A Formal Semantics for Concept Understanding Relying on Description Logics

Farshad Badie

Abstract

In this research, Description Logics (DLs) will be employed for logical description, logical characterisation, logical modelling and ontological description of concept understanding in terminological systems. It’s strongly believed that using a formal descriptive logic could support us in revealing logical assumptions whose discovery may lead us to a better understanding of ‘concept understanding’. The Structure of Observed Learning Outcomes (SOLO) model as an appropriate model of increasing complexity of humans’ understanding has supported the formal analysis.

References

  1. Franz Baader, Diego Calvanese, Deborah McGuinness, Daniele Nardi, and Peter Patel-Schneider. 2010. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
  2. Badie, Farshad. 2016a. Concept Representation Analysis in the Context of Human-Machine Interactions. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on e-Society. International Association for Development of the Information Society. Portugal.
  3. Badie, Farshad. 2016b. Towards Concept Understanding relying on Conceptualisation in Constructivist Learning, Proceedings of the 13th international conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age. International Association for Development of the Information Society. Germany.
  4. L.W. Barsalou. 1999. Perceptual Symbol Systems. The Behavioural and BrainSciences. Cambridge University Press.
  5. John B. Biggs, Kevin F. Collis. 2014. Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). Academic Press.
  6. Blackburn, Simon. 2016. The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Oxford University Press, Web.
  7. G. J. Chaitin. 1987. Algorithmic Information Theory. Cambridge University Press.
  8. John Davies, Dieter Fensel, Frank van Harmelen. 2003. Towards the Semantic Web', Ontology-Driven Knowledge Management. Wiley Online Publications.
  9. di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V. and Rizzolatti, G. 1992. Understanding Motor Events: A Neurophysiological Study, Exp Brain Res, 91, 176- 180.
  10. Heinz von Foerster. 2003. Understanding Understanding, Essays on Cybernetics and Cognition. SpringerVerlag-New York.
  11. Peter M. D. Gray, Krishna G. Kulkarni, and Norman W. Paton. 1992. Object-Oriented Databases - A Semantic Data Model Approach. Prentice Hall International Series in Computer Science. Prentice Hall.
  12. Stephan Grimm, Pascal Hitzler, and Andreas Abecker. 2007. Knowledge Representation and Ontologies. Semantic Web Services. Springer. 51-105.
  13. Honderich, T. 2005. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
  14. Ray Jackendoff. 1990. Semantic Structures. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.
  15. Walter Kintsch, David Welsch, Franz Schmalhofer and Susan Zimny. 1990. Sentence Memory: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of Memory and Language. Elsevier.
  16. D. MacKay. 2003. Information Theory, Inference and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University Press.
  17. Markus F. Peschl, Alexander Riegler. 1999. Does Representation Need Reality? Rethinking Epistemological Issues in the Light of Recent Developments and Concepts in Cognitive Science. Understanding Representation in the Cognitive Sciences. Springer US. pp 9-17.
  18. P. Resnik. 1999. Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 95-130.
  19. Sebastian Rudolph. 2011. Foundations of Description Logics. Reasoning Web. Springer. volume 6848 of LNCS.
  20. Manfred Schmidt-Schauss and Gert Smolka. 1991. Attributive Concept Descriptions with Complements. Artificial Intelligence. Elsevier.
  21. J. A. Simpson and E. S. C. Weiner. 1989. The Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press.
  22. Steffen Staab and Rudi Studer. 2009. Handbook on Ontologies. Springer Publishing Company. Incorporated, 2nd edition.
  23. Sebo Uithol, Iris van Rooij, Harold Bekkering and Pim Haselager. 2011. Understanding Motor Resonance: Journal of Social Neuroscience. Routledge. 6:4, 388- 397.
  24. Sebo Uithol, Markus Paulus. 2014. What do infants understand of others' action? A theoretical account of early social cognition. Psychological Research. Volume 78. Issue 5. pp 609-622
  25. Webb, J.. 2009. Understanding Representation. SAGE Publications.
  26. Zwaan, R. A. and Taylor, L. J.. 2006. Seeing, Acting, Understanding: Motor Resonance in Language Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135 (1). 1--11 .
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Badie F. (2017). A Formal Semantics for Concept Understanding Relying on Description Logics . In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2: ICAART, ISBN 978-989-758-220-2, pages 42-52. DOI: 10.5220/0006113800420052


in Bibtex Style

@conference{icaart17,
author={Farshad Badie},
title={A Formal Semantics for Concept Understanding Relying on Description Logics},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2: ICAART,},
year={2017},
pages={42-52},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0006113800420052},
isbn={978-989-758-220-2},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2: ICAART,
TI - A Formal Semantics for Concept Understanding Relying on Description Logics
SN - 978-989-758-220-2
AU - Badie F.
PY - 2017
SP - 42
EP - 52
DO - 10.5220/0006113800420052