Public Perceptions on the Problems of Kuranji River Basin
Management in West Sumatera, Indonesia
Rudi Febriamansyah
1
and Finna Nurpasari
2
1
Faculty of Agriculture, Andalas University.Kampus Unand Limau Manis, Padang, Indonesia
2
Graduate Program, Andalas University, KampusUnand Limau Manis, Padang, Indonesia
Keywords: Public perceptions, River Basin Management, West Sumatera.
Abstract: Batang Kuranji is one of the main rivers that divide the city of Padang, West Sumatera, Indonesia from the
Bukit Barisan mountains in the east to the Indian Ocean in the west, with a length of about 25 km, and a
river basin area of 202.7 Km
2
. Over the last three decades, there has been an increase in the frequency of
problems caused by the declining quality of watershed management, such as upstream landslides, and
flooding downstream in urban areas. This study attempts to explore and identify the watershed management
issues, from upstream to downstream, based on community perspectives along the river basins: upstream,
middle and downstream. Qualitative and quantitative data collection methods were applied through surveys
with respondents, semi structured interviews with key informant and Focus Group Discussion with
stakeholders. In general, each community group along the river basin has a similar view of the more
frequent flooding problems and the higher of flood. However, the factors that cause the problems for each
community are different with each group blaming one another. This study explores these differing views
between groups and provides recommendations for policy makers towards integrated management.
1 INTRODUCTION
For over 20 years the world has acknowledged the
integrated nature of water resources management
and has worked together to form acceptable
agreements. First initiated at the United Nation
Water Conference (UNWC) in Mar de Plata,
Argentina 1977 and then formed on United Nation
Conference Environment (UNCED) and
Development in 1989 (Sheuman, 2001). One of the
key elements of integrated natural resource
management is the need to involve stakeholders in
the decision-making process. This means
coordinating policy at all levels from national
ministries to local government or community based
institution (GWP (Global Water Partnership), 2000).
Current management patterns should be
transformed towards adaptive management,
integrating all stakeholders and holistic in the sense
of incorporating elements that support the
sustainability of water resources, i.e. environment,
technology, economy, institutional, and cultural
characteristics. Important terms related to integrated
management are Integrated Water Resources
Management (IWRM), Integrated Water
Management (IWM) and River Basin Management
(RBM). Though there are some differences between
them, they all emphasize a process that is
coordinated and the relationship between
sustainability and economic and social welfare
(Stalnacke & Gooch, 2003). The development of the
concept is due to the issues of water resources that
trigger the tragedy of the commons due to the
diversity of interest in the use of water causing
scarcity of water resources, and causing conflicts in
various places. In addition, the problems and
challenges in water resources management practices
in Indonesia imply that the government is 'milking'
other parties (Sriyono, 2015). Several challenges
facing developing countries today include; cost and
benefits being distributed unevenly, conflicting uses,
the useof technology, uncertainty in watershed
management and implementing the participatory
approach (Kerr, 2007). Because water is limited,
participatory approach should be implemented
between users, planners and a policy maker at all
levels, the important role of women, and knowing
generally that water has economic value (GWP,
2004).
Febriamansyah, R. and Nurpasari, F.
Public Perceptions on the Problems of Kuranji River Basin Management in West Sumatera, Indonesia.
DOI: 10.5220/0009903500002480
In Proceedings of the International Conference on Natural Resources and Sustainable Development (ICNRSD 2018), pages 385-392
ISBN: 978-989-758-543-2
Copyright
c
2022 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
385
This paper explores community perceptions on
current issues and challenges, particularly on case
studies in one of the developing regions of
Indonesia. Was the concept of IWRM able to
address the problems and community conflicts of
water use?
2 METHODOLOGY
This research uses an exploratory approach with
qualitative and quantitative data collection methods.
Surveys were used to identify the community
perspective on the problems of the Kuranji River
from upstream to downstream. In addition,
qualitative data are collected from key informants by
using semi-structured interviews method and Focus
Group Discussion is done with relevant
stakeholders.
3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
3.1 Study Area
Batang Kuranji watershed is one of the watersheds
in Padang City which has an area of 202.7km
2
,
stretching from Pauh sub-district to North Padang
subdistrict and ending at the Indian Ocean.
