INTEREST-BASED PREFERENCE REASONING

Wietske Visser, Koen V. Hindriks, Catholijn M. Jonker

Abstract

In the context of practical reasoning, such as decision making and negotiation, it is necessary to model preferences over possible outcomes. Such preferences usually depend on multiple criteria. We argue that the criteria by which outcomes are evaluated should be the satisfaction of a person’s underlying interests: the more an outcome satisfies his interests, the more preferred it is. Underlying interests can explain and eliminate conditional preferences. Also, modelling interests will create a better model of human preferences, and can lead to better, more creative deals in negotiation. We present an argumentation framework for reasoning about interest-based preferences. We take a qualitative approach and provide the means to derive both ceteris paribus and lexicographic preferences.

References

  1. Amgoud, L., Bonnefon, J.-F., and Prade, H. (2005). An argumentation-based approach to multiple criteria decision. In Proc. ECSQARU, p. 269-280.
  2. Amgoud, L. and Prade, H. (2009). Using arguments for making and explaining decisions. Artif. Intell., 173(3- 4):413-436.
  3. Bench-Capon, T. and Atkinson, K. (2009). Abstract argumentation and values. In Rahwan, I. and Simari, G. R., editors, Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, p. 45-64. Springer.
  4. Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2003). Persuasion in practical argument using value based argumentation frameworks. J. Logic Comput., 13(3):429-448.
  5. Boutilier, C., Brafman, R. I., Domshlak, C., Hoos, H. H., and Poole, D. (2004). CP-nets: A tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus preference statements. J. Artif. Intell. Res., 21:135-191.
  6. Brewka, G. (2004). A rank based description language for qualitative preferences. In Proc. ECAI, p. 303-307.
  7. Dung, P. M. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artif. Intell., 77:321-357.
  8. Kaci, S. and van der Torre, L. (2008). Preference-based argumentation: Arguments supporting multiple values. Int. J. of Approx. Reason., 48(3):730-751.
  9. Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking. Harvard University Press.
  10. Keeney, R. L. and Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value trade-offs. Cambridge University Press.
  11. Ouerdane, W., Maudet, N., and Tsoukiàs, A. (2008). Argument schemes and critical questions for decision aiding process. Proc. COMMA, p. 285-296.
  12. Ouerdane, W., Maudet, N., and Tsoukiàs, A. (2010). Argumentation theory and decision aiding. In Ehrgott, M., Figueira, J. R., and Greco, S., editors, New Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Springer.
  13. Prakken, H. (2005). A study of accrual of arguments, with applications to evidential reasoning. In Proc. ICAIL, p. 85-94.
  14. Rahwan, I., Pasquier, P., Sonenberg, L., and Dignum, F. (2007). On the benefits of exploiting underlying goals in argument-based negotiation. In Proc. AAAI, p. 116- 121.
  15. Vreeswijk, G. A. W. (1997). Abstract argumentation systems. Artif. Intell., 90(1-2):225-279.
  16. van der Weide, T., Dignum, F., Meyer, J.-J., Prakken, H., and Vreeswijk, G. (2009). Practical reasoning using values: Giving meaning to values. In Proc. ArgMAS.
  17. Wellman, M. P. and Doyle, J. (1991). Preferential semantics for goals. In Proc. AAAI, p. 698-703.
  18. von Wright, G. H. (1963). The Logic of Preference: An Essay. Edinburgh University Press.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Visser W., V. Hindriks K. and M. Jonker C. (2011). INTEREST-BASED PREFERENCE REASONING . In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1: ICAART, ISBN 978-989-8425-40-9, pages 79-88. DOI: 10.5220/0003141300790088


in Bibtex Style

@conference{icaart11,
author={Wietske Visser and Koen V. Hindriks and Catholijn M. Jonker},
title={INTEREST-BASED PREFERENCE REASONING},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1: ICAART,},
year={2011},
pages={79-88},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003141300790088},
isbn={978-989-8425-40-9},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1: ICAART,
TI - INTEREST-BASED PREFERENCE REASONING
SN - 978-989-8425-40-9
AU - Visser W.
AU - V. Hindriks K.
AU - M. Jonker C.
PY - 2011
SP - 79
EP - 88
DO - 10.5220/0003141300790088