User Perceptions of Communicative and Task-competent Agents in a Virtual Basketball Game

Divesh Lala, Christian Nitschke, Toyoaki Nishida

2015

Abstract

In this paper, we describe a virtual basketball game where a human and an embodied agent can play together as a team. Our goal is to investigate whether the human prefers an agent who is highly competent at basketball or one which is not as competent but tries to actively communicate through body movements. The virtual basketball game was implemented using a Kinect to sense body movements and a pressure sensor for handsfree navigation. In order to create an agent who could react to a user’s body movements, we designed an agent model based on joint activity theory. We performed an experiment where participants would play virtual basketball with each agent and evaluated them through questionnaires. It was found that participants preferred the agent which tried to communicate more with the user, even though they could distinguish that the other agent was better at playing basketball. We propose that communication capability for these types of agents is crucial, even at the expense of some task ability.

References

  1. Bartneck, C., Kulic, D., Croft, E., and Zoghbi, S. (2009). Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1):71-81.
  2. Baur, T., Damian, I., Gebhard, P., Porayska-Pomsta, K., and André, E. (2013). A job interview simulation: Social cue-based interaction with a virtual character. In 2013 International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), pages 220-227. IEEE.
  3. Bergmann, K. and Macedonia, M. (2013). A virtual agent as vocabulary trainer: Iconic gestures help to improve learner's memory performance. In Aylett, R., Krenn, B., Pelachaud, C., and Shimodaira, H., editors, Intelligent Virtual Agents, volume 8108 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  4. Bevacqua, E., Prepin, K., Niewiadomski, R., de Sevin, E., and Pelachaud, C. (2010). Greta: Towards an interactive conversational virtual companion. Artificial Companions in Society: perspectives on the Present and Future, pages 1-17.
  5. Bianchi-Berthouze, N. (2013). Understanding the role of body movement in player engagement. HumanComputer Interaction, 28(1):40-75.
  6. Bickmore, T. W., Pfeifer, L. M., and Jack, B. W. (2009). Taking the time to care: Empowering low health literacy hospital patients with virtual nurse agents. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 7809, pages 1265- 1274. ACM.
  7. Bickmore, T. W., Vardoulakis, L. M. P., and Schulman, D. (2013). Tinker: a relational agent museum guide. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 27(2).
  8. Bradshaw, J. M., Feltovich, P. J., Johnson, M., Breedy, M. R., Bunch, L., Eskridge, T. C., Jung, H., Lott, J., Uszok, A., and van Diggelen, J. (2009). From tools to teammates: Joint activity in human-agentrobot teams. In Kurosu, M., editor, HCI (7810), volume 5619 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 935-944.
  9. Calinon, S., Guenter, F., and Billard, A. (2007). On Learning, Representing, and Generalizing a Task in a Humanoid Robot. Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part B, IEEE Transactions on, 37(2):286-298.
  10. Clark, H. H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge University Press.
  11. Damian, I., Buhling, R., Kistler, F., Billinghurst, M., Obaid, M., and Andre, E. (2013). Motion capturing empowered interaction with a virtual agent in an augmented reality environment. In 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, pages 1-6.
  12. de Gelder, B. (2009). Why bodies? Twelve reasons for including bodily expressions in affective neuroscience. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364:3475-3484.
  13. Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Spence, P. R., and Shelton, A. K. (2014). Is that a bot running the social media feed? testing the differences in perceptions of communication quality for a human agent and a bot agent on twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 33:372-376.
  14. Garau, M., Slater, M., Vinayagamoorthy, V., Brogni, A., Steed, A., and Sasse, M. A. (2003). The impact of avatar realism and eye gaze control on perceived quality of communication in a shared immersive virtual environment. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 7803, pages 529-536. ACM.