The Kuranji River Basin originates in Sikai
Mountain and covers the Lambung Bukit sub-
district, Pauh sub-district. While the middle part of
Batang Kuranji includes other sub-districts of Pauh
sub-district and some sub-districts of Kuranji
District. The downstream area covers part of Kuranji
sub-district, Nanggalo sub-district and North Padang
sub-district.
Based on the GIS analysis, the Batang Kuranji
River Basin has a 202.70 km
2
watershed with the
main river length of 32.41 km and the total length of
the main river and other rivers within the watershed
are 274,75 km, thus the drainage density of the
Kuraanji River Basin reaches about 1.36 km/km
2
.
Batang Kuranji catchment area is a Bird Furtype
with a very high gradient with 1.36/km river density
with sub-watershed: Kuranji riverbed area is 19.86
km
2
with the main river length of 14.66 km, sub-
watershed Batang Belimbing 62.64km
2
with main
river length 17.08 km, Batang Sungkai Sub-basin
6km
2
with main river length 3.63 km, Batang
Janiah/Karuah-basin 82.26 km
2
with the length of
18,86 km, and Limau Manih sub-basin 31,93 km
2
with the main river length 16,42 km. The width of
the river in the middle of the Kuranji basin averages
50- 80m with a depth of 2m-3 m. The downstream
area of Kuranji basin has a width of 80m with an
average water
depth of 2m-3m.
Kuranji watershed is one of the existing river
basins in the city of Padang that stretches from Bukit
Barisan National Park to the District of North
Padang. Kuranji River Basin is the largest watershed
among several watersheds in the city of Padang.
This makes the Kuranji watershed as one of the main
water resources used for agricultural irrigation and
clean water. Kuranji River Basin area is also made
and important settlement for communities. The
Batang Kuranji in Padang city was also chosen
because it is one of the largest river basins in the
four river basin in Padang City, which is the main
source of water for agriculture and clean water for
most of Padang's inhabitants.
In general, Kuranji watershed catchment area in
the upstream area is still relatively good compared to
other watersheds. However, in recent years, there
have been floods in several areas along the Kuranji
watershed, causing destruction of the sub-watershed
of Limau Manih. Flash floods that hit the city of
Padang several years ago caused much damage to
the community and local government. The flooding
incidents were also closely related to the decrease in
land cover and high rainfall. In addition, differences
in river flow altitude are also one of the causes.
There are several factors that cause flooding.
These factors are natural conditions (geographical
location of the region, ground conditions, river
geometry and sedimentation), natural events (rainfall
and duration of rain, tides, backflows from major
rivers, river basin damming due to landslides,
sedimentation and cold lava flows), and human
activities in land-use changes that impact on
catchment areas which then affect the conditions and
changes in runoff changes (Irsyad & Ekaputra, 2015;
Kerr, 2007).
ICNRSD 2018 - International Conference on Natural Resources and Sustainable Development
386
3,3%
86%
10.7%
frequently occasionaly inrequently
In addition, a very significant difference in
height between the upstream, downstream and the
middle if the upstream of the water flow increases
can cause the downstream area to beflooded. These
floods can cause landslides that occur in the
upstream and downstream. Many community homes
and other infrastructure can be damaged by disasters
like these.
3.2 Public Perception on the Problems
in the Upstream Area
The upstream area of the Kuranji watershed is
located in the villages of Lambung Bukit, Pauh sub-
district with a total area of 38.80 km
2
. In this area
there are still rice fields, dense forests and
community settlements. In general, the social-
economic condition of the people of Lambung Bukit
village is the average livelihood as a farmer. The
population only reaches 3,650 people with a
population density of 94 people per km. The average
temperature in this region ranges from 23-28
o
C, with
an average rainfall of about 60.61 mm/month. The
peak of the rainy season occurs between October
and December. The recorded rainfall data from the
Climate Station in Batu Busuk shows that the
average annual rainfall in this basin is about 3,582
mm, and the highest in 2016 at about 4,549 mm.
Land use in highland watersheds is dominated by
protected forests and community-owned mixed
gardens (parak). These parak are generally grown
by highlanders with hard crops as the second source
of their income after rice farming and home gardens
near their settlements, such as durian, petai,
rambutan. Even in the last ten years, a number of
community members have tried to cultivate cacao
plants on the ground. Demographically, based on
survey results of respondents, the average age of
households living upstream about 45 years, where
one-third of them (33%) have lived there since they
were born. Approximately 36% of households are
migrants from outside the upstream areas who move
there after marriage. In general, nearly 50% of them
have lived in this upstream area for more than 40
years.In the context of livelihood strategies for their
daily life, 26.7% of HH (Households) have a high
dependence on upstream farming, while 67% of HH
rely on dryland and upland rice fields. Almost all
households mentioned that they have durian trees
and others such as petai and rambutan in their home
gardens and parak near the house.
