loading
Papers Papers/2022 Papers Papers/2022

Research.Publish.Connect.

Paper

Paper Unlock

Authors: Natália C. Silva ; César A. L. de Oliveira ; Fabiane A. L. A. Albino and Ricardo M. F. Lima

Affiliation: Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil

Keyword(s): Flexible Business Processes, Controlled Software Experiment, Comparative Study, Declarative Languages.

Related Ontology Subjects/Areas/Topics: Enterprise Information Systems ; Information Systems Analysis and Specification ; Software Engineering

Abstract: It has been argued that traditional workflows lack of flexibility to cope with complex and changing environments found in several business domains. The declarative approach surged with the aim of enabling more flexible business process management systems. Processes are designed in terms of activities and rules that constrain their execution. As such, declarative models are less rigid and prescriptive than workflows, since this approach focus on modeling what must be done but not how. Despite these arguments, there is no quantitative evidence that the benefits provided by current declarative approaches outperform the features of traditional workflows. In this work, we present the results of a controlled experiment conducted to empirically compare Workflow and Declarative approaches to business process modeling. Our findings suggest that there is no signficative difference from adopting one approach or the other.

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Sign In Guest: Register as new SciTePress user now for free.

Sign In SciTePress user: please login.

PDF ImageMy Papers

You are not signed in, therefore limits apply to your IP address 3.143.168.172

In the current month:
Recent papers: 100 available of 100 total
2+ years older papers: 200 available of 200 total

Paper citation in several formats:
C. Silva, N.; A. L. de Oliveira, C.; A. L. A. Albino, F. and M. F. Lima, R. (2014). Declarative Versus Imperative Business Process Languages - A Controlled Experiment. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS; ISBN 978-989-758-029-1; ISSN 2184-4992, SciTePress, pages 394-401. DOI: 10.5220/0004896203940401

@conference{iceis14,
author={Natália {C. Silva}. and César {A. L. de Oliveira}. and Fabiane {A. L. A. Albino}. and Ricardo {M. F. Lima}.},
title={Declarative Versus Imperative Business Process Languages - A Controlled Experiment},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS},
year={2014},
pages={394-401},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0004896203940401},
isbn={978-989-758-029-1},
issn={2184-4992},
}

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 2: ICEIS
TI - Declarative Versus Imperative Business Process Languages - A Controlled Experiment
SN - 978-989-758-029-1
IS - 2184-4992
AU - C. Silva, N.
AU - A. L. de Oliveira, C.
AU - A. L. A. Albino, F.
AU - M. F. Lima, R.
PY - 2014
SP - 394
EP - 401
DO - 10.5220/0004896203940401
PB - SciTePress

- Science and Technology Publications, Lda.
RESOURCES

Proceedings

Papers

Authors

Ontology

CONTACTS

Science and Technology Publications, Lda
Avenida de S. Francisco Xavier, Lote 7 Cv. C,
2900-616 Setúbal, Portugal.

Phone: +351 265 520 185 (National fixed network call)
Fax: +351 265 520 186
Email: info@scitepress.org

EXTERNAL LINKS

PRIMORIS

INSTICC

SCITEVENTS

CROSSREF

PROCEEDINGS SUBMITTED FOR INDEXATION BY:

dblp

Ei Compendex

SCOPUS

Semantic Scholar

Google Scholar

Microsoft Academic