Optimal Feature-set Selection Controlled by Pose-space Location

Klaus Müller, Ievgen Smielik, Klaus-Dieter Kuhnert

Abstract

In this paper a novel feature subset selection method for model-based 3D-pose recovery is introduced. Many different kind of features were applied to correspondence-based pose recovery tasks. Every single feature has advantages and disadvantages based on the object’s properties like shape, texture or size. For that reason it is worthwhile to select features with special attention to object’s properties. This selection process was the topic of several publications in the past. Since the object’s are not static but rotatable and even flexible, their properties change depends on there pose configuration. In consequence the feature selection process has different results when pose configuration changes. That is the point where the proposed method comes into play: it selects and combines features regarding the objects pose-space location and creates several different feature subsets. An exemplary test run at the end of the paper shows that the method decreases the runtime and increases the accuracy of the matching process.

References

  1. Amanatiadis, A., Kaburlasos, V. G., Gasteratos, A., and Papadakis, S. E. (2011). Evaluation of shape descriptors for shape-based image retrieval. Image Processing, IET, 5(5):493-499.
  2. Chen, C., Yang, Y., Nie, F., and Odobez, J.-M. (2011). 3d human pose recovery from image by efficient visual feature selection. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 115(3):290-299.
  3. Chen, C., Zhuang, Y., and Xiao, J. (2010). Silhouette representation and matching for 3d pose discriminationa comparative study. Image and Vision Computing, 28(4):654-667.
  4. Chen, C., Zhuang, Y., Xiao, J., and Wu, F. (2008). Adaptive and compact shape descriptor by progressive feature combination and selection with boosting. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2008. CVPR 2008. IEEE Conference on, pages 1-8. IEEE.
  5. Choi, C., Christensen, H., et al. (2010). Real-time 3d model-based tracking using edge and keypoint features for robotic manipulation. In Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2010 IEEE International Conference on, pages 4048-4055. IEEE.
  6. Collet, A., Martinez, M., and Srinivasa, S. S. (2011). The moped framework: Object recognition and pose estimation for manipulation. The International Journal of Robotics Research, page 0278364911401765.
  7. Hinterstoisser, S., Benhimane, S., and Navab, N. (2007). N3m: Natural 3d markers for real-time object detection and pose estimation. In Computer Vision, 2007. ICCV 2007. IEEE 11th International Conference on, pages 1-7. IEEE.
  8. Kazmi, I. K., You, L., and Zhang, J. J. (2013). A survey of 2d and 3d shape descriptors. In Computer Graphics, Imaging and Visualization (CGIV), 2013 10th International Conference, pages 1-10. IEEE.
  9. Müller, K., Schlemper, J., Kuhnert, L., and Kuhnert, K.- D. (2014). Calibration and 3d ground truth data generation with orthogonal camera-setup and refraction compensation for aquaria in real-time. In VISAPP (3), pages 626-634.
  10. Payet, N. and Todorovic, S. (2011). From contours to 3d object detection and pose estimation. In Computer Vision (ICCV), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, pages 983-990. IEEE.
  11. Pons-Moll, G. and Rosenhahn, B. (2011). Model-based pose estimation. In Visual analysis of humans, pages 139-170. Springer.
  12. Poppe, R. and Poel, M. (2006). Comparison of silhouette shape descriptors for example-based human pose recovery. In Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 2006. FGR 2006. 7th International Conference on, pages 541-546. IEEE.
  13. Rasines, I., Remazeilles, A., and Iriondo Bengoa, P. M. (2014). Feature selection for hand pose recognition in human-robot object exchange scenario. In Emerging Technology and Factory Automation (ETFA), 2014 IEEE, pages 1-8. IEEE.
  14. Reinbacher, C., Ruether, M., and Bischof, H. (2010). Pose estimation of known objects by efficient silhouette matching. In Pattern Recognition (ICPR), 2010 20th International Conference on, pages 1080-1083. IEEE.
  15. Rosenhahn, B., Brox, T., Cremers, D., and Seidel, H.-P. (2006). A comparison of shape matching methods for contour based pose estimation. In Combinatorial Image Analysis, pages 263-276. Springer.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Müller K., Smielik I. and Kuhnert K. (2016). Optimal Feature-set Selection Controlled by Pose-space Location . In Proceedings of the 11th Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications - Volume 4: VISAPP, (VISIGRAPP 2016) ISBN 978-989-758-175-5, pages 200-207. DOI: 10.5220/0005724902000207


in Bibtex Style

@conference{visapp16,
author={Klaus Müller and Ievgen Smielik and Klaus-Dieter Kuhnert},
title={Optimal Feature-set Selection Controlled by Pose-space Location},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 11th Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications - Volume 4: VISAPP, (VISIGRAPP 2016)},
year={2016},
pages={200-207},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005724902000207},
isbn={978-989-758-175-5},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 11th Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications - Volume 4: VISAPP, (VISIGRAPP 2016)
TI - Optimal Feature-set Selection Controlled by Pose-space Location
SN - 978-989-758-175-5
AU - Müller K.
AU - Smielik I.
AU - Kuhnert K.
PY - 2016
SP - 200
EP - 207
DO - 10.5220/0005724902000207