Fi
g
ure 1: The Ma
p
of Kuran
j
i Watershe
d
Public Perceptions on the Problems of Kuranji River Basin Management in West Sumatera, Indonesia
387
Figure 2: Perception of Respondent to the Frequency of
Landslide.
The upstream Kuranji river catchment area is a
protected forest area. Key informants from this study
suspect that since forest cover degradation in
upstream catchment areas has reduced, this has
threatened the sustainability of their agricultural
activities downstream. For the past 10 years, local
residents have assumed that high rainfall in the
upstream during the rainy season will cause erosion
and flooding in their fields. Theyonly feel safe to
cultivate their fields in the dry season rather than the
rainy season. The high flow of water rainfall that
suddenly causes floods from the hills often resulting
in landslides in several locations.
Based on a survey respondents, about 3.3% of
respondents said landslides often occur around their
residential location, 86% of them said the
occurrence sometimes is not frequent, and the rest
says it rarely happens (Figure 2). Key informants
interviewed have also reinforced the problem of
floods and landslides in this area. Accordingly, all
this is closely related to the development of massive
timber exploitation in the upper reaches in the 80-
90s.
Figure 3: Knowledge of respondents about the availability
of Commercial Timber in Upstream.
The majority of respondents (50%) stated that
there is still considerable commercial timber
available in protected forest areas (Figure 3).
Furthermore, the majority of respondents (67%) also
stated that timber trees that are still available in
protected forests are mostly of a diameter of 40-
70cm.Only 6.7% of respondents stated that there
were still trees with diameters greater than 100cm.
Types of wood trees that exist in these forest
areas are bayur, mahony, kalek, and timbalun.
Currently, public awareness of land cover conditions
in upstream areas is higher than before. the mix-
garden (parak) has begun with the conception of
agroforestry, where existing wood species are
preserved or newly planted, such as durian and
petai. The upstream area is one of the areas that
needs conservation, one of them with reforestation
to increase the ability to withstand runoff. A
conservation area is a recommendation to reduce the
risk of flood disaster and erosion is LimauManih,
hillside, GunungSarik, Kuranji and LubukMinturun.
3,3%
86%
10.7%
frequently occasionaly inrequently
67%
6,7
%
Diamateroftrees≥40‐70cm
Diameteroftress≥100cm
ICNRSD 2018 - International Conference on Natural Resources and Sustainable Development
388
Figure 4: Community Participation at theUpstream Area
on Community Forestry Training Group
The Community Forestry Group, established in
2016, will be the main platform for communities in
the upstream watershed of Kuranji watershed to
contribute to conserving forests, preventing illegal
logging models while ensuring better local
livelihoods. To date, only 16.7% of respondents
have received training related to Community
Forestry Group activities, 83.3% of respondents
stated that they have not studied or even know much
about the activities of this group (Figure 4).
In the newera there was a policy on a five-year
development program (PELITA) in Indonesia that
led to massive logging to convert forest areas into
shifting cultivation areas. This is where the origin of
common problems that occur in the upstream area
that some people provide information that at the
time of high rainfall 5 to 10 years laterthreatened
paddy fields, thus threatening the livelihood of
farmers who seek paddy field farming. It was
delivered because the area of paddy fields adjacent
to the upper river basin area Kuranji stems of the last
few years are often submerged due to landslides.
In addition, the increasing rainfall that suddenly
caused flash flooding from the hills. This makes the
occurrence of erosion of mud accompanied by water
from the slope of the hill in the upstream area of
Batu Busuk village. As a result, the business of
horticulture farms such as chilli was affected and
damaged. Key informants mentioned that the
upstream ecosystem in the protected forest area is
still good but in the slopes a road is being built to
connect the village on the hill, so it is that if there is
high rainfall intensity it will be directly causing
floods that hit the upstream areas especially affected
paddy fields and cultivated areas under the slope of
the hill.
Then the problem that occurred from the issue of
flash flood in 2012 is the average society still not
care about the environment as it is throwing
household waste into the rivers. So there is a
blockage in the primary channels of the river flow
from upstream to the middle and downstream areas.
