The State of the Art in the Development of a Versatile Argumentation System based on the Logic of Multiple-valued Argumentation

Satoru Tannai, Shogo Ohta, Takeshi Hagiwara, Hajime Sawamura, Jacques Riche

2013

Abstract

This paper reports on the state of the art in the development of a versatile argumentation system in which various auxiliary features for argumentation are incorporated. Such an argumentation system was built on our underlying argumentation system, LMA: the Logic of Multiple-valued Argumentation, aiming at promoting our understanding of argumentation processes. We in particular present some very new and unique aspects of computational argumentation: the syncretic argumentation, the argument mining and frequent sub-argument discovery, the argument metamorphosis from symbol to animation via natural language, Eastern argumentation based on Indian logic, and the argumentation based on symbolism and connectionism. Such a hybridization of various features would broaden the scope of the applications of computational argumentation in various ways.

References

  1. Araucaria (2008). Araucaria version3.1-USER MANUAL-.
  2. Caminada, M. (2006). Semi-stable semantics. In Dunne, P. E. and Bench-Capon, T. J. M., editors, Computational models of argument: proceedings of COMMA 2006, volume 144 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, pages 121-130. IOS Press.
  3. Davey, B. A. and Priestley, H. A. (2002). Introduction to Lattices and Order. Cambridge.
  4. DMD (2008). Digital Movie Director. movie-school.org/.
  5. Dung, P. (1995). On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logics programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77:321-357.
  6. Ganeri, J. (2001). Indian Logic. Curzon Press.
  7. Goto, Y., Hagiwara, T., and Sawamura, H. (2011). Neural networks computing the dungean semantics of argumentation. In NCTA 2011 - Proceedings of the International Conference on Neural Computation Theory and Applications, pages 5-14.
  8. Gotou, Y., Hagiwara, T., and Sawamura, H. (2011). Extracting argumentative dialogues from the neural network that computes the dungean argumentation semantics. In 7th International Workshop on NeuralSymbolic Learning and Reasoning(NESY2011). IEEE.
  9. Mahalakshmi, G. S. and Geetha, T. V. (2009). An indian logic-based argument representation formalism for knowledge-sharing. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 17(1):55-76.
  10. Makiguchi, W. and Sawamura, H. (2007). A hybrid argumentation of symbolic and neural net argumentation (part i, part ii). In Rahwan, I., Parsons, S., and Reed, C., editors, ArgMAS, volume 4946 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 197-215/216-233. Springer.
  11. Maruyama, Y., Hasegawa, T., Hagiwara, T., and Sawamura, H. (2012). Syncretic argumentation for multi-agents by lattice homomorphism, fusion and sum. In Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, 8th International Workshop, ArgMAS 2011, Revised Selected and Invited Papers, volume 7543 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 46-65. Springer.
  12. Narita, T. and Sawamura, H. (2008). An attempt to argument metamorphosis from symbols to moving images. In Proceedings of 2008 Joint Agent Symposium (JAWS2008).
  13. Rahwan, I. and Simari, G. R. E. (2009). Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Springer.
  14. Reed, C. and Rowe, G. (2004). Araucaria: Software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation. International Journal on Artificial Intelligence Tools, 13(4):983-.
  15. Sawamura, H. and Mares, E. (2004). How agents should exploit tetralemma with an eastern mind in argumentation. In Mike Barley and Nik Kasabov (eds.): Intelligent Agents and Multi-Agent Systems VII, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, volume 3371, pages 259-278.
  16. Sawamura, H., Takahashi, T., and Matsunaga, K. (2005). An eastern specialization of logic of multiple-valued argumentation to tetralemma originated in india. In Prasad, B., editor, IICAI, pages 1274-1291. IICAI.
  17. Schweimeier, R. and Schroeder, M. (2005). A parameterised hierarchy of argumentation semantics for extended logic programming and its application to the well-founded semantics. TPLP, 5(1-2):207-242.
  18. Seino, Y., Sawamura, H., and Hagiwara, T. (2011). Towards argument mining. In Proceedings of 2011 International Conference on Data Engineering and Internet Technology (DEIT 2011), pages 27-34. IEEE.
  19. Takahashi, T. and Sawamura, H. (2004). A logic of multiple-valued argumentation. In Proceedings of the third international joint conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems (AAMAS'2004), pages 800-807. ACM.
  20. Zaki, M. J. (2005). Efficiently mining frequent embedded unordered trees. Fundam. Inform., 66(1-2):33-52.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Tannai S., Ohta S., Hagiwara T., Sawamura H. and Riche J. (2013). The State of the Art in the Development of a Versatile Argumentation System based on the Logic of Multiple-valued Argumentation . In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2: ICAART, ISBN 978-989-8565-39-6, pages 217-224. DOI: 10.5220/0004198902170224


in Bibtex Style

@conference{icaart13,
author={Satoru Tannai and Shogo Ohta and Takeshi Hagiwara and Hajime Sawamura and Jacques Riche},
title={The State of the Art in the Development of a Versatile Argumentation System based on the Logic of Multiple-valued Argumentation},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2: ICAART,},
year={2013},
pages={217-224},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004198902170224},
isbn={978-989-8565-39-6},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 2: ICAART,
TI - The State of the Art in the Development of a Versatile Argumentation System based on the Logic of Multiple-valued Argumentation
SN - 978-989-8565-39-6
AU - Tannai S.
AU - Ohta S.
AU - Hagiwara T.
AU - Sawamura H.
AU - Riche J.
PY - 2013
SP - 217
EP - 224
DO - 10.5220/0004198902170224