Using Radio Frequency Identification Technology to Track
Individual Wine Bottles
Isabel Expósito, Iñigo Cuiñas and Paula Gómez
Dept. Teoría do Sinal e Comunicacións, Universidade de Vigo, r. Maxwell, s/n 36310 Vigo, Spain
Keywords: Radio Frequency Identification, Wine Traceability, Bottle Tracking, Tag Readability.
Abstract: Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology has been tested and it is now proposed to be used in
applications as food traceability, instead of the traditional barcode, as that could get advantages of its
inherent characteristics: automatic management and distance readability. Among food industries, wine
production represents an added value sector and so it would be a target to implement RFID. Wine bottles
present some problems to the radio propagation, as liquids are not electromagnetically friend materials.
Thus, a large radio electric measurement campaign has been performed in order to deal with the possible
mismatches in using this technology to trace wine bottles from the wine cellars to the final consumer. The
performance of different RFID tag models, as well as the effect of the wine content within the bottle, is
analysed along the paper, trying to identify the better technological solution. The tests indicate that the use
of RFID methods would be suitable to allow the consumer to obtain complete traceability information from
each wine bottle, and the producer to track its products. The proposal opens the door to new possibilities in
the relationship between consumer and producer, by demonstrating the possibility of using a new
technology in a traditional market.
1 INTRODUCTION
Some years ago, wine consumers hardly taste
products far away their own country, and even their
own region. In such circumstances, people were
confident of the product they bought. Perhaps they
personally met the producers, or some people
working at any production stage that could
significantly inform about the quality of the wine
they purchased. However, nowadays the market is
far from being local, and it has become global. This
fact is, indeed, an advantage. Thousands of different
wines are available at most of the markets in the
World, both traditional or on line. But that carries a
lack in the confidence, which only could be solved
by traceability technique proposals. Now, most of
the food industries have implemented traceability
procedures that assure the quality at the different
business steps. But the consumer hardly receives
such information. He only has access to the short
data on the label: the name of the wine, some origin
information, perhaps grape varietals, and sometimes
other nutritional figures.
The use of radio frequency identification (RFID)
technologies combined with transnational data bases
and, possibly, web services would be a technical
solution to both troubles; to allow a complete
traceability from producer to consumer, known as
“from farm to fork”, but also to make this
information available for the consumer. The final
proposal is to provide each bottle with a RFID tag
that univocally identifies it, and to use this tag to
trace the bottle from the winery to the consumer,
passing through the storage stage, transportation,
distribution, shopping,… controlling at each moment
its location and conservation conditions. A summary
of this information could be available for the
consumer by reading the RFID tag with his
smartphone and accessing the web service to read
the data in the own phone. This futuristic scenario is
technologically possible, as tested by European
Project RFID-F2F (RFID-F2F web page, 2011)
(Cuiñas et al., 2011); (Catarinucci et al., 2011), but
some electromagnetic restrictions could limit the
extension of the application.
The RFID technology (ISO/IEC 18000) is now
mature for large developments. The basic idea of
such systems could be paralleled to the bar codes.
Each product to be traced must be identified by a
RFID tag, which aspect is like a label that could
271
Expósito I., Cuiñas I. and Gómez P..
Using Radio Frequency Identification Technology to Track Individual Wine Bottles.
DOI: 10.5220/0004049902710276
In Proceedings of the International Conference on Signal Processing and Multimedia Applications and Wireless Information Networks and Systems
(WINSYS-2012), pages 271-276
ISBN: 978-989-8565-25-9
Copyright
c
2012 SCITEPRESS (Science and Technology Publications, Lda.)
even be printed but it also contains a small electronic
circuit. The bar code reader would be replaced by a
RFID interrogator, which transmits radio frequency
signals that the tags identify as questions. Once a tag
receives a question, it transmits the identification
information it has previously recorded. The tags do
not need to be supplied by external power sources,
as they harvest the energy received with the question
to generate the transmitted answer.
However, there are some limitations that are
inherent to the radio propagation characteristics. The
liquids and metallic elements are not friend materials
for electromagnetic fields radiation (Zhang et al.,
2009); (Hasar, 2009); (Wang and Afsar, 2003). This
unfriendly environment represents a constraint in the
extension of RFID and other electromagnetism-
based technologies. In fact, the aim of this paper is
to analyse the use of RFID in tracking wine bottles,
and to study the technical viability of such
application, trying to overpass the constraints
induced by the elements we are managing.
