The Teaching-Learning-Lab
Digital Literacy and Computational Thinking for Everyone
Heike Demarle-Meusel, Barbara Sabitzer and Julia Sylle
Institute of Informatics Didactics, Alpen-Adria-University, Klagenfurt, Austria
Keywords: Teaching, Learning, Computational Thinking, Digital Literacy.
Abstract: As advancement of the already successful Informatics Lab in 2016 a Teaching-Learning-Lab (TLL) was im-
plemented with the main aim of supporting all teacher education departments of our university to teach and
practice digital literacy and computational thinking as “fundamental skill for everyone” (Wing, 2006) in dif-
ferent ways. Our support is based on three pillars: equipment, know-how and research. Scientists, (future)
teachers and students can use the rooms (creative, experimental and observation lab), the technical equip-
ment and instructional technology for planning, designing, holding and/or observing and analyzing teaching
units. We offer workshops for digital literacy and computational thinking in and for different subjects. Our
main research focuses on the connection of computational thinking to other disciplines and its impact on
problem solving and text comprehension. Furthermore, the Teaching-Learning-Lab offers research
possibilities for scientists and students in different areas concerning teaching and learning. We enhance
cooperation between schools and university and give support in finding research questions for master or
PhD-theses in didactics, conducting teaching experiments. The paper describes challenges and opportunities
of the Teaching-Learning-Lab in fostering the digital literacy competences and computational thinking of
the target groups.
1 INTRODUCTION
In 2006 Jeannette Wing postulated that compu-
tational thinking (CT) should be „a fundamental skill
for everyone, not just for computer scientists“
(Wing, 2006). She describes computational thinking
as a complex skill, which is fundamental to manage
future life’s challenges. It’s a way to think in
different levels of abstraction, for which theories and
tools from computer science can be used helpfully.
Computational thinking includes problem-solving
skills, which are needed in any domain and therefore
should be trained as well as possible in primary and
secondary education. Within these 11 years, many
positive developments can be determined. For
example, the importance of computational thinking
is fixed in the curriculum since 2014 for K-12
schools in England (Wing, 2016). Unfortunately,
public schools do not always cover this demand
adequately in Austria. The government responds to
this lack lately. In January 2017 the Austrian Federal
Ministry of Education presented the digitizing
strategy with the aim of fostering the digital literacy
starting at primary school level.
An extra-curricular initiative with the same aim
is the Informatics Lab, which is part of the Regional
Educational Competence Centre (RECC) of Infor-
matics at the Alpen-Adria-University Klagenfurt. It
aims at implementing computational thinking as a
general (learning and problem solving) skill by
addressing children and their parents as well as
teachers and teacher educators of all subjects. The
main concern is to show, that computer science
concepts and techniques (e.g. modeling with UML-
diagrams) understood as higher order thinking skills,
can be useful and motivating tools for teaching and
learning in different subjects. Wing (2016)
postulates that a main research question is to find out
what computer science theories should be taught, at
which age and how. In the Informatics-Lab we have
positive experiences with teaching the concept of
modeling and transferring it to different subjects
(Sabitzer and Pasterk, 2015). The main focus in the
Informatics-Lab is on creating teaching and learning
materials to foster computational thinking skills in
children. One special aspect is that we create
materials, which are independent of a computer,
166
Demarle-Meusel, H., Sabitzer, B. and Sylle, J.
The Teaching-Learning-Lab - Digital Literacy and Computational Thinking for Everyone.
DOI: 10.5220/0006367001660170
In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2017) - Volume 2, pages 166-170
ISBN: 978-989-758-240-0
Copyright © 2017 by SCITEPRESS Science and Technology Publications, Lda. All rights reserved
following in part the ideas of CS Unplugged (Bell,
2011)
To get a more widespread effect and focus on
additional target groups, the Informatics-Lab was
extended to a Teaching-Learning-Lab (TLL) for
students and teacher educators as well as teachers.
Learning-Labs are characterized by presenting a
setting, in which persons are able to work on
practical problems. Ideally in groups of two or three
persons problems were discussed and possible
solutions were developed. After this process,
proposed solutions can be evaluated based on
assessment criteria (Flechsig, 1979). Repenning’s
(2015) understanding of computational thinking
based on the assumption of Wing (2016) focused on
the same trisections: 1. Formulating the problem 2.
