Analysis of Processing Architectures for Wireless Sensor Networks

Ijeoma Okeke, Alastair Allen, David Hendry, Fabio Verdicchio

Abstract

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) are networks of low-cost communication devices with sensing and computational capabilities enabling remote, real-time measurement, monitoring and control of divers physical and environmental parameters. As WSNs are typically battery powered, energy-aware techniques are critical for extending its lifetime. Aside from energy-efficient communication protocols, distributed processing strategies are being explored whereby,computational capabilities of sensor nodes are utilised to locally process sensed data in order to reduce communication cost. However, as local processing increases, the impact of processing energy cost becomes significant creating a need to analyse WSNs under this emergent scenario as previous work have focused mostly on communication cost. We analysed the energy cost for WSN under different processing architectures. We used a fairness metric to quantify the fairness of energy cost distribution in the network. Our results showed a positive correlation between fairness and network lifetime. Hence, we argue that local processing can be exploited to reduce transmission and improve system performance without adversely reducing network lifetime. We conclude that although local processing marginally increases node energy consumption, it improves overall network life time as energy cost is evenly distributed in the network. Moreover, it enhances network maintenance as nodes have similar lifetimes.

References

  1. Baggio, A. (2005). Wireless sensor networks in precision agriculture. In ACM Workshop on Real-World Wireless Sensor Networks (REALWSN 2005), Stockholm, Sweden.
  2. Chang, J.-H. and Tassiulas, L. (2004). Maximum lifetime routing in wireless sensor networks. Networking, IEEE/ACM Transactions on, 12(4):609-619. ID: 16.
  3. Chong, S. K., Gaber, M. M., Krishnaswamy, S., and Loke, S. W. (2011). Energy-aware data processing techniques for wireless sensor networks: a review, pages 117-137. Transactions on large-scale data-and knowledge-centered systems III. Springer.
  4. Halgamuge, M. N., Zukerman, M., Ramamohanarao, K., and Vu, H. L. (2009). An estimation of sensor energy consumption. Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, (12):259-295. Cited By :34.
  5. Heinzelman, W. B., Chandrakasan, P., and Balakrishnan, H. (2002). An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun, 1(4):660-670.
  6. Heinzelman, W. R., Chandrakasan, A., and Balakrishnan, H. (2000). Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In System Sciences, 2000. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on, page 10 pp. vol.2. ID: 1.
  7. Jafari, R., Encarnacao, A., Zahoory, A., Dabiri, F., Noshadi, H., and Sarrafzadeh, M. (2005). Wireless sensor networks for health monitoring. In Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Networking and Services, 2005. MobiQuitous 2005. The Second Annual International Conference on, pages 479-481. IEEE.
  8. Jain, R., Chiu, D.-M., and Hawe, W. (1998). A quantitative measure of fairness and discrimination for resource allocation in shared computer systems.
  9. Othman, M. F. and Shazali, K. (2012). Wireless sensor network applications: A study in environment monitoring system. In Procedia Engineering, volume 41, pages 1204-1210. Cited By :21.
  10. Pantazis, N. A., Nikolidakis, S. A., and Vergados, D. D. (2013). Energy-efficient routing protocols in wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 15(2):551-591. Cited By :34.
  11. Wang, M., Cao, J., Chen, B., Xu, Y., and Li, J. (2007). Distributed processing in wireless sensor networks for structural health monitoring, volume 4611 LNCS of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics). Cited By :5.
  12. Wang, Q., Hempstead, M., and Yang, W. (2006). A realistic power consumption model for wireless sensor network devices. In Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, 2006. SECON 7806. 2006 3rd Annual IEEE Communications Society on, volume 1, pages 286-295. ID: 10.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Okeke I., Allen A., Hendry D. and Verdicchio F. (2016). Analysis of Processing Architectures for Wireless Sensor Networks . In Proceedings of the 5th International Confererence on Sensor Networks - Volume 1: SENSORNETS, ISBN 978-989-758-169-4, pages 129-136. DOI: 10.5220/0005735701290136


in Bibtex Style

@conference{sensornets16,
author={Ijeoma Okeke and Alastair Allen and David Hendry and Fabio Verdicchio},
title={Analysis of Processing Architectures for Wireless Sensor Networks},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 5th International Confererence on Sensor Networks - Volume 1: SENSORNETS,},
year={2016},
pages={129-136},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005735701290136},
isbn={978-989-758-169-4},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 5th International Confererence on Sensor Networks - Volume 1: SENSORNETS,
TI - Analysis of Processing Architectures for Wireless Sensor Networks
SN - 978-989-758-169-4
AU - Okeke I.
AU - Allen A.
AU - Hendry D.
AU - Verdicchio F.
PY - 2016
SP - 129
EP - 136
DO - 10.5220/0005735701290136