quite high. While the determination coefficient is
obtained by R square value of 0.276 or 27.6%. This
means that in this case User satisfaction can be
explained by the variables X1, X2, X3 and X4. The
remaining 0.724 or 72.4% is explained by other
factors not examined in this study.
The results of this study are expected to help
Indonesia's National Government Internal Auditor,
especially the Regional Asset Application
Development Team, can improve the development
of the system for the convenience of users in
applying the system. The better quality of Regional
Assets Management Information System (RAMIS)
will impact on system effectiveness in managing
assets and making decisions about assets.
5 CONCLUSION
The purpose of this study is to explore the influence
of the Quality of regional assets management
information system (RAMIS) on user satisfaction in
the government of South Sumatra Province. The
quality of RAMIS is reliability, flexibility, response
time and ease of us.
Based on the results of these studies, it can be
concluded as follows: 1) Reliability, flexibility,
response time and ease of use has positive effect on
user satisfaction in the government of South Sumatra
Province means that reliability, flexibility, response
time and ease of use has a strong influence on the
optimization of User Satisfaction in the Government
of South Sumatra Province. meaning that the role of
Reliability, flexibility, Response Time and Ease of
use needed to assist the User Satisfaction to be
carried out optimally.
Variables Reliability, flexibility, Response Time
and Ease of use is able to explain variable User
Satisfaction equal to 27.6% while 27.6% is
explained by other variable.
REFERENCES
Alavi, M., & Gallupe, R.B. 2003. Using Information
Technologi in Learning: Case Studies in Business and
Management Education Programs. Academic of
Management Learning and Education, 2(2), 139-153.
Arikunto, S. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan
Praktik. Edisi Revisi VI. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Basuki, H & Abdurrachman, E. 2001. Analisis Peranan
Perangkat Lunak Komputer Bersifat Open Source
(Linux) Bagi Efisiensi dan Efektifitas Pemanfaatan
Teknologi Informasi. Universitas Bina Nusantara,
Laporan Teknis.
Bergensen, Bard M. 2008. User Satisfaction and
Influencing Issue. Artikel.
www.iu.hio.no/~frodes/rm/bard.pdf
Brookes, M. 2003. Higher Education: Marketing in A
Quasi-Commercial Service Industry. International
Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing,
8(2), 134-142.
Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, E.L.M. 1998. Beyond the
Productivity Paradox: Computers are the Catalyst for
Bigger Changes. Comunication of The ACM, 42(8),
49-55.
Chadhar, M. A. & Nasrin Rahmati. 2004. Impact Of
National Culture on ERP Systems Success.
Proceedings of The Second Australian Undergraduate
Students Computing Conference. pp. 23 – 31
Curry, J. R. 2000. The Organizational Challege: IT and
Revolution in Higher Education. Educause Review,
Maret/April, 40-48.
DeLone, W. H. & Ephraim R. McLean. 2003. The
DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems
Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management
Information Systems/Spring. 19 (4), 9 – 30.
Duggan, Evan W., & Han Reichgelt. 2006. The Panorama
of Information System Quality. Idea Group Inc. Paper
Gable, G. G., Darshana Sedera & Taizan Chan. 2003.
Enterprise Systems Success: A Measurement Model.
Journal of Twenty Four International Conference On
Information Systems, 576 – 591.
Garofalakis, J., Stefani, A., Stefanis, V., & Xenos, M.
2007. Quality Attributes Of Consumer – Based M –
Commerce Systems. IEEE International Conference
On E – Business and Telecommunication Networks.
Barcelona, 28 – 31 July. 130 – 136
Green, K.C. 1998. The Ninth Annual Survey of Desktop
Computing And Information Technology in Higher
Education, Encino, Ca: The Campus Computing
Project.
Guimaraes, T., D. S. Staples, & J. D. Keen. 2003
Empirically Testing Some Main User Related Factor
for Systems development Quality. Quality
Management Journal. Vol 10, No. 4, pp. 39 – 54
Illias, A., Mohammad R. Y., Mohammad Z. A. R., &
Rahida, A. R. 2007. The Study of End – User
Computing Satisfaction (EUCS) on Computerised
Accounting System (CAS) Among Labuan F. T
Government Sectors: A Case Study In the
Responsibility Centres. Labuan e – Journal of
Muamalat and Society. Vol 11, pp. 1 – 14
Istianingsih & Wijanto, S H.. 2008. Pengaruh Kualitas
Sistem Informasi, Perceived Usefullness, dan Kualitas
Informasi Terhadap Kepuasan Pengguna Akhir
Software Akuntansi. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi
XI. Pontianak: 23 – 25 Juli 2008
Janson, M. A., & Subramanian, A. 1996. Packaged
software: Selection and Implementation
Policies.INFOR, 34(2), 133-151.
Jawad, A. Q., & R. Reevess.1997. Successful Acquisition
of IT Systems. Working Paper.