Representation of a solution and 3. Implementation
and evaluation of the solution. In the setting
presented by the TLL, the learner takes an active
role, according to the principle of participation and
designs his/her own learning process (Pallasch and
Reimers, 1990). The learning opportunities in the
TLL are consistent with the concept of CT.
Our main research focuses on how to create a
setting, which is fruitful to disseminate the idea of
computational thinking as a fundamental skill. It is
intended that the setting of the TLL is able to foster
the ability of computational thinking in different
target groups. In the following sections, the
development of the TLL and its offers are described.
Furthermore, we discuss the challenges we are
facing with and the opportunities we see for the
future.
2 THE TEACHING-LEARNING-
LAB
The Teaching-Learning Lab is initiated and
managed by the School of Education, a division
within the Alpen-Adria-University Klagenfurt that is
devoted to the field of teacher education, located in
the Lakeside Science & Technology Park.
The TLL is dedicated to supporting and streng-
thening the teaching community of our University
providing academic researchers, teachers, students
and pupils with unique opportunities to create
learning environments using the power of know-
ledge and the promise of education. It offers a varie-
ty of resources and services on teaching and learning
ranging from group events (e.g. workshops, learning
communities, teaching demonstrations) to perso-
nalized approaches to teaching and learning en-
hancement (e.g. classroom observations, books and
other resources on teaching).
2.1 The Contents
2.1.1 Teaching and Learning
The TLL provides support for continuous innovation
in and enhancement of teaching and learning. This
includes workshops, meetings and conversations on
a variety of teaching and learning topics. Each
appointment offers the opportunity to discuss and
share experiences on current issues in teaching and
learning with focused support around topics such as
teaching and learning techniques and common
pedagogical challenges. The TLL also provides
opportunity and support to engage deeply in
collaborative discussions about enhancing teaching
and learning. Participants are invited to meet
regularly throughout the academic year to explore a
specific area of interest with the opportunity to
develop professional knowledge and skills through
activities such as workshops, discussions and
readings. Furthermore, all participants can benefit
from our pool of ideas, expertise and materials for
their own teaching or learning as well as for research
in all related fields.
2.1.2 Learning Technologies
The TLL provides computing and multimedia
resources to meet a wide variety of technology
needs. The setting allows testing the usability of
multiple products including 3D printing, image
processing (e.g., Photoshop), web design and other
software designed to meet the needs for technology-
enhanced space for individual and group learning
and teaching.
Laptops and tablets enable visitors to connect,
collaborate, and interact individually or collectively.
The TLL is also equipped with a digital SMART
Board, which can be used for a variety of applica-
tions.
There are also workarounds that enable visitors
to record audio and video for peer and self-
assessments. Educators can use the audio and video
equipment to hone their instructional delivery by re-
cording themselves and analyzing their own perfor-
mances as they view the reactions of participants.
Not only can content be captured and reviewed,
there is also the possibility of live-streaming inter-
acttive audio and video presentations, lectures and
meetings to individuals or groups with the option to
view content live in a room, adjacent to the main
The Teaching-Learning-Lab - Digital Literacy and Computational Thinking for Everyone
167
room, to provide helpful feedback in the develop-
ment and evaluation process.
2.1.3 Developing and Disseminating
The TLL works with participants to develop
“reusable educational material” and the broader field
of education, including teaching cases, simulations,
assessments, activities and other assets.
As a unit within the Alpen-Adria-University
Klagenfurt, the TLL establishes and maintains
collaborative relationships with other departments of
the University, including the departments of teacher
education, as well as with schools and other
educational institutions. The TLL also provides a
forum for testing and can be used for many different
research purposes assisting with focus groups,
comprised of pupils and their teachers from primary
and secondary schools.
2.2 Resources Available
The TLL is an active learning and research space
that is designed to support, develop and evaluate
innovative and effective approaches to teaching and
learning providing academic researchers, teachers,
students and pupils with unique opportunities to
explore active learning pedagogies. The Teaching-
Learning-Lab includes several independent labs:
The InformaticsLab is an open lab for children
between four and fifteen years enabling them to get
in touch with technology and to explore the basic
principles and concepts of computer science and
digital literacy in a playful and exciting way.
The CreativeLab is a facility for teaching, re-
search and creative collaboration, which offers hard-
ware (set up for use), a specialist library (the collec-
tion currently includes popular didactics books,
books on computer science, textbooks, teaching re-
sources, journals, current periodical titles) and an
interactive SMART Board.
