., Wagner T.: An Ontology-based Interoperability Framework for Distributed Manufacturing Control. 12th IEEE Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA 07). IEEE Automation and Control System, Engineering manufacturing (2007)
  12. Obitko, M. and Marik, V.: Ontologies for Multi-Agent Systems in Manufacturing Domain. 13th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 7802). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 597-602 (2002)
  13. M. Viinikkala, S. Syrjl, S. Kuikka: A Maintenance Demand Analyzer - a Web Service based on a Semantic Plant Model. 4th International IEEE Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN 2006), Singapore, 16-18 (2006)
  14. Jin, G., Xiang, Z., Lv, F.: Semantic integrated condition monitoring and maintenance of complex system. 16th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 670-674 (2009)
  15. Lohse N., Hirani H., Ratchev S.: Equipment ontology for modular reconfigurable assembly systems. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems. Vol. 17, No. 4, 301-314 (2005)
  16. Lastra, M. und Delamer, I. M.: Ontologies for Production Automation. Advances in Web Semantics I: Ontologies, Web Services and Applied Semantic Web. 276-289 (2009)
  17. Lastra, M. und Delamer, I. M.: Semantic web services in factory automation: fundamental insights and research roadmap. IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., Vol. 2, No. 1, 1-11 (2006)
  18. Cndido, G., Jammes, F., Barata, J., Colombo, A.: Semantic SOA approach to support agile reengineering at device level. Proceedings of the 10th IFAC Workshop on Intelligent Manufacturing Systems (IMS-2010), Lisbon, Portugal (2010)
  19. Horridge, M., Bechhofer, S.: The OWL API: A Java API for Working with OWL 2 Ontologies. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 529 (2008)
  20. Stephan, P., Meixner, G., Koessling, H., Floerchinger, F. and Ollinger, L. : Product-Mediated Communication through Digital Object Memories in Heterogeneous Value Chains. IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom). 199-207 (2010)
  21. Z ├╝hlke, D. SmartFactory: From Vision to Reality in Factory Technologies. Proc. of the 17th International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC) World Congress, 82-89 (2008).
  22. Mahnke, W., Leitner, S. H., Damm, M.: OPC Unified Architecture. Springer Verlag (2009)
  23. Cullen, J. and Bryman, A.: The knowledge acquisition bottleneck: Time for reassessment? Expert Systems, Vol. 5, No. 3, 216-225 (1988)
  24. Li, Z., Yang, M. C. , Ramani, K.: A methodology for engineering ontology acquisition and validation. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing Vol. 23, No. 1 (2009)
  25. Welbank, M.: An overview of knowledge acquisition methods. Interacting with Computers, Vol. 2, Issue 1, 83-91 (1990)
  26. Mozina, M., Guid, M., Krivec, J., Sadikov, A., and Bratko, I.: Fighting Knowledge Acquisition Bottleneck with Argument Based Machine Learning. Proceeding of the 2008 Conference on ECAI 2008: 18th European Conference on Artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Vol. 178. IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 234-238 (2008)
  27. Kalfoglou, Y. and Schorlemmer, M.: Ontology Mapping: The State of the Art. The Knowledge Engineering Review, Vol. 18, 1-31 (2003)
  28. Fellbaum, C.: A Semantic Network of English: The Mother of All WordNets. Computers and the Humanities, Vol. 32 , Nr. 2 , 209-220 (1998)
  29. Russell, N., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Mulyar, N.: Workflow ControlFlow Patterns: A Revised View. BPM Center Report BPM-06-22 (2006)
  30. Costa, P. C. G. and Laskey, K.B.: PR-OWL: A Framework for Probabilistic Ontologies. 2006 conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference (FOIS 2006), IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 237-249 (2006)
  31. Ding, Z. and Peng, Y.: A Probabilistic Extension to Ontology Language OWL. 37th Hawaii International Conference On System Sciences (HICSS-37) (2004)
  32. Gao, M. and Liu, C.: Extending OWL by Fuzzy Description Logic. 17th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI 7805). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 562-567 (2005)
  33. Ding, Z., Peng, Y., Pan, R.: BayesOWL: Uncertainty modeling in Semantic Web ontologies. Soft Computing in Ontologies and Semantic Web, Vol. 204 of Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, Springer (2005)
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Loskyll M. (2011). Relevance and Usage of Semantic Technologies in the Factory of Things . In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Interoperability - Volume 1: IWSI, (ICAART 2011) ISBN 978-989-8425-43-0, pages 64-72. DOI: 10.5220/0003352200640072


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iwsi11,
author={Matthias Loskyll},
title={Relevance and Usage of Semantic Technologies in the Factory of Things},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Interoperability - Volume 1: IWSI, (ICAART 2011)},
year={2011},
pages={64-72},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003352200640072},
isbn={978-989-8425-43-0},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Interoperability - Volume 1: IWSI, (ICAART 2011)
TI - Relevance and Usage of Semantic Technologies in the Factory of Things
SN - 978-989-8425-43-0
AU - Loskyll M.
PY - 2011
SP - 64
EP - 72
DO - 10.5220/0003352200640072