Helpful but Spooky? Acceptance of AAL-systems Contrasting User Groups with Focus on Disabilities and Care Needs

Julia van Heek, Simon Himmel, Martina Ziefle

Abstract

Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) technologies present one approach facing the challenges of recent and rising care needs due to demographic changes in western societies. Beside the technological implementation, the focus on user acceptance of all stakeholders plays a major role for a successful rollout. As most research deals with age-related issues, this paper emphasizes especially on the sector of disabled persons. In a qualitative interview pre-study (n=9) and a validating questionnaire study (n=279) the perceived benefits and barriers of AAL technologies were contrasted in four user groups: healthy “not-experienced” people, disabled, their relatives, and professional care givers. Results indicate that disabled and care-needy people show a higher acceptance and intention to use an AAL system than “not-experienced” people or care givers and that the motives for use and non-use differ strongly with regard to user diversity as well. The results show the importance to integrate diverse user groups (age, disabilities) into the design and evaluation process of AAL technologies.

References

  1. Baig, M. M., Gholamhosseini, H. (2013). Smart Health Monitoring Systems: An Overview of Design and Modeling. J Med Syst., 37(2), 1-14.
  2. Beringer, R., Sixsmith, A., Campo, M., Brown, J., McCloskey, R. (2011). The “acceptance” of ambient assisted living: Developing an alternate methodology to this limited research lens. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics, Toward useful services for elderly and people with disabilities. Springer, pp. 161-167.
  3. Bloom, D. E., & Canning, D. (2004). Global Demographic Change: Dimensions and Economic Significance National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. 10817.
  4. Brauner, P., Holzinger, A., Ziefle, M. (2015). Ubiquitous computing at its best: serious exercise games for older adults in ambient assisted living environments-a technology acceptance perspective. EAI Endorsed Trans. Serious Games, 15, 1-12.
  5. Cheng, J., Chen, X., Shen, M. (2013). A Framework for Daily Activity Monitoring and Fall Detection Based on Surface Electromyography and Accelerometer Signals. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform., 17(1), 38-45.
  6. Demiris, G., Hensel, B. K., Skubic, M., Rantz, M. (2008). Senior residents' perceived need of and preferences for “smart home” sensor technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 24(1), 120-124.
  7. Demiris, G., Rantz, M., Aud, M., Marek, K., Tyrer, H., Skubic, M., & Hussam, A. (2004). Older adults' attitudes towards and perceptions of “smart home” technologies: a pilot study. Med Inform Internet, 29(2), 87-94.
  8. EarlySense. (2016). Homepage: EarlySense All-in-One System. Retrieved from http://www.earlysense.com/ Essence. (2016). Homepage: Smart Care - Care@ Home Product Suite. Retrieved from http://www.essencegrp.com/smart-care/care-at-home-pers.
  9. Fuchsberger, V. (2008). Ambient assisted living: elderly people's needs and how to face them. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM international workshop on Semantic ambient media experiences, ACM, pp. 21-24.
  10. Geenen, S. J., Powers, L. E., Sells, W. (2003). Understanding the Role of Health Care Providers During the Transition of Adolescents With Disabilities and Special Health Care Needs. J Adolesc Health, 32(3), 225- 233.
  11. Gentry, T. (2009). Smart homes for people with neurological disability: State of the art. NeuroRehabilitation, 25(3), 209-217.
  12. Gövercin, M., Meyer, S., Schellenbach, M., SteinhagenThiessen, E., Weiss, B., Haesner, M. (2016). SmartSenior@home: Acceptance of an integrated ambient assisted living system. Results of a clinical field trial in 35 households. Inform Health Soc Care, 1-18.
  13. Harris, J. (2010). The use, role and application of advanced technology in the lives of disabled people in the UK. Disabil Soc, 25(4), 427-439.
  14. Himmel, S., Ziefle, M. (2016). Smart Home Medical Technologies: Users' Requirements for Conditional Acceptance. I-Com, 15(1).
  15. Himmel, S., Ziefle, M., Lidynia, C., & Holzinger, A. (2013). Older Users' Wish List for Technology Attributes. In A. Cuzzocrea, C. Kittl, D. E. Simos, E. Weippl, L. Xu (Eds.), Availability, Reliability, & Security in Information Systems and HCI, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 16-27.
  16. Klack, L., Ziefle, M., Wilkowska, W., Kluge, J. (2013). Telemedical versus conventional heart patient monitoring: a survey study with German physicians. Int J Technol. Assess Health Care, 29(4), 378-383.
  17. Kleinberger, T., Becker, M., Ras, E., Holzinger, A., Müller, P. (2007). Ambient Intelligence in Assisted Living: Enable Elderly People to Handle Future Interfaces. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Ambient Interaction, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 103-112.
  18. Kowalewski, S., Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M. (2012). Accounting for user diversity in the acceptance of medical assistive technologies. In Electronic Healthcare, Springer, pp. 175-183.