The TeachingLab is a large multipurpose class-
room equipped with video and audio technology
(with potential for audio-video-based teaching
observations) supporting seminars, lectures,
meetings and presentations
The LivingLab is fully equipped small apartment,
a platform that encourages application of knowledge
to the real-world context implementing different
smart technologies and models. It further offers the
possibility to do research on informal learning or
behavioral studies.
The ControlRoom is an area equipped with com-
puters and designated for the monitoring and
operation of the entire technical infrastructure to
ensure that the most appropriate technology is
specified for each individual project. It allows parti-
cipants to observe, record and analyze e.g. lessons
with school classes in order to improve their own
teaching.
2.3 Target Groups
Current teachers and new graduates
The TLL is deeply involved in supporting current
teachers and new graduates entering the teaching
profession. Lab classrooms provide the context to
experience in-depth, sustained professional growth
within a collaborative learning community with a
variety of instructional materials (videos, simula-
tions, worksheets etc.) and technology to support the
teaching process.
Academic professionals
The Labs provide an authentic opportunity for
academics and researchers to see ideas in practice
with the possibility to share knowledge with other
participants and benefit from opportunities to self-
assess, self-monitoring and peer review to make
judgments about their teaching receiving feedback
from others.
Students
The TLL allows students to hone in on their
areas of study while being presented with the
opportunity to use all available resources. The Lab
also offers interesting and challenging semester and
master projects for students providing help in
finding and adjusting research questions.
Students are welcome to brainstorm with other
participants and get academic support and additional
input on teaching and learning with variety of
technologies to support teaching, learning, and
assessment. Especially teacher students are welcome
to give lessons to or get involved in projects with
our partner schools in order to get more practice
before entering their school life.
Pupils
Pupils can take advantage of the wealth
of academic support and resources provided. They
can also take the opportunity of internships with the
Science and Technology Park being a perfect
location to host collaborative research and diploma
projects. Furthermore, they can discover computer
science concepts, train their digital competences and
learn to apply technology and some useful computer
science techniques (e.g. modeling) in order to sup-
CSEDU 2017 - 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education
168
port their own learning (see also section 3.2 CT for
everyone).
3 CHALLENGES AND
OPPORTUNITIES
The lately implemented Teaching-Learning-Lab has
great potential in fostering computational thinking
and digital literacy within teachers, students and pu-
pils. Achieving this objective involves handling so-
me challenges we are facing. On the other hand,
these challenges are great opportunities in order to
advance the research in computational thinking
(CT).
3.1 Assessment of CT
Assessment of CT often goes hand in hand with
analyzing programming capabilities (Werner et al.,
2012; Fields et al., 2012; Han Koh et al., 2010). A
significant challenge in research is to design an
assessment tool for CT, because we are teaching this
way to think and handle problems often without
using technology equipment like programming
software. A main research question will focus on
developing an assessment tool to map CT processes
regardless of programming software. Our main
research will focus on the transferring process of
patterns underlying computational thinking. Our
opinion is that if people are able to use e.g. the
concept of modeling adapted for their specific
problem or the whole subject, they implemented this
way of thinking in their everyday life.
In our research we will support this transfer
process in different ways. The first step is that they
will get used to the concepts and way of use of
computational thinking. Materials and tasks will be
presented and are ready to use. In a second step, they
will be strengthened in using and transferring their
knowledge, in finding solutions for problems they
are facing, e.g. “how can I implement this didactical
method within my lesson?” One possible way we
see is in the process of transfer knowledge into
different subjects. If teachers, students or pupils are
able to use a certain tool or method to get to a
solution in their own created question/problem – we
get to know, if the way to solve a problem focuses
on computational thinking. For this we have to
operationalize the main components of CT. Different
authors focus on different core components
constituting computational thinking. Wing (2008)
highlighted abstraction as prominent component.
The abstraction process is about to differentiate
important from unimportant content, or simplifying
from the concrete to the general (Barr and Stephen-
son, 2011). Whereas Barr and Stephenson (2011)
name nine main components of CT. Yadav et al.
(2017) define Computational Thinking as problem-
solving skill set – problem decomposition, algorith-
mic thinking, abstraction and automation. The
assessment of CT will be based on different theories
to create a set of indicators measuring the level of
CT.
3.2 CT for Everyone
The TLL focuses on different disciplines. An
important issue is to get persons from outside the
field in touch with CT. But how can we support
people to really understand the concept rather than
just using a tool? An ineffective way is to teach
them to the test. A big challenge is to impart this
way of thinking, the way to solve problems.