UHF technology has been preferred to HF in
order to develop a RFID system EPCglobal
compliant. In addition recent works reveal that
passive UHF RFID systems provide many
advantages over HF ones (Uysal et al., 2008).
Something which affects the wine supply chain in
particular is the fact that some steps require far field
interrogation, where HF tags cannot be used as they
do not work properly (Cuiñas et al., 2011).
At item-level tagging, several UHF RFID
solutions have been proposed, some of them based
in the use of general purpose UHF far field (FF) tags
and other in near field (NF) ones (Catarinucci et al.,
2010). UHF NF RFID technology is used when
materials containing liquids and metals are involved,
as they allow mitigating performance degradation
due to the absorbance of RF energy. However, it
could be not suitable in steps where the distance
between the RFID tag and the antenna is large or
several RFID tags must be read simultaneously (De
Blasi et al, 2009). Moreover, recent experimental
studies have shown that FF passive UHF RFID tags
are able to provide higher performance in critical
conditions than NF ones also in an item-level
traceability system when using NF RFID antennas
(De Blasi et al., 2009) (Catarinucci et al., 2010).
In our approach we decided to use FF UHF
RFID tags. The intention is to find a tag that could
be used in the whole supply chain. Thus, a large
experimental research has been done.
2 TEST SET AND PROCEDURE
The study of the viability of the bottle tracking
system is proposed to be done by means of a large
experimental measurement campaign. The
description of the experiments is the objective of this
section.
2.1 Equipment and Materials
The main equipment used was a RFID interrogator
model ALR 9900 from Alien Corporation (Alien,
2012a). Although various researchers have proposed
specific antenna designs for readers (Fan et al.,
2007); (Mahmoud, 2010), the authors decided to
provide their reader with a cush-craft antenna Alien
ALR-8611-AC (Alien, 2009), as the equipment
would be directly implemented. The
transmitter/receiver system operates in the UHF
band, at 866 MHz.
During the tests, up to eight tag models were
involved, each one at a time, to avoid interference
problems (Lazaro et al., 2009). The objective was to
determine the design that best adapts the
electromagnetic behaviour of the bottle. This model
would be proposed as the most effective for the
application. The tested tags were manufactured by
UPM (UPM, 2010a); (UPM, 2010b); (UMP, 2010c);
(UPM 2008); or by Alien Corporation (Alien,
2012b); (Alien, 2012c); (Alien, 2012d); (Alien,
2012e) and their shapes are represented in figures 1
and 2, respectively.
Figure 1: RFID tags manufactured by UPM.
The tags were attached to the bottle with vertical
orientation in order to minimize performance loss
due to antenna curving. As we try to provide
information about a traceability system with massive
application, it would be out of scope the needing of a
WINSYS 2012 - International Conference on Wireless Information Networks and Systems
272
particular RFID tag design, as the individual cost of
these advanced models is unaffordable for wine
producers.
Figure 2: RFID tags manufactured by Alien Corporation.
The object to be tracked is, of course, also
important. And the variety of wine bottle designs,
with slight differences among them, is really large.
So, we have used four different 75 cl wine bottles.
And we tested two red wine bottles and two white
wines, all produced at well-known Spanish
denominations of origin. The bottles were labelled
from 1 to 4, and their dimensions are summarized in
table 1. All of them are Bordeaux shape design,
except number 1 that is like Burgundy shape.
Table 1: Bottle dimensions.
bottle
wine
complete bottle
neck
height
(cm)
base
diameter
(cm)
diameter
(cm)
1
white
30.0
8.3
2.8
2
red
30.0
7.5
3.0
3
white
32.0
7.3
2.9
4
red
31.5
7.4
2.9
2.2 Procedure
The measurement campaign has been conducted
inside an anechoic chamber. Thus, when the RFID
interrogator reads the tag on the bottle, the received
signal comes surely from the tag, and not from
outside or after reflections on the room limits. Such
a facility guarantees the validity of the presented
results.
Each tagged bottle was placed in a fixed location
in the centre of the chamber, on a metallic platform,
as it would be placed in most of the industrial
processes. The RFID antenna, connected to the
interrogator, was moved around the bottle axis,
following a circular path. The distance from the
antenna to the rotation axis was 60 cm, and the
antenna was pointed to the bottle with an inclination
of 19º with respect to the vertical, to maintain the
main lobe of the antenna pointed to the tag. The
antenna displacement covered a 360 degree arc,
stopping each 1 degree, and asking the tag at each
stop. At each stop, the answer signal received from
the RFID tag on the bottle was analysed, checking if
an actual signal was received and, if so, the received
signal strength indicator (RSSI) was recorded. So,
we can determine the angles from which the tag
could be read, but also the quality of the radio link.