3.3 Public Perceptionson the Problems
in Themid-Stream Area
The central area of the Kuranji watershed is located
along Kuranji sub-district where the river flow
includes five villages namely Kuranji, Korong
Gadang, Kalumbuk, Laweh and Surau Gadang,
Gurun Laweh. Types of livelihoods are farmers to
employees.
3.3.1 Public Activities
The middlestream area of the Kuranji watershed is a
vital area in the management of Kuranji watershed
and for maintaining the ecosystem balance of the
Kuranji watershed. Community activities that utilize
the central area watershed will have an impact on the
community in its middle and downstream areas.
Various kinds of community activities are in the
middle of watersheds identified are agriculture,
illegal logging, factory industry, land clearing for
housing and sand mining into activities that affect
the balance of watershed ecosystems.
The middle section is mainly planted with paddy
fields 2-2,5 times in a year. Agricultural activities
are mostly done in Surau Gadang and Laweh Gurun.
Farmers in these two regions simultaneously plant
paddy field to ensure all farmers obtain the water
equally through regulations established by Farmers
Water User (Perkumpulan Petani Pengguna
Air/P3A). The land in both urban villages is difficult
to be planted horticulture commodities. This is
because when rains are heavy it is difficult to
dispose of excess water in their farms. Relatively flat
topography, land use and poor drainage are the main
causes of this. This has worsened the condition of
the middle zone, especially agricultural activities
that require a lot of water at the beginning of the
planting period.Industry plant built in the middle of
adding a series of existing activities. Construction of
factories that began with the reasons to build a pond
has now continued and changed with the drinking
water industry. The development of the factory
industry will obviously add to the problems that
17%
83%
Followed Yetfollow/unknown
Public Perceptions on the Problems of Kuranji River Basin Management in West Sumatera, Indonesia
389
occur in the middle of the watershed. This is proven
by changes in water quality in the middle of Kuranji
watershed.
Other activities include land conversion for
illegal housing and mining of sand. land clearing
created new problems that further aggravate the
condition of water quality flowing through the
middle of Kuranji watershed. According to the
responder's statement, the quality of water flowing
through the Kuranji watershed after the housing
construction can no longer be used directly for
bathing or washing the face. This is because the
colour and smell of water has changed, it was not as
clear as before.
3.3.2 Problems in the Middle-Stream Area
Heterogeneity of activities and interest in the middle
of Kuranji River Basin certainly causes obstacles for
both environment and society. These include
changes in the quality and quantity of water
resources, making accusations between upstream
and central areas, rivers and irrigation networks as
dump trucks, mutual cooperation in the maintenance
of irrigation networks began to fade, unfair water
distribution, irrigation network conditions, which is
not yet environmentally friendly, there was no
integration of water resource utilization and disaster
mitigation system and the land use change into
residential areas.
The quality of water resources flowing down the
middle of Kuranji watershed progressively
decreases. This is evident from the change of colour
and its smell - the water that flows through the
middle of this region is black and has an unpleasant
smell. While from the side of quantity, the water that
flows the middle area of Kuranji watershed is used
for many fields and wells of citizen.
The Kuranji watershed as a source of water for
household and agricultural needs is unable to meet
that need again today. Increasingly reduced water
supply for agriculture and unfavourable water
quality flowing into the paddy fields makes this a
problem that must be solved.
In addition to water resources problems that must
be solved, also other problems arising due to rivers
and irrigation networks as garbage dumps. These
problems cause a sustainable impact on the
environment and socioeconomic communities.
Waste discharged into rivers and irrigation networks
will lead to accumulation of waste in the upstream to
downstream areas. So some of the garbage carried
will be a source of disaster for the people in the
middle and downstream more mainstreamadding by
industry waste activities. So this raises a new
problem for the community that is the conflict of
mutual accusation between society.
3.4 Public Perception on the Problems
in the Downstream Area
The downstream area of the Kuranji watershed area
located in the district of Padang Utara. This area is
generally crowded by residential and commercial
areas. The total area is 1.12 Km
2
. for its own
downstream area on its right is the West Air Tawar
village. As the livelihood of the average citizen is
the trader.
