Jupyter Notebook as the Physics Experimental Laboratory's Logbook - First Approach

Irene Urcelay-Olabarria, Ruth Lazkoz, Jon Urrestilla, Aritz Leonardo, Josu M. Igartua

Abstract

In the Physics Degree it is of fundamental importance to practice in an Experimental Laboratory. The standard Laboratory Sessions consist of two main parts: data handling and data processing. The session should also have a prologue, where students get to know the underlaying theory of the practical session and an epilogue, where students present the results obtained and the difficulties encountered. The prologue and the epilogue naturally decouple from the work in the laboratory. Data processing, in most cases, is effectively decoupled from the work in the laboratory, as well. In this short paper we present a tool, the Jupyter Notebook, an electronic laboratory logbook, which conveniently facilitates the decoupling of the data handling and processing, but which merges almost completely into an electronic notebook the four parts of the laboratory practical session: theory, data, processing and presentation. But, interestingly, the notebook goes beyond that: it allows the students to explore the data in an interactive way (simulating variants), to acquire a deeper knowledge of the data (by digitally altering the experiment or simulating new ones), to propose new experiments, etcetera. We strongly believe that this tool can also motivate the students: the results are obtained interactively, immediately, visually, and they can be shared and even improved. Moreover, the laboratory sessions get optimized: simulations make the sessions be focused on obtaining data and in its variants.

References

  1. Bernhard, J. (2003). Physics learning and microcomputer based laboratory (mbl): Learning effects of using mbl as a technological and as a cognitive tool, science education research in the knowledge based society. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 313-321.
  2. Collins, L. A., Morrison, M. A., and Donoho, P. L. (1974). Advanced undergraduate-laboratory experiment on electron spin resonance in single-crystal ruby. American Journal of Physics 42, 560 (1974).
  3. Damyanov, D. S., Pavlova, I. N., Ilieva, S. I., Gourev, V. N., Yordanov, V. G., and Mishonov, T. M. (2015). Planck's constant measurement by landauer quantization for student laboratories. European Journal of Physics, Volume 36, Issue 5, article id. 055047.
  4. Dounas-Frazer, D. and Lewandowski, H. (2016). Nothing works the first time: An expert experimental physics epistemology. ArXiv e-prints.
  5. Eshach, H. and Kukliansky, I. (2016). Developing of an instrument for assessing students? data analysis skills in the undergraduate physics laboratory. Canadian Journal of Physics, 94(11):1205-1215.
  6. Harms, U. (2003). Virtual and remote labs in physics education. Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Physics Teaching in Engineering Education, 14-17 June (Budapest).
  7. Hmurcik, L., Slacik, A., Miller, H., and Samoncik, S. (1989). Linear regresion analysis in a first physics lab. Journal of Physics 57, 135 (1989).
  8. Jupyter (2017). The jupyter notebook. http://jupyternotebook.readthedocs.io/en/latest/notebook.html.
  9. Orear, J. (1991). Comment on “linear regression analysis in a first physics lab,” by l. hmurcik et al. American Journal of Physics 59(1):87-88.
  10. Ricci, M. M., Mazzaferri, J., Bragas, A., and Martinez, O. (2007). Photon counting statistics using a digital oscilloscope. Am. J. Phys. 75(8), pp. 707-712.
  11. Sassi, E. (2001). Lab-work in physics education and informatic tools: advantages and problems. pinto, r. & surinach, s. (eds), physics teacher education beyond, 57- 64. elsevier, paris. Pinto, R. & Surinach, S. (Eds), Physics Teacher Education Beyond, 57- 64. Elsevier, Paris.
  12. Stanley, J. T. and Lewandowski, H. J. (2016). Recommendations for the use of notebooks in upper-division physics lab courses. ArXiv e-prints.
  13. Vicentini, E. S. E. . M. (2008). Aims and strategies of laboratory work. M. Vicentini, & E. Sassi, Connecting Research in Physics Education with Teacher Education (pp. 1-12). International Commision on Physics Education.
  14. Wilcox, B. R. and Lewandowski, H. J. (2016). Openended versus guided laboratory activities:impact on students' beliefs about experimental physics. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., 12:020132.
  15. Wilcox, B. R. and Lewandowski, H. J. (2017). Students' views about the nature of experimental physics (article). under review Phys. Rev. X.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Urcelay-Olabarria I., Lazkoz R., Urrestilla J., Leonardo A. and Igartua J. (2017). Jupyter Notebook as the Physics Experimental Laboratory's Logbook - First Approach . In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-239-4, pages 458-463. DOI: 10.5220/0006352104580463


in Bibtex Style

@conference{csedu17,
author={Irene Urcelay-Olabarria and Ruth Lazkoz and Jon Urrestilla and Aritz Leonardo and Josu M. Igartua},
title={Jupyter Notebook as the Physics Experimental Laboratory's Logbook - First Approach},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,},
year={2017},
pages={458-463},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0006352104580463},
isbn={978-989-758-239-4},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 1: CSEDU,
TI - Jupyter Notebook as the Physics Experimental Laboratory's Logbook - First Approach
SN - 978-989-758-239-4
AU - Urcelay-Olabarria I.
AU - Lazkoz R.
AU - Urrestilla J.
AU - Leonardo A.
AU - Igartua J.
PY - 2017
SP - 458
EP - 463
DO - 10.5220/0006352104580463