This procedure was applied to the four full
bottles, labelled successively with the different tags.
Besides that, the readability around similar shaped
empty bottles was tested, to be used as a reference
for the full bottles.
3 RESULTS
The outcomes of each 360 degree sweep around
each bottle can be combined into an individual chart,
in polar coordinates, representing what we called
readability pattern. Such graphs characterize the
received signal strength observed from any of the
360 antenna angular locations. These received signal
strength values have been normalized to the
maximum received signal strength. There could be
some observation angles with no received power,
which means that it was not possible to obtain a
response from the RFID tag on the bottle when the
interrogator is pointed at those angles. An example
is showed in figure 3, where the readability patterns
around bottles are presented, by using the Alien G
model RFID tag on each bottle. The larger
readability capabilities are obtained when testing
empty bottles, number 1 (Burgundy shape) and
number 2 (Bordeaux). These are going to be used as
reference for full bottles number 1 (the Burgundy
one), and numbers 2 to 4 (the Bordeaux ones),
respectively. When the tested bottles are full, the arc
at which is possible to obtain a response is reduced
considerably, as could be observed in the figure 5.
This fact will be the most limitative situation if a
RFID-based traceability system must be installed to
track wine bottles in a store, during delivery, or at
the shop. Besides, the shape of the readability
pattern appears to be strongly modified when the
bottle is full of wine, which is obviously the status
we are interested in when tracking and traceability
systems are under deployment. These changes result
in huge differences in terms of readability,
Using Radio Frequency Identification Technology to Track Individual Wine Bottles
273
depending on the angle at which the tag is
interrogated. These effects are observed at figure 5
for one model of tag (Alien G), but they are general
trends using different tag models, but also gluing the
tag to different locations on the bottle surface.
Figure 3: Normalised RSSI, using Alien model G tags,
around the four bottles.
Figure 4: Normalised RSSI, using UPM tags, around the
bottle number 2.
Figure 4 shows the readability patterns around a
Bordeaux type bottle (the labelled as number 2),
by using different RFID tag models. At the graphs,
the dependence on the RFID tag design appears to
be very strong, both in terms of shape and of
received signal strength as could be tested by
observing the scale of magnitudes. The power
transmitted by the tags is important to be
interrogated, of course, but the angular arc at which
a response is received is probably the crucial factor:
weak responses could be amplified or received with
more sensitive equipment, but silences have no
technical solutions. This means that the arc of
observation may be the key parameter to determine
the best tag model for the specific application. Table
2a-b contains the values of the readability arcs, i.e.
the angular arcs at which the RFID interrogator
receives a response from the tag on the bottle.
Table 2: Readability arcs in degree; with tags: (a) UPM;
(b) Alien.
bottles
UPM RFID tags
dogbone
short
d.
hammer
web,
H
web,
V
1
304
120
125
199
99
2
295
280
231
96
96
3
309
268
251
199
112
4
292
265
202
105
122
(a)
bottles
RFID Alien tags
squiggle
2x2
G
short
1
260
217
301
312
2
262
185
360
278
3
270
211
327
299
4
272
164
329
307
(b)
The first immediate observation on the results is
related to the shape of the readability pattern:
whereas the interrogation around an empty bottle
always obtains an answer from the RFID tag, this
changes when the bottle is full of wine. The
presence of wine, and probably any other liquid,
inside the bottle induces a strong modification in the
capability of exciting the circuits at the RFID tag
and, so, in the possibility of getting a response. It is
well known that liquids in general are not friendly
materials for radio electric wave propagation (Zhang
et al., 2009), and the results confirm this
asseveration, as could be detected in figures 3 and,
and in table 2. The measurements around empty
bottles indicate that it is possible to read the tag
independently of the interrogation angle. However,
when testing full bottles, the readable arc is reduced,
sometimes to less than 100 degree. Besides, the
RSSI values around empty bottles are always larger
than at full bottles.