The downstream part of the Kuranji watershed
starts from the back of the Basko Hotel towards the
estuary of the sea. Throughout this region, a "canal
flood" has been built to anticipate flooding which
has resulted in the erosion of the river bank. In
addition, there are two connecting bridges and one
Train Bridge. On the edge of the canal river there are
residential areas and also various kinds of human
activities.
The conditions in this section are strongly
influenced by human activities. Water colour
changes that occur in downstream hence can know
the quality of water flowing from upstream to
downstream. Where the water that flows down to
downstream is no longer as clear as water upstream.
The colour of blackened water more dominates.
Meanwhile, the water will meet directly at the sea.
In the downstream area of the Kuranji watershed
no longer exists mangrove forest. In addition, this
area also does not have agricultural land as in the
middle and upstream areas. The average community
livelihoods in this area are as fishermen and traders.
The more diverse community activities
downstream area of this Kuranji watershed is added
environmental problems and social communities
increased. Some problems arising from the various
activities that occur in the downstream area of
Kuranji watersheds such as floods, waste piles, fish
catch decreased, loss of mangrove forest area,
sedimentation of Kuranji watershed, an damage to
the Kuranji watershed area every year, and the
absence of river basin management mechanism.
Flood disasters are a problem occurring almost every
year in the downstream area of Kuranji watershed. A
large water discharge during the unstoppable rainy
season will directly inundate most of the
downstream area. The rising sea level that coincides
with the arrival of water from upstream and central
areas further exacerbates this situation. Since the
great flood in 1989, the city government tried to find
ICNRSD 2018 - International Conference on Natural Resources and Sustainable Development
390
help to overcome the problem. So finally in 1990 the
canalization of watersheds from Japan for the entire
river area in West Sumatera. Until now the floods in
the downstream region always occur every year but
not as severe as previous years.
The Floods which occurred each year is reaching
4 meters to meet the flood canals that have been
made. At the time of this research survey conducted
high water level that seemed to meet ¾ part of the
canal flood that has been built. It is suspected that
the flood problem occurring in every year is not only
caused by community activities in upstream areas
but also in the middle and downstream areas. Large
water flows and floods that occur every year not
only harm the community. Large direct water
currents will also carry sand or soil particles from
upstream to downstream. the dam function did not
work properly barrier rock or wood forest that
flowing from upstream. If this process occurs
continuously will appear deposition of sand or soil
called sedimentation.
Some community members in the downstream
section work as fishermen. Theor catch was more
when pre-construction of canal flood because fish
and another marine biota still often appeared in the
watershed area. The problem today felt difference by
the fishermen after the river basin development is
the difficulty of getting enough catches to meet the
economic needs of the fishing communities. This is
causing some fishermen to switch their livelihoods.
Many of fishermen have to catch fish in the ocean
area further away from the downstream area of this
Kuranji watershed. This is different compared to
before the canal was built when fishermen could
catch the fish in the watershed area alone without
having to go to sea.
The development of a flood canal project that
aims to reduce the risk of floods received by the
community requires clearing land in the downstream
area of the Kuranji watershed. So that causes some
of the mangrove forest area downstream area is cut
down. The loss of part of the mangrove forest area in
this area causes the balance of the downstream
ecosystem downstream. Some marine organisms that
live in symbiosis with mangroves or mangrove trees
to be moved to choose an area that suits their
required habitat. This lost mangrove forest area
needs to be the government's attention.
Complicated problems in the downstream area of
this Kuranji watershed. ranging from floods,
garbage, and sedimentation and also more worrying
to some people in this area is the degradation of land
that they occupy today. This is felt by the people
who live near the canals. The respondents said that
almost every year the surface of this land dropped
approximately 2 - 4 cm. They felt a deeper gap was
forming downstream at the end near the sea area.
This is a concern for some people. However, there
has been no special attention from the local
government.
The problems along the river basin are holistic,
multi-functionality of river basin, a different interest
that encourages conflict, all parties needed to
manage conflict, uncertainty alternative and result
because of disregard the decision process, the
meaning is law not beyond criticism (Mostert,
1999).
Watershed management is needed for the
realization of clean and safe river basins. The current
problem that is felt by some people in the
downstream area of Kuranji watershed is the
absence of comprehensive watershed management.
So this creates new problems that keep popping up
in the downstream area. For example, currently, the
water flowing downstream is black and brown. this
proves that in the upstream and central areas and
some downstream areas still occur waste disposal in
randomly to the city either household waste or
industry. This waste disposal is not yet well-
managed. So this causes losses in the downstream
community.