  19. Larizza, M. F., Zukerman, I., Bohnert, F., Busija, L., Bentley, S. A., Russell, R. A., Rees, G. (2014). Inhome monitoring of older adults with vision impairment: exploring patients', caregivers' and professionals' views. J American Medical Informatics Association, 21(1), 56-63.
  20. López, S. A., Corno, F., Russis, L. D. (2015). Supporting caregivers in assisted living facilities for persons with disabilities: a user study. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(1), 133-144.
  21. Mortenson, W. B., Demers, L., Fuhrer, M. J., Jutai, J. W., Lenker, J., DeRuyter, F. (2013). Effects of an assistive technology intervention on older adults with disabilities and their informal caregivers: an exploratory randomized controlled trial. American J of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation/Assoc of Academic Physiatrists, 92(4), 297-306.
  22. Poore, C. (2007). Disability in Twentieth-century German Culture. University of Michigan Press.
  23. Rashidi, P., Mihailidis, A. (2013). A Survey on AmbientAssisted Living Tools for Older Adults. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform, 17(3), 579-590.
  24. Roger, V. L., Go, A. S., Lloyd-Jones, D. M., Adams, R. J., Berry, J. D., Brown, T. M., et al. (2011). American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 123(4), e18-e209.
  25. Ruyter, B. de, & Pelgrim, E. (2007). Ambient Assistedliving Research in Carelab. Interactions, 14(4), 30-33.
  26. Schmitt, J. M. (2002). Innovative medical technologies help ensure improved patient care and costeffectiveness. J Med Mark: Device, Diagnostic and Pharmaceutical Marketing, 2(2), 174-178.
  27. Shaw, J. E., Sicree, R. A. Zimmet, P. Z. (2010). Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 87(1), 4-14.
  28. Silverstone, R., Morley, D., Dahlberg, A., & Livingstone, S. (1989). Families, technologies and consumption: the household information and communication technologies.
  29. Sixsmith, A., Meuller, S., Lull, F., Klein, M., Bierhoff, I., Delaney, S., Savage, R. (2009). SOPRANO - An Ambient Assisted Living System for Supporting Older People at Home. In M. Mokhtari, I. Khalil, J. Bauchet, D. Zhang, & C. Nugent (Eds.), Ambient Assistive Health and Wellness Management in the Heart of the City, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 233-236.
  30. Sun, H., De Florio, V., Gui, N., Blondia, C. (2010). The missing ones: Key ingredients towards effective ambient assisted living systems. J Ambient Intell Smart Environ, 2(2), 109-120.
  31. Tunstall. (2016). Homepage: Tunstall - Solutions for Healthcare Professionals. Retrieved from www.tunstall healthcare.com.au.
  32. Walker, A., Maltby, T. (2012). Active ageing: A strategic policy solution to demographic ageing in the European Union. Int J Social Welfare, 21, 117-130.
  33. Wild, S., Roglic, G., Green, A., Sicree, R., King, H. (2004). Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care, 27(5), 1047-1053.
  34. Wiles, J. L., Leibing, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J., Allen, R. E. S. (2011). The Meaning of “Ageing in Place” to Older People. The Gerontologist, gnr098.
  35. Wilkowska, W., Gaul, S., & Ziefle, M. (2010). A Small but Significant Difference-The Role of Gender on Acceptance of Medical Assistive Technologies. In: Symposium of the Austrian HCI and Usability Engineering Group, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 82-100.
  36. Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M., & Himmel, S. (2015). Perceptions of Personal Privacy in Smart Home Technologies: Do User Assessments Vary Depending on the Research Method? In Int Conference on Human Aspects of Information Security, Privacy, Trust, Springer, pp. 592-603.
  37. Wilkowska, W., Ziefle, M., Alagöz, F. (2012). How user diversity and country of origin impact the readiness to adopt E-health technologies: an intercultural comparison. Work (Reading, Mass.), 41 Suppl 1, 2072-2080.
  38. Ziefle, M., Himmel, S., Wilkowska, W. (2011). When Your Living Space Knows What You Do: Acceptance of Medical Home Monitoring by Different Technologies. In Information Quality in e-Health, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 607-624.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

van Heek J., Himmel S. and Ziefle M. (2017). Helpful but Spooky? Acceptance of AAL-systems Contrasting User Groups with Focus on Disabilities and Care Needs . In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health - Volume 1: ICT4AWE, ISBN 978-989-758-251-6, pages 78-90. DOI: 10.5220/0006325400780090


in Bibtex Style

@conference{ict4awe17,
author={Julia van Heek and Simon Himmel and Martina Ziefle},
title={Helpful but Spooky? Acceptance of AAL-systems Contrasting User Groups with Focus on Disabilities and Care Needs },
booktitle={Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health - Volume 1: ICT4AWE,},
year={2017},
pages={78-90},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0006325400780090},
isbn={978-989-758-251-6},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health - Volume 1: ICT4AWE,
TI - Helpful but Spooky? Acceptance of AAL-systems Contrasting User Groups with Focus on Disabilities and Care Needs
SN - 978-989-758-251-6
AU - van Heek J.
AU - Himmel S.
AU - Ziefle M.
PY - 2017
SP - 78
EP - 90
DO - 10.5220/0006325400780090