The effect of gluing the tag on the bottle at
different heights is also interesting. The experiment,
this time, consisted in repeating the circular
movement of the antenna interrogating the tag when
this was glued on the bottle at different heights from
the bottom. The distance from the tag to the bottle
WINSYS 2012 - International Conference on Wireless Information Networks and Systems
274
bottom was measured from the centre of the tag,
which allows the comparison among different tag
models. Observing the results, it appears that
increasing the distance to the bottle bottom implies a
reduction in the received signal strength from the
tag, whereas the pattern maintains its shape. In
nearly all the cases the largest reading arc seems to
be obtained in the tag positions nearest to the bottom
of the bottle (between 7 and 8.5cm).
Table 3: Best tag position regarding reading arc; with tags:
(a) Alien G; (b) Alien Squiggle.
bottle
wine
ALIEN G tag
Best position
of tag’s centre
(cm)
Arc
width
(º)
Maximum
RSSI (a.u.)
1
white
8.5
314
10087
2
red
7 or 7.5
360
10497
3
white
8.5
345
9337.3
4
red
7.5
333
9849.8
(a)
bottle
wine
ALIEN Squiggle tag
Best position
of tag’s centre
(cm)
Arc
width
(º)
Maximum
RSSI (a.u.)
1
white
7
160
1262.5
2
red
8.5
247
1458.4
3
white
11.5
196
1298.5
4
red
7
246
1647.7
(b)
The results appear to show that the location of
the tags has low influence on the shape of the
readability pattern but it has large weight on the
power emitted by the RFID tag, and even in the
angles at which the tag is possible to be read. In
terms of reading arc the positions nearest to the
bottom of the bottle seem to be more convenient (see
table 3). At these tables, the maximum RSSI is
measured in arbitrary units, which represents the
value given by the handheld reader after
interrogating the tag. The success in selecting the
satisfactory location will lead to better performance
in the interrogation capacity.
The previously commented results will be useful
to select the most adequate tag model and bottle
location when implementing a RFID-based
traceability and tracking system for wine bottles as
proposed in RFID-F2F project. The use of such FF
tags would allow the control of bottle storage, and
combining with temperature sensors it would also
improve the conservation conditions tracking along
the distribution stage.
4 CONCLUSIONS
This paper presents a system to trace and track wine
bottles by means of radiofrequency techniques,
using the so-called RFID technology. Previously to
the implementation of such a system, some
experiments have been performed around different
wine bottles, by means of a complete collection of
commercial RFID tags. Up to four different bottles
and up to eight RFID tag models have been involved
in a large electromagnetic measurement campaign.
The results presented along the paper indicates
that the performance of the tracking system, in terms
of its capacity of effectively detect the RFID tags on
the bottles, depends on several factors, as the own
design of the tag, the location of the tag on the bottle
side, and the bottle shape.
Depending on the design of the tag, there are tags
that are able to be read from many angles of
observation, whereas there are others with small
visibility arcs. In any case, when the bottle is empty,
they could be read from all around, which means
that the presence of the wine affects in a different
way as a function of the design of the tag. Thus, a
good selection of tag design would be a key factor to
the success of the system.
Depending on the location of the tag on the
bottle side, the received signal strength at the RFID
interrogator varies and also the arc at with the
reading is possible, although the shape of the
readability pattern appears to be approximately the
same. This means that a precise selection of the
location would lead to better readability
performance of the system.
Although the measurements have been done in
controlled environments, the results are promising.
They seem to show that the proposed system could
be successfully implemented in actual wineries and
stores, being used to trace and track the bottles, as
well as in markets where final consumers could
access the data related to the product, increasing
their confidence on its process and quality.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work has been supported by the European
Commission (CIP-Pilot Actions), under the project
“RFID from Farm to Fork”, grant agreement number
250444.
Authors would like to thank Ms Eva Sotos for
her help during the measurement campaigns.
Using Radio Frequency Identification Technology to Track Individual Wine Bottles
275
REFERENCES
Alien Technology Corp., ALR-9900+EMA, Enterprise
RFID Reader, 2012. Alien Technology, 18220
Butterfield Blvd., Morgan Hill CA 95037 USA.
Alien Technology Corp., ALN-9640 Squiggle Inlay, 2012.
Alien Technology, 18220 Butterfield Blvd., Morgan
Hill CA 95037 USA.
Alien Technology Corp., ALN-9662 Short Inlay, 2012
Alien Technology, 18220 Butterfield Blvd., Morgan
Hill CA 95037 USA.
Alien Technology Corp., ALN-9634 2x2 Inlay, 2012.
