with this statement means local wisdom comes from
the values, norms, rules of local culture that can be
used or used properly to regulate the life order of the
community itself.
Kartawinata (2011: 7) revealed that local wisdom
related to culture has an important meaning to
maintain the sustainability of culture, as well as to
maintain its sustainability. What's more, at this time
many foreign cultures have been entered and
adopted by Indonesian society in general and the
local community in particular. Sibarani (2014: 116)
revealed that understanding local wisdom can be
approached through structural, cultural and
functional perspectives. From the structural
perspective, local wisdom is understood from the
uniqueness of the social structure that develops
within the community.
Then more clearly, Sibarani (2018:1) argues that
local wisdom consist of two types of core local
wisdoms, namely: 1. Local wisdom for people’s
welfare of prosperity and local wisdom for human
beings’ peacefulness or goodness. The local wisdom
having purpose to create peacefulness comprises the
politeness, honesty or integrity, social loyalty,
harmony, commitment, positive thinking and
compliments.
4.6 Concept of Revitalization
Revitalization is an attempt to revitalize an area or
part of a city that once lived but experienced a
decline or degradation. Revitalization is a process,
method, act of reviving or reviving (KBBI).
According to Danisworo (2002) revealed that the
revitalization approach must be able to recognize
and utilize the potential that exists in the
surrounding environment such as history, meaning,
as well as the uniqueness and image of the location.
Then Rais (2007) revealed that revitalization was an
attempt to revitalize an area or part of a city that had
once lived, but suffered a setback. In the
revitalization process, an aspect of the area that is
covered is improvement from physical, economic
and social aspects. In this case the revitalization
process is not only oriented to the completion of
physical beauty, but must be complemented by the
improvement of the economy of the community and
the introduction of existing culture to the next
generation.
4.7 Anthropolinguistics
Anthropolinguistics is a branch of the study of
culture. Duranti (1997: 2) says that linguistic
anthropology as the study of language as a cultural
resource and speaking as a cultural practice.
Linguistic anthropology as the study of language as
a cultural source and speaking or speaking as a
cultural practice. Furthermore Hymes (in Duranti
1997: 2) said that linguistic anthropology is as a
study of language and language in the context of
anthropology. "The study of speech and language
within the context of anthropology". Salzmann
(1998: 3) also says linguistic anthropology is the
study of language (language) within the framework
of anthropology. "The study of language (or speech)
within the framework of anthropology".
In addition, Foley (1997: 3) also said that
anthropological linguistics is a part of linguistics that
is related to the place of language in the social and
cultural context, which plays a role in shaping and
maintaining cultural practices and social structures.
"Anthropological linguistic is that subfield of
linguistics which is concerned with the place of
language in its wider social and cultural context, its
role in forging and sustaining cultural practice and
social structures". Sibarani (2004: 50) says that
anthropolinguistics is a branch of science that
studies the variety and use of language in relation to
the development of time, differences in places of
communication, kinship systems, the influence of
ethnic habits, beliefs, language ethics, customs, and
other cultural patterns from a tribe.
This study uses anthropolinguistic parameters,
namely: (1) interconnection, (2) Cultural Velues,
and (3) continuity. Assessment shows the meaning
or function, to the values or norms, and finally
comes to the local wisdom of the aspects examined.
Sustainability shows the state of the object under
study including its cultural value and inheritance in
the next generation of Sibarani, (2014: 319).
4.8 Oral Tradition
Pudentia (2007: 27) defines that oral tradition as a
discourse that is spoken or conveyed from
generation to generation includes oral and literary
ones, all of which are delivered orally. Lord (1995:
1) affirms oral tradition as something he speaks but
writes it down, and the recipient does not read it, but
hears it. Taylor (in Daud, 2008: 258), defines oral
tradition as materials produced by traditional
societies, in the form of narratives, traditional
customs, or practices, including rituals, traditional
ceremonies, folklore, folk songs, dances and games.
But this mode of delivery of oral traditions is not
only in the form of words, but also a combination of
certain words and actions that accompany the words.