Teachers, especially from primary schools, have
lacking confidence teaching computer science. To
take this doubt, aspects of CT are connected with
their subjects. Teachers and students find out, which
benefit they have from using CT. Because of this
experience the inhibition threshold can be lowered.
The following figure shows an example of
introducing modeling in primary education. In this
case we use an entity-relationship diagram, which
usually visualizes the structure of a database. Figure
1 demonstrates that entity-relationship diagrams can
also be used in language lessons as a tool for plan-
ning and constructing new stories or for summa-
rizing a given text.
Figure 1: Entity-Relationship diagram “Fairy tale”.
3.3 Implement CT into University
Didactics
To get a widespread and long-term effect
implementing CT in teacher education as well as in
the Austrian school system, the setting of the TLL
holds great potential. As described above, the TLL
focuses on different target groups: teachers,
university professors, students and pupils. CT should
be a permanent part of the teacher education and
training. A big challenge is to implement this setting
The Teaching-Learning-Lab - Digital Literacy and Computational Thinking for Everyone
169
into the common university didactics. Different
offers will force this process, e.g. offering training in
digital literacy and CT for students. In the next years
we will face the challenge to foster CT in the context
of university didactics beginning with the concept of
modeling where we have already some positive
results.
4 CONCLUSIONS
Within this setting, the Teaching-Learning-Lab of
the School of Education has the possibility to
enhance the digital literacy efforts of the Austrian
government. The strategy will be implemented in the
next years in the Austrian school system. There will
be a need to educate teachers and students in the
field of digital literacy. The TLL will focus on im-
parting knowledge concerning digital competences;
our demands go far beyond that. As RECC (Re-
gional Educational Competence Centre) we focus on
computational thinking not only for persons who are
connected to informatics, but for every subject. Our
aim is to promote the postulate of Wing (2006) that
computational thinking is a fundamental skill for
everyone and our opinion is that the TTL is a
promising setting.
REFERENCES
Barr, V., Stephenson, C., 2011. Bringing computational
thinking to K-12: What is involved and what is the
role of the computer science education community?
ACM Inroads, 2 (1), 48–54.
Bell, T., Witten, I.H., Fellows, M., 2011. Computer
Science Unplugged. An enrichment and extension
programme for primary-aged children. Available on:
http://csunplugged.org/ (April 5, 2011).
Fields, D. A., Searle, K.A., Kafai, Y.B., Min, H.S., 2012.
Debuggens to assess student learning in e-textiles. In
Proceedings of the 43rd SIGCSE Technical Sympo-
sium on Computer Science Education. New York, NY:
ACM Press.
Flechsig, K.H., 1979. 5 Jahre Unterrichtswissenschaft.
Unterrichtswissenschaft, 7, 283-292.
Han Koh, K., Basawapatna, A., Bennett V., Repenning,
A., 2010. Towards the automatic recognition of
computational thinking for adaptive visual language
learning. In Proceedings of the 2010 Converence on
Visual Languages and Human Centric Computing
(VL/HCC 2010). Madrid, Spain: IEEE Computer.
Pallasch, W., Reimers, H., 1990. Pädagogische Werk-
stattarbeit. Weinheim: Juventa.
Repenning, A., 2015. Computational thinking in der
Lehrerbildung. Schriftenreihe 4, Hasler Stiftung.
Sabitzer, B.; Pasterk, S., 2015. Modeling: A Computer
Science Concept for General Education. In Procee-
dings of IEEE Conference Frontiers in Education,
October 2015. El Paso, Texas.
Werner, L., Denner, J., Campe, S., Kawamoto, D. C.,
2012. The Fairy performance assessment: Measuring
computational thinking in middle school. In
Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium
on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE ’12). New
York, NY: ACM.
Wing, J. M., 2006. Computational Thinking. Communi-
cations of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35.
Wing, J. M, 2008. Computational thinking and thinking
about computing. Philosophical Transactions of the
Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical
and Engineering Sciences, 366(1881), 3717–3725.
doi: 10.1098/rsta.2008.0118.
Wing, J. M., 2016. Posted by Microsoft Research Blog.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/
computational-thinking-10-years-later/.
Yadav, A., Good, J., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., 2017. Compu-
tational Thinking as an Emerging Competence
Domain. In: M. Mulder (ed.), Competence-based
Vocational and Professional Education and Training:
Issues, Concers and Prospects 23, pp. 1051-1067,
chapter 49. DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_49.
CSEDU 2017 - 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education
170