Alien Technology, 18220 Butterfield Blvd., Morgan
Hill CA 95037 USA.
Alien Technology Corp., ALN-9654 G Inlay, 2012. Alien
Technology, 18220 Butterfield Blvd., Morgan Hill CA
95037 USA.
Alien Technology Corp., ALR-8611-C, High Performance
RFID Antenna, 2009. Alien Technology, 18220
Butterfield Blvd., Morgan Hill CA 95037 USA.
Catarinucci L., Cuiñas I., Expósito I., Colella R., Gay-
Fernández J.A., Tarricone L., “RFID and WSNs for
traceability of agricultural goods from farm to fork:
electromagnetic and deployment aspects on wine test-
cases”, Proceedings of the 19th International
Conference on Software, Telecommunications and
Computer Networks, SoftCOM 2011, Split (Croatia),
2011.
Catarinucci L., Colella R., De Blasi M., Patrono L.,
Tarricone L., “Improving item-level tracing systems
through ad hoc UHF RFID tags”, Proceedings of the
IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium (RWS’2010), pp.
160163, New Orleans (USA), 2010.
Cuiñas I., Catarinucci L., Trebar M., “RFID from Farm to
Fork: traceability along the complete food chain”,
Progress In Electromagnetic Research Symposium,
PIERS 2011, Marrakesh (Morocco), 2011.
De Blasi M., Mighali V., Patrono L., Stefanizzi M. L.,
“Performance Evaluation of UHF RFID tags in the
Pharmaceutical Supply Chain”, Proceedings of 20th
Tyrrhenian International Workshop on Digital
Communications, Pula (Italy), 2009.
Fan Z. G., Qiao S., Huangfu J. T., Ran L. X., “A
miniaturized printed dipole antenna with V-shaped
ground for 2.45 Ghz RFID readers”, PIER, vol. 71, pp.
149-158, 2007.
Hasar U. C., “Thickness-independent automated
constitutive parameters extraction of thin solid and
liquid materials from waveguide measurements”,
Progress In Electromagnetics Research, PIER, vol.
92, pp. 17-32, 2009.
ISO/IEC 18000Information Technology AIDC
Techniques RFID for Item Management Air
Interface , 18000-6 Part 6 Parameters for Air
Interface Communications at 860 to 960 MHz, 2008.
Lazaro A., Girbau D., Villarino R., Effects of
Interferences in UHF RFID Systems”, Progress In
Electromagnetics Research, PIER, vol. 98, pp. 425-
443, 2009.
Mahmoud K. R., “Design optimization of a bow-tie
antenna for 2.45Ghz RFID readers using a hybrid
BSO-NM algorithm”, Progress In Electromagnetics
Research, PIER, vol. 100, pp. 105-117, 2010.
RFID-F2F (RFID from Farm to Fork) project web page,
http://www.rfid-f2f.eu/.
UPM Raflatac, UPM Raflatac Dogbone, 05/2010 ENG
X006/3, 2010. UPM RFID, Myllyhaantie 6 C, 33960
Pirkkala, Finland.
UPM Raflatac, UPM Raflatac Shortdipolex, 05/2010 ENG
X003/3, 2010. UPM RFID, Myllyhaantie 6 C, 33960
Pirkkala, Finland.
UPM Raflatac, UPM Raflatac Webx, 05/2010 ENG
X002/2, 2010. UPM RFID, Myllyhaantie 6 C, 33960
Pirkkala, Finland.
UPM Raflatac, UPM Raflatac Hammer, 04/2008 ENG
X001, 2008. UPM RFID, Myllyhaantie 6 C, 33960
Pirkkala, Finland.
Uysal, D. D., Emond, J.-P., Engels, D. W., “Evaluation of
RFID Performance for a Pharmaceutical Distribution
Chain: HF vs. UHF”, Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE
International Conference on RFID, Las Vegas (USA),
2008.
Wang Y., Afsar M. N., “Measurement of complex
permittivity of liquids using waveguide techniques”,
Progress In Electromagnetics Research, PIER, vol.
42, pp. 131-142, 2003
Zhang Y., Yemelyanov K., Li X., Amin M. G., “Effect of
metallic objects and liquid supplies on RFID links”,
Proceedings of the IEEE Antennas and Propagation
Society International Symposium, IEEE AP-S 2009,
Charleston (USA), 2009.
WINSYS 2012 - International Conference on Wireless Information Networks and Systems
276