A Disciplined Innovation Approach to Health Technology Solutions

Noel Carroll, Ita Richardson

Abstract

Despite the potential of innovation-driven healthcare technology services to increase the quality, accessibility and quality of care, the realization and success of such promise has yet to be achieved. This prompted us to explore the barriers towards success for healthcare software companies and examine what frameworks are employed across industry to support their growth in the digital healthcare market. As part of a three-phase study, this article reports on the first phase – to synthesize the literature on the readiness factors for healthcare technology companies. The findings of this research will guide our second phase of this research in surveying industry healthcare software companies. In so doing, we can establish readiness factors for healthcare software companies with a view to offering a more structured and disciplined approach to healthcare innovation.

References

  1. Armenakis, A. A., Harris, S. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1993). Creating readiness for organizational change. Human relations, 46(6), 681-703.
  2. Aulet, B. (2013). Disciplined entrepreneurship: 24 steps to a successful startup. John Wiley & Sons.
  3. Becker, J., Knackstedt, R., & Pöppelbuß, D. W. I. J. (2009). Developing maturity models for IT management. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1(3), 213-222.
  4. Birkinshaw, J., Bouquet, C. and Barsoux, J.L. (2011), “The 5 myths of innovation”, MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 52 No. 2, pp. 43-50.
  5. Blommerde, T., & Lynch, P. (2016). A Maturity Matrix for Assessing Service Innovation Capability. In: Irish Academy of Management Conference 2016, 31 August - 2 September, UCD, Dublin.
  6. Carroll, N. (2016). Key Success Factors for Smart and Connected Health Software Solutions, Computer, Vol. 49, No. 11, pp. 32-38.
  7. Carroll, N., & Helfert, M. (2015). Service capabilities within open innovation: Revisiting the applicability of capability maturity models. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(2), 275-303.
  8. Carroll, N., & Richardson, I. (2016). Software-as-aMedical Device: Demystifying Connected Health Regulations. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 18(2), pp.186-215.
  9. Christensen, C.M. (1997). The Innovators Dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts.
  10. Christensen, C.M., Bartman, T., van Bever, D., Strategy, D. and Strategy, E., (2016). The Hard Truth About Business Model Innovation. MIT Sloan: Fall, Research Feature September 13.
  11. den Hertog, P., van der Aa, W., & de Jong, M. W. (2010). Capabilities for managing service innovation: towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Service Management, 21(4), 490-514.
  12. Dobni, C. B. (2008). Measuring innovation culture in organizations: The development of a generalized innovation culture construct using exploratory factor analysis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 11(4), 539-559.
  13. Gebauer, H., Paiola, M. and Edvardsson, B. (2012) 'A capability perspective on service business development in small and medium-sized suppliers', Scandinavian Journal of Management, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 321-339.
  14. Jalles, J. T. (2010). How to measure innovation? New evidence of the technology-growth linkage. Research in Economics, 64(2), 81-96.
  15. Kellermann, A. L., & Jones, S. S. (2013). What it will take to achieve the as-yet-unfulfilled promises of health information technology. Health Affairs, 32(1), 63-68. Chicago.
  16. Kohler, M., Feldmann, N., Habryn, F. and Satzger, G. (2013) 'Service Innovation Analytics: Towards Assessment and Monitoring of Innovation Capabilities in Service Firms', 46th International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 7-10 January, Hawaii.
  17. O'Leary, P., Carroll, N., & Richardson, I. (2014). The Practitioner's Perspective on Clinical Pathway Support Systems. In IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI), (pp. 194-201). IEEE.
  18. Paulk, M. C. (1995). The capability maturity model: Guidelines for improving the software process. Addison-Wesley Professional.
  19. Narayana, M. G. P. L. (2005). A framework approach to measure innovation maturity. In Proceedings. 2005 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, 2005. (Vol. 2, pp. 765-769). IEEE.
  20. Teece, D.J. (2009), Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management: Organizing for Innovation and Growth, Oxford University Press.
  21. Weiner, B.J., (2009). A theory of organizational readiness for change. Implementation Science, 4(1), p.1. Vancouver.
  22. Winter, S.G. (2003), “Understanding dynamic capabilities”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24 No. 10, pp. 991-995.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Carroll N. and Richardson I. (2017). A Disciplined Innovation Approach to Health Technology Solutions . In Proceedings of the 10th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies - Volume 5: HEALTHINF, (BIOSTEC 2017) ISBN 978-989-758-213-4, pages 389-395. DOI: 10.5220/0006228703890395


in Bibtex Style

@conference{healthinf17,
author={Noel Carroll and Ita Richardson},
title={A Disciplined Innovation Approach to Health Technology Solutions},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 10th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies - Volume 5: HEALTHINF, (BIOSTEC 2017)},
year={2017},
pages={389-395},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0006228703890395},
isbn={978-989-758-213-4},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 10th International Joint Conference on Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies - Volume 5: HEALTHINF, (BIOSTEC 2017)
TI - A Disciplined Innovation Approach to Health Technology Solutions
SN - 978-989-758-213-4
AU - Carroll N.
AU - Richardson I.
PY - 2017
SP - 389
EP - 395
DO - 10.5220/0006228703890395