EVALUATION OF DATABASE TECHNOLOGIES FOR USAGE IN DYNAMIC DATA MODELS - A Comparison of Relational, Document Oriented and Graph Oriented Data Models

Alexander Wendt, Benjamin Dönz, Stephan Mantler, Dietmar Bruckner, Alexander Mikula

2012

Abstract

Database technologies are evaluated in respect to their performance in model extension, data integration, data access, querying and distributed data management. The structure of the data sources is partially unknown. Additional value is gained combination of data sources. Data models for a relational, a document and a graph oriented database are compared showing strengths and weaknesses of each data model.

References

  1. AllegroGraph (n. d.), AllegroGraph® RDFStore 4.2.1. Retrieved June 14, 2011, from http://www.franz.com/ agraph/allegrograph
  2. Amazon (n. d.), Amazon SimpleDB. Retrieved June 14, 2011, from http://aws.amazon.com/de/simpledb/
  3. Brewer E. (2000). Towards robust distributed systems. (Invited Talk) Principles of Distributed Computing, Portland, Oregon.
  4. Fay C., Dean J., Ghemawat S., Hsieh W. C., Wallach D. A., Burrows M., Chandra T., Fikes A., Gruber R. E. (2006). Bigtable: A Distributed System for Structured Data. In OSDI'06: Seventh Symposium on Operating System Design and Implementation. Seattle, WA, November, 2006.
  5. Hay, D. C. (1995). Data Model Patterns: Conventions of Thought, Dorset House, ISBN-13: 978-0932633293, ISBN-10: 0932633293, USA
  6. Hay, D. C. (1997). Advanced Data Model Patterns, Essential Strategies, Inc. Retrieved June 20, 2011, from http://www.essentialstrategies.com/publications/ modeling/advanceddm.htm
  7. Levitt, N. (2010). Will NoSQL Databases Live Up to Their Promise? in Computer 43 Issue:2, doi:10.1109/MC.2010.58
  8. MongoDB (n. d.). MongoDB, Retrieved July 22, 2011, from http://www.mongodb.org
  9. PostGIS (n. d.). PostGIS, Retrieved June 21, 2011, from http://postgis.refractions.net
  10. PostgreSQL (n. d.). PostgreSQL, Retrieved June 21, 2011, from http://www.postgresql.org
  11. SAS (n. d.), SAS® Enterprise Data Integration Server. Retrieved July 25, 2011 from http://www.sas.com/ software/data-management/entdiserver/index.html
  12. Seth G., Nancy L. (2002). Brewer's conjecture and the feasibility of consistent, available, partition-tolerant web services. In ACM SIGACT News, Volume 33 Issue 2, June 2002, ACM New York, NY, USA
  13. Stonebraker, M. (2010). SQL databases v. NoSQL databases, in Communications of the ACM Volume 53 Issue 4, New York, NY, USA
  14. Vassiliadis, P., Simitsis, A., Skiadopoulos, S. (2002). Conceptual Modeling for ETL Processes, in Proc. 5th International Workshop on Data Warehousing and OLAP (DOLAP 2002), McLean, USA
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Wendt A., Dönz B., Mantler S., Bruckner D. and Mikula A. (2012). EVALUATION OF DATABASE TECHNOLOGIES FOR USAGE IN DYNAMIC DATA MODELS - A Comparison of Relational, Document Oriented and Graph Oriented Data Models . In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1: ICAART, ISBN 978-989-8425-95-9, pages 219-224. DOI: 10.5220/0003714202190224


in Bibtex Style

@conference{icaart12,
author={Alexander Wendt and Benjamin Dönz and Stephan Mantler and Dietmar Bruckner and Alexander Mikula},
title={EVALUATION OF DATABASE TECHNOLOGIES FOR USAGE IN DYNAMIC DATA MODELS - A Comparison of Relational, Document Oriented and Graph Oriented Data Models},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1: ICAART,},
year={2012},
pages={219-224},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003714202190224},
isbn={978-989-8425-95-9},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1: ICAART,
TI - EVALUATION OF DATABASE TECHNOLOGIES FOR USAGE IN DYNAMIC DATA MODELS - A Comparison of Relational, Document Oriented and Graph Oriented Data Models
SN - 978-989-8425-95-9
AU - Wendt A.
AU - Dönz B.
AU - Mantler S.
AU - Bruckner D.
AU - Mikula A.
PY - 2012
SP - 219
EP - 224
DO - 10.5220/0003714202190224