while ttable value is 1.67 so that t > t-table that is
equal to 2.577 > 1.67 then the partial accrual
accounting positive influence on the behavior of the
apparatus. as well as to a significant degree in this
study indicates the number < 0.05 or 0.013 < 0.05
then the H2 can be accepted, meaning that accrual
accounting significantly influence the behavior of
the apparatus.
The magnitude of the variable t to support device
is -1.401 with a significant level of 0.167 while
ttable value is 1.67 so that t < t table that is equal to -
1.401 < 1.67 then partially supporting devices not
negatively affect the behavior of the apparatus. As
well as to a significant degree indicates the number
of > 0.05 or 0.167 > 0.05 then the H3 is rejected,
meaning that the device does not support a
significant
The device can support moderate the relationship
between good governance of the behavior of the
apparatus, it can be seen from the value of t > t table
and has a negative value that is equal to -3.018 >
1.67, as well as to a significant degree in this study
indicates the number < 0.05 is 0.04 < 0.05 then the
H5 accepted, it means supporting devices able to
moderate the relationship between good governance
of the behavior of the apparatus.
The device can support moderate the relationship
between the accrual of the behavior of the apparatus,
it can be seen from the value of t > t table and has a
negative value that is equal to -2.379 > 1.67, as well
as to a significant degree in this study indicates the
number < 0.05 is equal to 0.021 < 0.05 then the H6
accepted, it means supporting devices able to
moderate the relationship between the accrual of the
behavior of the apparatus.
Test results show that the variables of good
governance, accrual accounting and supporting
devices can only explain the behavior variable of the
apparatus at 96.3%. While the remaining 3.7% is
explained by other factors not included in this
research model.
H5 is accepted, meaning that the supporting
device is able to moderate the relationship between
good governance on the behavior of the apparatus.
H6 is accepted, meaning that the supporting device
is able to moderate the relationship between accrual
accounting to the behavior of the apparatus.
4.2 Discussion
4.2.1 The Effect of Good Governance on the
Behavior of the Apparatus
This hypothesis is rejected because it is based on the
testing, the value of the variable t good governance
is smaller than t-table value that is equal to 1.358 <
1.67 significance level is greater than the value of α
= 5% (0.181 > 0.05). It can be concluded H0 and H1
rejected. In other words, good governance does not
affect the behavior of the apparatus.
According (Yanwariyanidwi, 2015), when seen
from the progress of reform that has been running
for 12 years, the application of good governance in
Indonesia can not be said to succeed fully in
accordance with the ideals of the previous reforms.
There are still many fraud and leakage of budget
management and accounting are the two main
products of good governance.
Palembang still heard cases of corruption
involving government employees who worked for
the city of Palembang. This indicates that the
Palembang city government has yet to implement
the principles of governance goof so they raised the
cases of corruption and showing good behavior of
the apparatus.
4.2.2 The Effect of Accrual Accounting on
the Behavior of the Apparatus
This hypothesis is accepted because it is based on
the testing, the value of the variable t accrual is
greater than the value that is equal to 2,577 t table >
1.67 with a significance level of less than the value
of α = 5% (0.013 < 0.05). Therefore we can
conclude H2 H0 rejected and accepted.
In other words, accrual accounting have an
influence on the behavior of the apparatus. The
higher understanding about accrual accounting
personnel, the better the behavior of personnel in
managing local government finances. The results are
consistent with research (Sarwenda and Dina, 2015)
which states that the accrual accounting effect on the
behavior of the apparatus.
4.2.3 The Effect of Supporting Devices on
the Behavior of the Apparatus
This hypothesis is rejected because it is based on the
testing, the value of the variable t support device is
smaller than ttable value that is equal to -1.401 <
1.67 significance level is greater than the value of α
= 5% (0.167 > 0.05). It can be concluded H0 and H3