loading
Documents

Research.Publish.Connect.

Paper

Paper Unlock

Authors: Jaimie Murdock ; Cameron Buckner and Colin Allen

Affiliation: Indiana University, United States

ISBN: 978-989-8425-29-4

Keyword(s): Ontology evaluation, Ontology evolution.

Related Ontology Subjects/Areas/Topics: Artificial Intelligence ; Data Engineering ; Domain Analysis and Modeling ; Enterprise Information Systems ; Information Systems Analysis and Specification ; Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development ; Knowledge Representation ; Knowledge-Based Systems ; Ontologies and the Semantic Web ; Ontology Engineering ; Ontology Matching and Alignment ; Symbolic Systems

Abstract: Ontology evaluation poses a number of difficult challenges requiring different evaluation methodologies, particularly for a “dynamic ontology” representing a complex set of concepts and generated by a combination of automatic and semi-automatic methods. We review evaluation methods that focus solely on syntactic (formal) correctness, on the preservation of semantic structure, or on pragmatic utility. We propose two novel methods for dynamic ontology evaluation and describe the use of these methods for evaluating the different taxonomic representations that are generated at different times or with different amounts of expert feedback. The proposed “volatility” and “violation” scores represent an attempt to merge syntactic and semantic considerations. Volatility calculates the stability of the methods for ontology generation and extension. Violation measures the degree of “ontological fit” to a text corpus representative of the domain. Combined, they support estimation of convergence to wards a stable representation of the domain. No method of evaluation can avoid making substantive normative assumptions about what constitutes “correct” representation, but rendering those assumptions explicit can help with the decision about which methods are appropriate for selecting amongst a set of available ontologies or for tuning the design of methods used to generate a hierarchically organized representation of a domain. (More)

PDF ImageFull Text

Download
Sign In Guest: Register as new SciTePress user now for free.

Sign In SciTePress user: please login.

PDF ImageMy Papers

You are not signed in, therefore limits apply to your IP address 3.80.85.76

In the current month:
Recent papers: 100 available of 100 total
2+ years older papers: 200 available of 200 total

Paper citation in several formats:
Murdock J., Buckner C. and Allen C. (2010). TWO METHODS FOR EVALUATING DYNAMIC ONTOLOGIES.In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development - Volume 1: KEOD, (IC3K 2010) ISBN 978-989-8425-29-4, pages 110-122. DOI: 10.5220/0003101601100122

@conference{keod10,
author={Jaimie Murdock and Cameron Buckner and Colin Allen},
title={TWO METHODS FOR EVALUATING DYNAMIC ONTOLOGIES},
booktitle={Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development - Volume 1: KEOD, (IC3K 2010)},
year={2010},
pages={110-122},
publisher={SciTePress},
organization={INSTICC},
doi={10.5220/0003101601100122},
isbn={978-989-8425-29-4},
}

TY - CONF

JO - Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Ontology Development - Volume 1: KEOD, (IC3K 2010)
TI - TWO METHODS FOR EVALUATING DYNAMIC ONTOLOGIES
SN - 978-989-8425-29-4
AU - Murdock J.
AU - Buckner C.
AU - Allen C.
PY - 2010
SP - 110
EP - 122
DO - 10.5220/0003101601100122

Login or register to post comments.

Comments on this Paper: Be the first to review this paper.