BRINGING SOCIAL CONSTRUCTS TO THE INFORMATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PROCESS: Contributions of Organisational Semiotics

Carlos Alberto Cocozza Simoni, M. Cecília C. Baranaukas, Rodrigo Bonacin

Abstract

Literature has shown the influence of the social, cultural and organisational aspects involved in the process of developing information systems. The Unified Process (UP) has been widely used in the software industry, but literature has shown its drawbacks when applied to the modelling of human actions in the social and organisational contexts. Our research investigates the use of Organisational Semiotics (OS) methods combined with the UP to compose a complete cycle of system development, aiming at bringing social constructs to the development process of information systems.

References

  1. Bonacin, R.(2004), “A Design Model to Support Cooperation Based on Participatory Design and Organisational Semiotics.” Ph.D. Thesis, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
  2. Bonacin, R., Baranauskas, M. C. C., and Liu, K. (2004) “From Ontology Charts to Class Diagrams: semantic analysis aiding systems design”, 6th ICEIS, Portugal.
  3. Dourish, P. (1995), Developing a Reflective Model of Collaborative Systems. ACM Transactions on HCI, Vol. 2, No. 1, March 1995.
  4. Ehn, P., Lowgren, J., 1997, “Design for Quality-in-use: Human-Computer Interaction Meets Information Systems Development”, in M. Helander, T.K. Landauer, P. Prabhu (eds.), Handbook of HumanComputer Interaction, 2nd ed., Elsevier Science.
  5. EUP, 2002, “Enterprise Unified Process” in the web http://www.enterpriseunifiedprocess.info/, accessed in 3/8/2004.
  6. Heusden, B. van e Jorna, R. J., 2000, “Reconsidering the Standard: A semiotic Model of Organization(s)”, Groningen University, Groningen, New Zealand.
  7. Jacobson, I. et al, 1996, Object-Oriented Software Engineering: A Use Case Driven Approach. ACM Press, Addison-Wesley Ed.
  8. Jacobson, I., Booch, G. B. e Rumbaugh, J., 1999, “The Unified Software Development Process”. AddisonWesley.
  9. Kruchten, P. (1999) The Rational Unified Process: an Introduction, Addison Wesley.
  10. Larman, C., 2002, “Applying UML and Patterns: An Introduction to Object-Oriented Analysis and Design and the Unified Process”. Prentice Hall, Inc.
  11. Leland, N. et al., 2002, “Rational Unified Process” in the http://www.cs.tufts.edu/g/180/fall02/public_html/team 1/index.html, accessed in 3/8/2004.
  12. Liu, K., Ades, Y e Stamper R. K., 1994, “Simplicity, Uniformity and Quality - the role of Semantic Analysis in system development”, Software Quality Management, volume 2, p. 219-235, Computational Mechanics Publications. ISBN: 1-85312-353-6.
  13. Liu, K., 2000, “Semiotics in Information Systems Engineering”, Cambridge University Press.
  14. OSW (1995), “The circulation document”. Organizational Semiotics Workshop, Enschede apud Liu, K. (2000), Semiotics in Information Systems Engineering, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  15. Pressman, R. S. (2001) Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach, McGraw-Hill, 5th Edition.
  16. Simoni, C. A. C. and Baranauskas, M. C. C. (2003) Launching Organizational Semiotics in the Real World: How to Prepare for it? The 6th International Workshop on Organizational Semiotics. Reading, UK.
  17. Simoni, C. A. C. and Baranauskas, M. C. C. (2004a) Organizational Semiotics Embedded in a System Development Cycle: A Case Study in a Business Organization. 6th ICEIS - International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems. Porto, Portugal.
  18. Simoni, C. A. C. and Baranauskas, M. C. C. (2004b) The Practice of Software Development and the Organizational Semiotics Approach: A Case Study in Business Organizations The 7th International Workshop on Organizational Semiotics. Portugal.
  19. Sommerville, I., 2001, “Software Engineering”, International computer science series, AddisonWesley Publishers Limited - USA, 6th Ed.
  20. Liu, K. (2000), Semiotics in Information Systems Engineering, Cambridge University Press.
  21. Stamper, R.K. (1993), Social Norms in requirements analysis - an outline of MEASUR, in Jirotka, M., Goguen, J. and Bickerton, M. (eds.), Requirements Engineering, Technical and Social Aspects. Academic Press, New York.
  22. Stamper, R., Liu K., Hafkamp M. and Ades Y., 2000, “Understanding the roles of signs and norms in organizations - a semiotic approach to information system design”, Behaviour & Information Technology, v.19/1, 15-27
Download


Paper Citation


in Harvard Style

Alberto Cocozza Simoni C., Cecília C. Baranaukas M. and Bonacin R. (2005). BRINGING SOCIAL CONSTRUCTS TO THE INFORMATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PROCESS: Contributions of Organisational Semiotics . In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS, ISBN 972-8865-19-8, pages 112-119. DOI: 10.5220/0002523201120119


in Bibtex Style

@conference{iceis05,
author={Carlos Alberto Cocozza Simoni and M. Cecília C. Baranaukas and Rodrigo Bonacin},
title={BRINGING SOCIAL CONSTRUCTS TO THE INFORMATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PROCESS: Contributions of Organisational Semiotics},
booktitle={Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,},
year={2005},
pages={112-119},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0002523201120119},
isbn={972-8865-19-8},
}


in EndNote Style

TY - CONF
JO - Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems - Volume 3: ICEIS,
TI - BRINGING SOCIAL CONSTRUCTS TO THE INFORMATION SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PROCESS: Contributions of Organisational Semiotics
SN - 972-8865-19-8
AU - Alberto Cocozza Simoni C.
AU - Cecília C. Baranaukas M.
AU - Bonacin R.
PY - 2005
SP - 112
EP - 119
DO - 10.5220/0002523201120119