Problems that occur in downstream areas Kuranji
watershed needs to be a concern for the community
and government and the private sector. In the
conditions that occur as now, it is supposed to
downstream part of this Kuranji watershed done
improvements both physical buildings and
governance. But it is very unfortunate. Until now the
city government of Padang itself has not done much
for this area. It is required that the rules are
comprehensive and capable of coordinating all
parties involved in handling the Kuranji river basin
as common pool resource. Regarding resolving
water damage, synergy is needed between regions in
the form of role-sharing between the Province,
district sub-district, and or villages at upstream and
downstream areas. Integrated watershed
management should keep attention to the
relationship between a sector with the activities
sector to water supply because its component will
affect the other sectors (Handayani, 2013).
Various methods can be applied to conflict
resolution efforts in river basin basins, especially as
irrigation problems can be solved by analytic
hierarchical model. The model is utilized along the
river by involving the farmers on data assessment
(Febriamansyah, 2006). Furthermore, for conflicts
resolution that involving many parties, it is
Public Perceptions on the Problems of Kuranji River Basin Management in West Sumatera, Indonesia
391
necessary to do various stages of compromise to
reach an agreement whereby one party receives
compensation for the achievement of conflict
resolution. integrative conflict among conflicting
users by adding mediator roles. The resolution of
conflicts within the natural resources in Indonesia
could through mediation, reconciliation and
negotiation, which then establishes a communication
forum in resolving disputes and or through
arbitration if necessary (IWRM, 2018).No
optimization participatory approach based on the
IWRM and Dublin principle concept on river basin
Kuranji issues becomes the preliminary information
for decision makers to better maturing the rules and
utilize platform and forums active in dealing with
water resources issues. Water resources have
become common pool resources so many parties are
involved and the challenges faced become more
complex. collective action among users are needed
in the watershed system (Kerr, 2007).
4 CONCLUSION
Too late people realize water resources are a shared
resource and by that time the problems are
mounting. The current impact is still a lack of
understanding of the public that water is to be an
integral part of nature which is not separate within a
single system. This is evident in the case of river
basin water users against the problems faced today.
There are parties involved and pollute and destroy
the environment has not been dealt with firmly. To
be concluded that the management of water
resources Kuranji is not in accordance with the
principles of water use agreed to the world. the
emphasis in participatory approaches has not been
met as seen from the inadequacy of forums that
bridge the problems faced by the community to be
acted upon immediately by decision makers.
In addition, we need to strengthen legal
enforcement that binding to IWRM concept at basic
level to general level. On the other hand, integrated
management with experts to apply the rules and find
conflict resolution form some insight by scientist,
policy makers, users and the public is to be a
requirement.
REFERENCES
GWP (Global Water Partnership), 2000. Integrated Water
Resources Management. Global Water Partnership.
Stockholm.
Handayani, G.A., 2013. Urgency of Regulatory Priorities
Watershed in order to conduct Integrated Watershed
Administrative Law in Indonesia. The 1st
International Conference on Law, Business and
Government.
Irsyad, F., Ekaputra, E., 2015. Analisis Wilayah
Konservasi Daerah Aliran Sungai (DAS) Kuranji
dengan aplikasi SWAT. Jurnal Teknologi Pertanian
Andalas19(1).
Kerr, J., 2007. Watershed Management: Lessons from
Common Property Theory. International Journal of
the CommosI(1): 89-109.
Moster, E., 1999. Perspertives on River Basin
Management24(6): 563-569.
Febriamansyah, R., 2006. The Use of AHP Method for
Irrigation Water Allocation in a Small River Basin: A
case study in Tampo river basin in West Sumatera,
Indonesiain. IASC Conference(International
Association for the Study of the Commons).
Sheuman, W., 2001. Freshwater Resources and
Transboundary Rivers on the International Agenda:
from UNCED to Rio+10. Deutshes Institute fur
Entwicklungs politic Tulpenfeld, Bonn.
Stalnacke, D., Gooch, G., 2003. Integrated Scenarios-the
Keys for Successful Water and River Management.
Socio Economic, Diffuse Pollution Conference .
Dublin.
Sriyono, E., 2015. Retrieved May 15, 2018, from
http://www.researchgate.net/publication
ICNRSD 2018 - International Conference on Natural Resources and Sustainable Development
392