  15. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Basic Books, New York.
  16. Guy, S. J., Chhugani, J., Curtis, S., Dubey, P., Lin, M., and Manocha, D. (2010). PLEdestrians: A least-effort approach to crowd simulation. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, SCA 7810, pages 119-128.
  17. Kenny, P., Parsons, T. D., Gratch, J., and Rizzo, A. A. (2008). Evaluation of justina: a virtual patient with ptsd. In Intelligent virtual agents, pages 394-408. Springer.
  18. Kim, Y. and Baylor, A. L. (2006). Pedagogical agents as learning companions: The role of agent competency and type of interaction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(3):223-243.
  19. Kistler, F., André, E., Mascarenhas, S., Silva, A., Paiva, A., Degens, N., Hofstede, G. J., Krumhuber, E., Kappas, A., and Aylett, R. (2013). Traveller: An interactive cultural training system controlled by user-defined body gestures. In Human-Computer InteractionINTERACT 2013, pages 697-704. Springer.
  20. Kleinsmith, A. and Bianchi-Berthouze, N. (2013). Affective body expression perception and recognition: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, pages 1-20.
  21. Kopp, S., Jung, B., Leßmann, N., and Wachsmuth, I. (2003). Max - a multimodal assistant in virtual reality construction. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz, 4(03):11-17.
  22. Kruijff, G.-J. M., Janíce?k, M., and Zender, H. (2012). Situated communication for joint activity in human-robot teams. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27(2):27-35.
  23. Lala, D. (2012). VISIE: A spatially immersive environment for capturing and analyzing body expression in virtual worlds. Masters thesis, Kyoto University.
  24. Lala, D., Mohammad, Y., and Nishida, T. (2013). Unsupervised gesture recognition system for learning manipulative actions in virtual basketball. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction.
  25. Lala, D. and Nishida, T. (2014). A joint activity theory analysis of body interactions in multiplayer virtual basketball. In Proceedings of the 28th British HCI Conference.
  26. Little, D. Y. and Sommer, F. T. (2011). Learning in embodied action-perception loops through exploration. CoRR.
  27. Martin, J.-C., Niewiadomski, R., Devillers, L., Buisine, S., and Pelachaud, C. (2006). Multimodal complex emotions: Gesture expressivity and blended facial expressions. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics, 3(3):269-291.
  28. Nass, C., Steuer, J., and Tauber, E. R. (1994). Computers are social actors. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 72-78. ACM.
  29. Pelachaud, C. (2009). Studies on gesture expressivity for a virtual agent. Speech Communication, 51(7):630- 639.
  30. Rickheit, G. and Wachsmuth, I. (2006). Situated Communication, volume 166. Walter de Gruyter.
  31. Sanghvi, J., Castellano, G., Leite, I., Pereira, A., McOwan, P. W., and Paiva, A. (2011). Automatic analysis of affective postures and body motion to detect engagement with a game companion. In 6th Intlernational Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pages 305- 311.
  32. Schroder, M., Bevacqua, E., Cowie, R., Eyben, F., Gunes, H., Heylen, D., Ter Maat, M., McKeown, G., Pammi, S., Pantic, M., et al. (2012). Building autonomous sensitive artificial listeners. Affective Computing, IEEE Transactions on, 3(2):165-183.
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Lala D., Nitschke C. and Nishida T. (2015). User Perceptions of Communicative and Task-competent Agents in a Virtual Basketball Game . In Proceedings of the International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1: ICAART, ISBN 978-989-758-073-4, pages 32-43. DOI: 10.5220/0005201200320043


in Bibtex Style

@conference{icaart15,
author={Divesh Lala and Christian Nitschke and Toyoaki Nishida},
title={User Perceptions of Communicative and Task-competent Agents in a Virtual Basketball Game},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1: ICAART,},
year={2015},
pages={32-43},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0005201200320043},
isbn={978-989-758-073-4},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence - Volume 1: ICAART,
TI - User Perceptions of Communicative and Task-competent Agents in a Virtual Basketball Game
SN - 978-989-758-073-4
AU - Lala D.
AU - Nitschke C.
AU - Nishida T.
PY - 2015
SP - 32
EP - 43
DO - 10.5220/0005201200320043